Clinician usage patterns of a desktop radiology information display application

Bradley J. Erickson; William J. Ryan; Dale G. Gehring; Calvin Beebe

doi:10.1007/bf03168285

Clinician usage patterns of a desktop radiology information display application

Bradley J. Erickson, William J. Ryan, Dale G. Gehring, Calvin Beebe

Radiology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

We developed a system for delivering radiologic images and reports to desktop computers used for the electronic medical record (EMR). This system was used by both primary care physicians and specialists primarily in the out-patient setting. The system records all physician interactions with the application to a database. This usage information was then studied in order to understand the value and requirements of an application that could display radiology information (reports and images) on EMR workstations. In this report we describe some of the differences and similarities in usage patterns for the two physician groups. A very high percentage of physicians indicated that having image display capabilities on the workstations was very valuable.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	[d]137-141
Journal	Journal of Digital Imaging
Volume	11
Issue number	3 Suppl 1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03168285
State	Published - 1998

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Computer Science Applications

Access to Document

10.1007/bf03168285

Cite this

@article{283df2a80b8c4aeebb7ca7300ad4d702,

title = "Clinician usage patterns of a desktop radiology information display application",

abstract = "We developed a system for delivering radiologic images and reports to desktop computers used for the electronic medical record (EMR). This system was used by both primary care physicians and specialists primarily in the out-patient setting. The system records all physician interactions with the application to a database. This usage information was then studied in order to understand the value and requirements of an application that could display radiology information (reports and images) on EMR workstations. In this report we describe some of the differences and similarities in usage patterns for the two physician groups. A very high percentage of physicians indicated that having image display capabilities on the workstations was very valuable.",

author = "Erickson, {Bradley J.} and Ryan, {William J.} and Gehring, {Dale G.} and Calvin Beebe",

year = "1998",

doi = "10.1007/bf03168285",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "11",

pages = "[d]137--141",

journal = "Journal of Digital Imaging",

issn = "0897-1889",

publisher = "Springer New York",

number = "3 Suppl 1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinician usage patterns of a desktop radiology information display application

AU - Erickson, Bradley J.

AU - Ryan, William J.

AU - Gehring, Dale G.

AU - Beebe, Calvin

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - We developed a system for delivering radiologic images and reports to desktop computers used for the electronic medical record (EMR). This system was used by both primary care physicians and specialists primarily in the out-patient setting. The system records all physician interactions with the application to a database. This usage information was then studied in order to understand the value and requirements of an application that could display radiology information (reports and images) on EMR workstations. In this report we describe some of the differences and similarities in usage patterns for the two physician groups. A very high percentage of physicians indicated that having image display capabilities on the workstations was very valuable.

AB - We developed a system for delivering radiologic images and reports to desktop computers used for the electronic medical record (EMR). This system was used by both primary care physicians and specialists primarily in the out-patient setting. The system records all physician interactions with the application to a database. This usage information was then studied in order to understand the value and requirements of an application that could display radiology information (reports and images) on EMR workstations. In this report we describe some of the differences and similarities in usage patterns for the two physician groups. A very high percentage of physicians indicated that having image display capabilities on the workstations was very valuable.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032129248&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032129248&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/bf03168285

DO - 10.1007/bf03168285

M3 - Article

C2 - 9735452

AN - SCOPUS:0032129248

SN - 0897-1889

VL - 11

SP - [d]137-141

JO - Journal of Digital Imaging

JF - Journal of Digital Imaging

IS - 3 Suppl 1

ER -

Clinician usage patterns of a desktop radiology information display application

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this