TY - JOUR
T1 - Commentary
T2 - Race and ethnicity in biomedical research - Classifications, challenges, and future directions
AU - Idossa, Dame
AU - Duma, Narjust
AU - Chekhovskiy, Katerina
AU - Go, Ronald
AU - Ailawadhi, Sikander
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 ISHIB. All rights reserved.
PY - 2018/9/1
Y1 - 2018/9/1
N2 - The use of race and ethnicity in biomedical research has been a subject of debate for the past three decades. Initially the two major race categories were: White and Black, leaving other minorities uncounted or inappropriately misclassified. As the science of health disparities evolves, more sophisticated and detailed information has been added to large databases. Despite the addition of new racial classifications, including multiracial denominations, the quality of the data is limited to the data collection process and other social misconceptions. Although race is viewed as an imposed or ascribed status, ethnicity is an achieved status, making it a more challenging variable to include in biomedical research. Ambiguity between race and ethnicity often exists, ultimately affecting the value of both variables. To better understand specific health outcomes or disparities of groups, it is necessary to collect subgroup-specific data. Cultural perceptions and practices, health experiences, and susceptibility to disease vary greatly among broad racial-ethnic groups and requires the collection of nuanced data to understand. Here, we provide an overview of the classification of race and ethnicity in the United States over time, the existing challenges in using race and ethnicity in biomedical research and future research directions.
AB - The use of race and ethnicity in biomedical research has been a subject of debate for the past three decades. Initially the two major race categories were: White and Black, leaving other minorities uncounted or inappropriately misclassified. As the science of health disparities evolves, more sophisticated and detailed information has been added to large databases. Despite the addition of new racial classifications, including multiracial denominations, the quality of the data is limited to the data collection process and other social misconceptions. Although race is viewed as an imposed or ascribed status, ethnicity is an achieved status, making it a more challenging variable to include in biomedical research. Ambiguity between race and ethnicity often exists, ultimately affecting the value of both variables. To better understand specific health outcomes or disparities of groups, it is necessary to collect subgroup-specific data. Cultural perceptions and practices, health experiences, and susceptibility to disease vary greatly among broad racial-ethnic groups and requires the collection of nuanced data to understand. Here, we provide an overview of the classification of race and ethnicity in the United States over time, the existing challenges in using race and ethnicity in biomedical research and future research directions.
KW - Biomedical Research
KW - Ethnicity
KW - Health Disparities
KW - Race
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055471135&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055471135&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.18865/ed.28.4.561
DO - 10.18865/ed.28.4.561
M3 - Review article
C2 - 30405301
AN - SCOPUS:85055471135
SN - 1049-510X
VL - 28
SP - 561
EP - 564
JO - Ethnicity and Disease
JF - Ethnicity and Disease
IS - 4
ER -