Communication of genetic test results to family and health-care providers following disclosure of research results

Kristi D. Graves, Pamela S. Sinicrope, Mary Jane Esplen, Susan K. Peterson, Christi Ann Patten, Jan Lowery, Frank A Sinicrope, Sandra K. Nigon, Joyce Borgen, Sherri Sheinfeld Gorin, Louise A. Keogh, Noralane Morey Lindor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Few studies have examined methods to promote communication following the return of DNA mismatch repair genetic test results obtained during research. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate a telephone protocol for returning research results of DNA mismatch repair gene testing to identify Lynch syndrome. Methods: We invited individuals with known DNA mismatch repair mutations in their family, who were enrolled in the Colon Cancer Family Registry at the Mayo Clinic, to participate in this study. Participants completed surveys before and 6 months after DNA mismatch repair test result disclosure. Results: Among 107 participants, 79% opted to learn their DNA mismatch repair test results; of these, 44 (41%) carried DNA mismatch repair mutations. After disclosure, 54% reported screening for any type of cancer. Among carriers, >74% reported communicating results to family; communication was predicted by baseline confidence in coping with the genetic test result (Z = 1.97; P = 0.04). Result disclosure to a physician was predicted by greater perceived cancer risk (Z = 2.08; P = 0.03) and greater intention to share results with family (Z = 3.07; P = 0.002). Conclusion: Research versus clinically based gene disclosure presents challenges. A telephone disclosure process for the return of research-based results among Lynch syndrome families led to high rates of result uptake and participant communication of results to providers and family members.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)294-301
Number of pages8
JournalGenetics in Medicine
Volume16
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

DNA Mismatch Repair
Family Health
Disclosure
Health Personnel
Communication
Research
Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Neoplasms
Telephone
Mutation
Early Detection of Cancer
Colonic Neoplasms
Genes
Registries
Physicians
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • communication
  • gene test disclosure
  • Lynch syndrome
  • research
  • telephone genetic education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics(clinical)
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Communication of genetic test results to family and health-care providers following disclosure of research results. / Graves, Kristi D.; Sinicrope, Pamela S.; Esplen, Mary Jane; Peterson, Susan K.; Patten, Christi Ann; Lowery, Jan; Sinicrope, Frank A; Nigon, Sandra K.; Borgen, Joyce; Gorin, Sherri Sheinfeld; Keogh, Louise A.; Lindor, Noralane Morey.

In: Genetics in Medicine, Vol. 16, No. 4, 2014, p. 294-301.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Graves, KD, Sinicrope, PS, Esplen, MJ, Peterson, SK, Patten, CA, Lowery, J, Sinicrope, FA, Nigon, SK, Borgen, J, Gorin, SS, Keogh, LA & Lindor, NM 2014, 'Communication of genetic test results to family and health-care providers following disclosure of research results', Genetics in Medicine, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 294-301. https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2013.137
Graves, Kristi D. ; Sinicrope, Pamela S. ; Esplen, Mary Jane ; Peterson, Susan K. ; Patten, Christi Ann ; Lowery, Jan ; Sinicrope, Frank A ; Nigon, Sandra K. ; Borgen, Joyce ; Gorin, Sherri Sheinfeld ; Keogh, Louise A. ; Lindor, Noralane Morey. / Communication of genetic test results to family and health-care providers following disclosure of research results. In: Genetics in Medicine. 2014 ; Vol. 16, No. 4. pp. 294-301.
@article{c07994466a154782a2ee67c6cc2adf42,
title = "Communication of genetic test results to family and health-care providers following disclosure of research results",
abstract = "Purpose: Few studies have examined methods to promote communication following the return of DNA mismatch repair genetic test results obtained during research. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate a telephone protocol for returning research results of DNA mismatch repair gene testing to identify Lynch syndrome. Methods: We invited individuals with known DNA mismatch repair mutations in their family, who were enrolled in the Colon Cancer Family Registry at the Mayo Clinic, to participate in this study. Participants completed surveys before and 6 months after DNA mismatch repair test result disclosure. Results: Among 107 participants, 79{\%} opted to learn their DNA mismatch repair test results; of these, 44 (41{\%}) carried DNA mismatch repair mutations. After disclosure, 54{\%} reported screening for any type of cancer. Among carriers, >74{\%} reported communicating results to family; communication was predicted by baseline confidence in coping with the genetic test result (Z = 1.97; P = 0.04). Result disclosure to a physician was predicted by greater perceived cancer risk (Z = 2.08; P = 0.03) and greater intention to share results with family (Z = 3.07; P = 0.002). Conclusion: Research versus clinically based gene disclosure presents challenges. A telephone disclosure process for the return of research-based results among Lynch syndrome families led to high rates of result uptake and participant communication of results to providers and family members.",
keywords = "communication, gene test disclosure, Lynch syndrome, research, telephone genetic education",
author = "Graves, {Kristi D.} and Sinicrope, {Pamela S.} and Esplen, {Mary Jane} and Peterson, {Susan K.} and Patten, {Christi Ann} and Jan Lowery and Sinicrope, {Frank A} and Nigon, {Sandra K.} and Joyce Borgen and Gorin, {Sherri Sheinfeld} and Keogh, {Louise A.} and Lindor, {Noralane Morey}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1038/gim.2013.137",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "294--301",
journal = "Genetics in Medicine",
issn = "1098-3600",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Communication of genetic test results to family and health-care providers following disclosure of research results

AU - Graves, Kristi D.

AU - Sinicrope, Pamela S.

AU - Esplen, Mary Jane

AU - Peterson, Susan K.

AU - Patten, Christi Ann

AU - Lowery, Jan

AU - Sinicrope, Frank A

AU - Nigon, Sandra K.

AU - Borgen, Joyce

AU - Gorin, Sherri Sheinfeld

AU - Keogh, Louise A.

AU - Lindor, Noralane Morey

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Purpose: Few studies have examined methods to promote communication following the return of DNA mismatch repair genetic test results obtained during research. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate a telephone protocol for returning research results of DNA mismatch repair gene testing to identify Lynch syndrome. Methods: We invited individuals with known DNA mismatch repair mutations in their family, who were enrolled in the Colon Cancer Family Registry at the Mayo Clinic, to participate in this study. Participants completed surveys before and 6 months after DNA mismatch repair test result disclosure. Results: Among 107 participants, 79% opted to learn their DNA mismatch repair test results; of these, 44 (41%) carried DNA mismatch repair mutations. After disclosure, 54% reported screening for any type of cancer. Among carriers, >74% reported communicating results to family; communication was predicted by baseline confidence in coping with the genetic test result (Z = 1.97; P = 0.04). Result disclosure to a physician was predicted by greater perceived cancer risk (Z = 2.08; P = 0.03) and greater intention to share results with family (Z = 3.07; P = 0.002). Conclusion: Research versus clinically based gene disclosure presents challenges. A telephone disclosure process for the return of research-based results among Lynch syndrome families led to high rates of result uptake and participant communication of results to providers and family members.

AB - Purpose: Few studies have examined methods to promote communication following the return of DNA mismatch repair genetic test results obtained during research. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate a telephone protocol for returning research results of DNA mismatch repair gene testing to identify Lynch syndrome. Methods: We invited individuals with known DNA mismatch repair mutations in their family, who were enrolled in the Colon Cancer Family Registry at the Mayo Clinic, to participate in this study. Participants completed surveys before and 6 months after DNA mismatch repair test result disclosure. Results: Among 107 participants, 79% opted to learn their DNA mismatch repair test results; of these, 44 (41%) carried DNA mismatch repair mutations. After disclosure, 54% reported screening for any type of cancer. Among carriers, >74% reported communicating results to family; communication was predicted by baseline confidence in coping with the genetic test result (Z = 1.97; P = 0.04). Result disclosure to a physician was predicted by greater perceived cancer risk (Z = 2.08; P = 0.03) and greater intention to share results with family (Z = 3.07; P = 0.002). Conclusion: Research versus clinically based gene disclosure presents challenges. A telephone disclosure process for the return of research-based results among Lynch syndrome families led to high rates of result uptake and participant communication of results to providers and family members.

KW - communication

KW - gene test disclosure

KW - Lynch syndrome

KW - research

KW - telephone genetic education

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84898472379&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84898472379&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/gim.2013.137

DO - 10.1038/gim.2013.137

M3 - Article

C2 - 24091800

AN - SCOPUS:84898472379

VL - 16

SP - 294

EP - 301

JO - Genetics in Medicine

JF - Genetics in Medicine

SN - 1098-3600

IS - 4

ER -