Commentary

Race and ethnicity in biomedical research - Classifications, challenges, and future directions

Dame Idossa, Narjust Duma, Katerina Chekhovskiy, Ronald Go, Sikander Ailawadhi

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The use of race and ethnicity in biomedical research has been a subject of debate for the past three decades. Initially the two major race categories were: White and Black, leaving other minorities uncounted or inappropriately misclassified. As the science of health disparities evolves, more sophisticated and detailed information has been added to large databases. Despite the addition of new racial classifications, including multiracial denominations, the quality of the data is limited to the data collection process and other social misconceptions. Although race is viewed as an imposed or ascribed status, ethnicity is an achieved status, making it a more challenging variable to include in biomedical research. Ambiguity between race and ethnicity often exists, ultimately affecting the value of both variables. To better understand specific health outcomes or disparities of groups, it is necessary to collect subgroup-specific data. Cultural perceptions and practices, health experiences, and susceptibility to disease vary greatly among broad racial-ethnic groups and requires the collection of nuanced data to understand. Here, we provide an overview of the classification of race and ethnicity in the United States over time, the existing challenges in using race and ethnicity in biomedical research and future research directions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)561-564
Number of pages4
JournalEthnicity and Disease
Volume28
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2018

Fingerprint

Biomedical Research
Health
Disease Susceptibility
Ethnic Groups
Direction compound
Databases

Keywords

  • Biomedical Research
  • Ethnicity
  • Health Disparities
  • Race

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology

Cite this

Commentary : Race and ethnicity in biomedical research - Classifications, challenges, and future directions. / Idossa, Dame; Duma, Narjust; Chekhovskiy, Katerina; Go, Ronald; Ailawadhi, Sikander.

In: Ethnicity and Disease, Vol. 28, No. 4, 01.09.2018, p. 561-564.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Idossa, Dame ; Duma, Narjust ; Chekhovskiy, Katerina ; Go, Ronald ; Ailawadhi, Sikander. / Commentary : Race and ethnicity in biomedical research - Classifications, challenges, and future directions. In: Ethnicity and Disease. 2018 ; Vol. 28, No. 4. pp. 561-564.
@article{52f59a108b3045d8b56a681b12defa5b,
title = "Commentary: Race and ethnicity in biomedical research - Classifications, challenges, and future directions",
abstract = "The use of race and ethnicity in biomedical research has been a subject of debate for the past three decades. Initially the two major race categories were: White and Black, leaving other minorities uncounted or inappropriately misclassified. As the science of health disparities evolves, more sophisticated and detailed information has been added to large databases. Despite the addition of new racial classifications, including multiracial denominations, the quality of the data is limited to the data collection process and other social misconceptions. Although race is viewed as an imposed or ascribed status, ethnicity is an achieved status, making it a more challenging variable to include in biomedical research. Ambiguity between race and ethnicity often exists, ultimately affecting the value of both variables. To better understand specific health outcomes or disparities of groups, it is necessary to collect subgroup-specific data. Cultural perceptions and practices, health experiences, and susceptibility to disease vary greatly among broad racial-ethnic groups and requires the collection of nuanced data to understand. Here, we provide an overview of the classification of race and ethnicity in the United States over time, the existing challenges in using race and ethnicity in biomedical research and future research directions.",
keywords = "Biomedical Research, Ethnicity, Health Disparities, Race",
author = "Dame Idossa and Narjust Duma and Katerina Chekhovskiy and Ronald Go and Sikander Ailawadhi",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.18865/ed.28.4.561",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "561--564",
journal = "Ethnicity and Disease",
issn = "1049-510X",
publisher = "ISHIB",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Commentary

T2 - Race and ethnicity in biomedical research - Classifications, challenges, and future directions

AU - Idossa, Dame

AU - Duma, Narjust

AU - Chekhovskiy, Katerina

AU - Go, Ronald

AU - Ailawadhi, Sikander

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

N2 - The use of race and ethnicity in biomedical research has been a subject of debate for the past three decades. Initially the two major race categories were: White and Black, leaving other minorities uncounted or inappropriately misclassified. As the science of health disparities evolves, more sophisticated and detailed information has been added to large databases. Despite the addition of new racial classifications, including multiracial denominations, the quality of the data is limited to the data collection process and other social misconceptions. Although race is viewed as an imposed or ascribed status, ethnicity is an achieved status, making it a more challenging variable to include in biomedical research. Ambiguity between race and ethnicity often exists, ultimately affecting the value of both variables. To better understand specific health outcomes or disparities of groups, it is necessary to collect subgroup-specific data. Cultural perceptions and practices, health experiences, and susceptibility to disease vary greatly among broad racial-ethnic groups and requires the collection of nuanced data to understand. Here, we provide an overview of the classification of race and ethnicity in the United States over time, the existing challenges in using race and ethnicity in biomedical research and future research directions.

AB - The use of race and ethnicity in biomedical research has been a subject of debate for the past three decades. Initially the two major race categories were: White and Black, leaving other minorities uncounted or inappropriately misclassified. As the science of health disparities evolves, more sophisticated and detailed information has been added to large databases. Despite the addition of new racial classifications, including multiracial denominations, the quality of the data is limited to the data collection process and other social misconceptions. Although race is viewed as an imposed or ascribed status, ethnicity is an achieved status, making it a more challenging variable to include in biomedical research. Ambiguity between race and ethnicity often exists, ultimately affecting the value of both variables. To better understand specific health outcomes or disparities of groups, it is necessary to collect subgroup-specific data. Cultural perceptions and practices, health experiences, and susceptibility to disease vary greatly among broad racial-ethnic groups and requires the collection of nuanced data to understand. Here, we provide an overview of the classification of race and ethnicity in the United States over time, the existing challenges in using race and ethnicity in biomedical research and future research directions.

KW - Biomedical Research

KW - Ethnicity

KW - Health Disparities

KW - Race

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055471135&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055471135&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.18865/ed.28.4.561

DO - 10.18865/ed.28.4.561

M3 - Review article

VL - 28

SP - 561

EP - 564

JO - Ethnicity and Disease

JF - Ethnicity and Disease

SN - 1049-510X

IS - 4

ER -