TY - JOUR
T1 - Community paramedic hospital reduction and mitigation program
T2 - study protocol for a randomized pragmatic clinical trial
AU - Ridgeway, Jennifer L.
AU - Gerdes, Erin O.Wissler
AU - Dodge, Andrew
AU - Liedl, Chad P.
AU - Juntunen, Michael B.
AU - Sundt, Wendy J.S.
AU - Glasgow, Amy
AU - Lampman, Michelle A.
AU - Fink, Angela L.
AU - Severson, Sara B.
AU - Lin, Grace
AU - Sampson, Richard R.
AU - Peterson, Robert P.
AU - Murley, Brian M.
AU - Klassen, Aaron B.
AU - Luke, Anuradha
AU - Friedman, Paul A.
AU - Buechler, Tamara E.
AU - Newman, James S.
AU - McCoy, Rozalina G.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank Jessica McCoy, project manager at Mayo Clinic, for her support of this project, and Joseph G. Hentz, biostatistician at Mayo Clinic, for his expertise and guidance on the statistical analysis plan.
Funding Information:
This study was funded by Mayo Clinic Clinical Trials Award Funding and supported by Grant Number UL1 TR002377 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) and the Mayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Health. The sponsors do not have a role in the study design; in the data collection, analysis, and interpretation; or in the manuscript writing.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s).
PY - 2023/12
Y1 - 2023/12
N2 - Background: New patient-centered models of care are needed to individualize care and reduce high-cost care, including emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations for low- and intermediate-acuity conditions that could be managed outside the hospital setting. Community paramedics (CPs) have advanced training in low- and high-acuity care and are equipped to manage a wide range of health conditions, deliver patient education, and address social determinants of health in the home setting. The objective of this trial is to evaluate the effectiveness and implementation of the Care Anywhere with Community Paramedics (CACP) program with respect to shortening and preventing acute care utilization. Methods: This is a pragmatic, hybrid type 1, two-group, parallel-arm, 1:1 randomized clinical trial of CACP versus usual care that includes formative evaluation methods and assessment of implementation outcomes. It is being conducted in two sites in the US Midwest, which include small metropolitan areas and rural areas. Eligible patients are ≥ 18 years old; referred from an outpatient, ED, or hospital setting; clinically appropriate for ambulatory care with CP support; and residing within CP service areas of the referral sites. Aim 1 uses formative data collection with key clinical stakeholders and rapid qualitative analysis to identify potential facilitators/barriers to implementation and refine workflows in the 3-month period before trial enrollment commences (i.e., pre-implementation). Aim 2 uses mixed methods to evaluate CACP effectiveness, compared to usual care, by the number of days spent alive outside of the ED or hospital during the first 30 days following randomization (primary outcome), as well as self-reported quality of life and treatment burden, emergency medical services use, ED visits, hospitalizations, skilled nursing facility utilization, and adverse events (secondary outcomes). Implementation outcomes will be measured using the RE-AIM framework and include an assessment of perceived sustainability and metrics on equity in implementation. Aim 3 uses qualitative methods to understand patient, CP, and health care team perceptions of the intervention and recommendations for further refinement. In an effort to conduct a rigorous evaluation but also speed translation to practice, the planned duration of the trial is 15 months from the study launch to the end of enrollment. Discussion: This study will provide robust and timely evidence for the effectiveness of the CACP program, which may pave the way for large-scale implementation. Implementation outcomes will inform any needed refinements and best practices for scale-up and sustainability. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05232799. Registered on 10 February 2022.
AB - Background: New patient-centered models of care are needed to individualize care and reduce high-cost care, including emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations for low- and intermediate-acuity conditions that could be managed outside the hospital setting. Community paramedics (CPs) have advanced training in low- and high-acuity care and are equipped to manage a wide range of health conditions, deliver patient education, and address social determinants of health in the home setting. The objective of this trial is to evaluate the effectiveness and implementation of the Care Anywhere with Community Paramedics (CACP) program with respect to shortening and preventing acute care utilization. Methods: This is a pragmatic, hybrid type 1, two-group, parallel-arm, 1:1 randomized clinical trial of CACP versus usual care that includes formative evaluation methods and assessment of implementation outcomes. It is being conducted in two sites in the US Midwest, which include small metropolitan areas and rural areas. Eligible patients are ≥ 18 years old; referred from an outpatient, ED, or hospital setting; clinically appropriate for ambulatory care with CP support; and residing within CP service areas of the referral sites. Aim 1 uses formative data collection with key clinical stakeholders and rapid qualitative analysis to identify potential facilitators/barriers to implementation and refine workflows in the 3-month period before trial enrollment commences (i.e., pre-implementation). Aim 2 uses mixed methods to evaluate CACP effectiveness, compared to usual care, by the number of days spent alive outside of the ED or hospital during the first 30 days following randomization (primary outcome), as well as self-reported quality of life and treatment burden, emergency medical services use, ED visits, hospitalizations, skilled nursing facility utilization, and adverse events (secondary outcomes). Implementation outcomes will be measured using the RE-AIM framework and include an assessment of perceived sustainability and metrics on equity in implementation. Aim 3 uses qualitative methods to understand patient, CP, and health care team perceptions of the intervention and recommendations for further refinement. In an effort to conduct a rigorous evaluation but also speed translation to practice, the planned duration of the trial is 15 months from the study launch to the end of enrollment. Discussion: This study will provide robust and timely evidence for the effectiveness of the CACP program, which may pave the way for large-scale implementation. Implementation outcomes will inform any needed refinements and best practices for scale-up and sustainability. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05232799. Registered on 10 February 2022.
KW - Community health services
KW - Community paramedicine
KW - Emergency medical services
KW - Health care delivery
KW - Home health
KW - Implementation science
KW - Mobile integrated health
KW - Patient-centered care
KW - Pragmatic clinical trial
KW - Readmission
KW - Rural
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85148383455&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85148383455&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s13063-022-07034-w
DO - 10.1186/s13063-022-07034-w
M3 - Article
C2 - 36805692
AN - SCOPUS:85148383455
SN - 1745-6215
VL - 24
JO - Trials
JF - Trials
IS - 1
M1 - 122
ER -