Comparing outcome criteria performance in adult strabismus surgery

Sarah R. Hatt, David A. Leske, Laura Liebermann, Jonathan M Holmes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the performance of motor, diplopia, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) criteria when analyzing outcomes of adult strabismus surgery. Design: Cohort study. Participants: We studied 159 adults undergoing 171 strabismus surgeries. Methods: All patients underwent clinical assessment preoperatively and 6 weeks postoperatively, including completion of Adult Strabismus-20 HRQOL questionnaires. Preoperatively, strabismus was classified as either diplopic (n = 117), nondiplopic (n = 38), or atypical diplopic (n = 16). To assess performance of motor, diplopia, and HRQOL criteria, success was defined a priori and applied separately and in combinations. For success: (1) motor criteria, <10 prism diopters by simultaneous prism cover test; (2) diplopia criteria, none or only rare in primary distance and for reading; (3) HRQOL criteria, exceeding previously reported 95% limits of agreement (LOA). Main Outcome Measures: Surgical success rate when applying motor, diplopia, and HRQOL criteria alone and in combinations. Results: Overall, success rates were 90% for motor criteria, 74% for diplopia criteria, and 60% for HRQOL criteria. Combining criteria, the highest success rate was for motor plus diplopia criteria (67%) and the lowest success rate was when combining motor, diplopia, and HRQOL criteria (50%). Conclusions: Applying motor criteria alone yields the highest success rates when evaluating outcomes in adult strabismus surgery, but motor criteria do not fully represent the patient's postoperative status. Combining diplopia criteria with motor criteria provides a more clinically relevant standard for judging the success of adult strabismus surgery. For HRQOL criteria, exceeding 95% LOA at 6 weeks postoperatively seems to be a difficult hurdle to clear for some individual patients, and evaluating change in HRQOL score may be more useful in cohort studies. Financial Disclosure(s): The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any of the materials discussed in this article.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1930-1936
Number of pages7
JournalOphthalmology
Volume119
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2012

Fingerprint

Strabismus
Diplopia
Quality of Life
Cohort Studies
Disclosure
Reading
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Comparing outcome criteria performance in adult strabismus surgery. / Hatt, Sarah R.; Leske, David A.; Liebermann, Laura; Holmes, Jonathan M.

In: Ophthalmology, Vol. 119, No. 9, 09.2012, p. 1930-1936.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hatt, Sarah R. ; Leske, David A. ; Liebermann, Laura ; Holmes, Jonathan M. / Comparing outcome criteria performance in adult strabismus surgery. In: Ophthalmology. 2012 ; Vol. 119, No. 9. pp. 1930-1936.
@article{a7d5a8ca9a4142a9aa60705a40e6d30a,
title = "Comparing outcome criteria performance in adult strabismus surgery",
abstract = "Purpose: To evaluate the performance of motor, diplopia, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) criteria when analyzing outcomes of adult strabismus surgery. Design: Cohort study. Participants: We studied 159 adults undergoing 171 strabismus surgeries. Methods: All patients underwent clinical assessment preoperatively and 6 weeks postoperatively, including completion of Adult Strabismus-20 HRQOL questionnaires. Preoperatively, strabismus was classified as either diplopic (n = 117), nondiplopic (n = 38), or atypical diplopic (n = 16). To assess performance of motor, diplopia, and HRQOL criteria, success was defined a priori and applied separately and in combinations. For success: (1) motor criteria, <10 prism diopters by simultaneous prism cover test; (2) diplopia criteria, none or only rare in primary distance and for reading; (3) HRQOL criteria, exceeding previously reported 95{\%} limits of agreement (LOA). Main Outcome Measures: Surgical success rate when applying motor, diplopia, and HRQOL criteria alone and in combinations. Results: Overall, success rates were 90{\%} for motor criteria, 74{\%} for diplopia criteria, and 60{\%} for HRQOL criteria. Combining criteria, the highest success rate was for motor plus diplopia criteria (67{\%}) and the lowest success rate was when combining motor, diplopia, and HRQOL criteria (50{\%}). Conclusions: Applying motor criteria alone yields the highest success rates when evaluating outcomes in adult strabismus surgery, but motor criteria do not fully represent the patient's postoperative status. Combining diplopia criteria with motor criteria provides a more clinically relevant standard for judging the success of adult strabismus surgery. For HRQOL criteria, exceeding 95{\%} LOA at 6 weeks postoperatively seems to be a difficult hurdle to clear for some individual patients, and evaluating change in HRQOL score may be more useful in cohort studies. Financial Disclosure(s): The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any of the materials discussed in this article.",
author = "Hatt, {Sarah R.} and Leske, {David A.} and Laura Liebermann and Holmes, {Jonathan M}",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.02.035",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "119",
pages = "1930--1936",
journal = "Ophthalmology",
issn = "0161-6420",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing outcome criteria performance in adult strabismus surgery

AU - Hatt, Sarah R.

AU - Leske, David A.

AU - Liebermann, Laura

AU - Holmes, Jonathan M

PY - 2012/9

Y1 - 2012/9

N2 - Purpose: To evaluate the performance of motor, diplopia, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) criteria when analyzing outcomes of adult strabismus surgery. Design: Cohort study. Participants: We studied 159 adults undergoing 171 strabismus surgeries. Methods: All patients underwent clinical assessment preoperatively and 6 weeks postoperatively, including completion of Adult Strabismus-20 HRQOL questionnaires. Preoperatively, strabismus was classified as either diplopic (n = 117), nondiplopic (n = 38), or atypical diplopic (n = 16). To assess performance of motor, diplopia, and HRQOL criteria, success was defined a priori and applied separately and in combinations. For success: (1) motor criteria, <10 prism diopters by simultaneous prism cover test; (2) diplopia criteria, none or only rare in primary distance and for reading; (3) HRQOL criteria, exceeding previously reported 95% limits of agreement (LOA). Main Outcome Measures: Surgical success rate when applying motor, diplopia, and HRQOL criteria alone and in combinations. Results: Overall, success rates were 90% for motor criteria, 74% for diplopia criteria, and 60% for HRQOL criteria. Combining criteria, the highest success rate was for motor plus diplopia criteria (67%) and the lowest success rate was when combining motor, diplopia, and HRQOL criteria (50%). Conclusions: Applying motor criteria alone yields the highest success rates when evaluating outcomes in adult strabismus surgery, but motor criteria do not fully represent the patient's postoperative status. Combining diplopia criteria with motor criteria provides a more clinically relevant standard for judging the success of adult strabismus surgery. For HRQOL criteria, exceeding 95% LOA at 6 weeks postoperatively seems to be a difficult hurdle to clear for some individual patients, and evaluating change in HRQOL score may be more useful in cohort studies. Financial Disclosure(s): The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any of the materials discussed in this article.

AB - Purpose: To evaluate the performance of motor, diplopia, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) criteria when analyzing outcomes of adult strabismus surgery. Design: Cohort study. Participants: We studied 159 adults undergoing 171 strabismus surgeries. Methods: All patients underwent clinical assessment preoperatively and 6 weeks postoperatively, including completion of Adult Strabismus-20 HRQOL questionnaires. Preoperatively, strabismus was classified as either diplopic (n = 117), nondiplopic (n = 38), or atypical diplopic (n = 16). To assess performance of motor, diplopia, and HRQOL criteria, success was defined a priori and applied separately and in combinations. For success: (1) motor criteria, <10 prism diopters by simultaneous prism cover test; (2) diplopia criteria, none or only rare in primary distance and for reading; (3) HRQOL criteria, exceeding previously reported 95% limits of agreement (LOA). Main Outcome Measures: Surgical success rate when applying motor, diplopia, and HRQOL criteria alone and in combinations. Results: Overall, success rates were 90% for motor criteria, 74% for diplopia criteria, and 60% for HRQOL criteria. Combining criteria, the highest success rate was for motor plus diplopia criteria (67%) and the lowest success rate was when combining motor, diplopia, and HRQOL criteria (50%). Conclusions: Applying motor criteria alone yields the highest success rates when evaluating outcomes in adult strabismus surgery, but motor criteria do not fully represent the patient's postoperative status. Combining diplopia criteria with motor criteria provides a more clinically relevant standard for judging the success of adult strabismus surgery. For HRQOL criteria, exceeding 95% LOA at 6 weeks postoperatively seems to be a difficult hurdle to clear for some individual patients, and evaluating change in HRQOL score may be more useful in cohort studies. Financial Disclosure(s): The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any of the materials discussed in this article.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84865674897&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84865674897&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.02.035

DO - 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.02.035

M3 - Article

C2 - 22541935

AN - SCOPUS:84865674897

VL - 119

SP - 1930

EP - 1936

JO - Ophthalmology

JF - Ophthalmology

SN - 0161-6420

IS - 9

ER -