Clinical utility and interobserver agreement of autofluorescence imaging and magnification narrow-band imaging for the evaluation of Barrett's esophagus: A prospective tandem study

Maria Giacchino, Ajay Bansal, Raymond E. Kim, Vikas Singh, Sandy B. Hall, Mandeep Singh, Amit Rastogi, Brian Moloney, Sachin B. Wani, Srinivas Gaddam, Sharad C. Mathur, Michael B. Wallace, Vijay Kanakadandi, Gokulakrishnan Balasubramanian, Neil Gupta, Prateek Sharma

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: New endoscopic imaging techniques, such as autofluorescence imaging (AFI) and narrow-band imaging (NBI), have been developed to improve the detection of neoplastic lesions in Barrett's esophagus (BE). Objective: To evaluate the clinical utility of AFI and magnification NBI to detect high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and early esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and the interobserver agreement. Design: Prospective tandem study of eligible patients. Setting: Single, academic tertiary care center. Patients: Forty-two patients with a history of confirmed BE were prospectively enrolled. Interventions: The BE segment was examined under high-definition white-light endoscopy, and the presence of visible lesions was recorded. Subsequently, AFI and magnification NBI were performed in tandem on areas of the BE segment away from visible lesions; images obtained by these 2 systems were graded according to the color of reflected light and surface patterns, respectively. Biopsy specimens were obtained at the end of the procedure. Main Outcome Measurements: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value (NPV) of the AFI and NBI patterns for the detection of HGD/EAC and interobserver agreement. Results: Of the 42 patients enrolled, 14 (33%) had HGD/EAC. On patient-based analysis, AFI alone had a sensitivity, specificity, and NPV of 50%, 61%, and 71%, respectively, and the overall accuracy for the detection of HGD/EAC patients was 57%. By using magnification NBI in tandem fashion, the sensitivity and NPV improved to 71% and 76%, respectively, with a decrease in specificity to 46% and in overall accuracy to 55%. The 2 techniques had moderate interobserver agreement for both the patterns and prediction of histology. Limitations: Uncontrolled study performed at an academic center by expert endoscopists in a high-risk population. Conclusions: By using a multimodality endoscope, both AFI and magnification NBI had limited clinical accuracy and moderate overall interobserver agreement. AFI does not appear to be useful as a broad-based technique for the detection of neoplasia in patients with BE.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)711-718
Number of pages8
JournalGastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume77
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2013

Fingerprint

Narrow Band Imaging
Barrett Esophagus
Optical Imaging
Prospective Studies
Adenocarcinoma
Light
Sensitivity and Specificity
Endoscopes
Tertiary Care Centers
Endoscopy
Histology
Color
Biopsy

Keywords

  • AFI
  • autofluorescence imaging
  • Barrett's esophagus
  • BE
  • CI
  • confidence interval
  • EAC
  • esophageal adenocarcinoma
  • HD-WLE
  • HGD
  • high-definition white-light endoscopy
  • high-grade dysplasia
  • IM
  • IND
  • indefinite for dysplasia
  • intestinal metaplasia
  • LGD
  • low-grade dysplasia
  • narrow-band imaging
  • NBI
  • negative predictive value
  • NPV
  • SD
  • SD-WLE
  • standard deviation
  • standard-definition white-light endoscopy
  • white-light endoscopy
  • WLE

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Clinical utility and interobserver agreement of autofluorescence imaging and magnification narrow-band imaging for the evaluation of Barrett's esophagus : A prospective tandem study. / Giacchino, Maria; Bansal, Ajay; Kim, Raymond E.; Singh, Vikas; Hall, Sandy B.; Singh, Mandeep; Rastogi, Amit; Moloney, Brian; Wani, Sachin B.; Gaddam, Srinivas; Mathur, Sharad C.; Wallace, Michael B.; Kanakadandi, Vijay; Balasubramanian, Gokulakrishnan; Gupta, Neil; Sharma, Prateek.

In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Vol. 77, No. 5, 05.2013, p. 711-718.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Giacchino, M, Bansal, A, Kim, RE, Singh, V, Hall, SB, Singh, M, Rastogi, A, Moloney, B, Wani, SB, Gaddam, S, Mathur, SC, Wallace, MB, Kanakadandi, V, Balasubramanian, G, Gupta, N & Sharma, P 2013, 'Clinical utility and interobserver agreement of autofluorescence imaging and magnification narrow-band imaging for the evaluation of Barrett's esophagus: A prospective tandem study', Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 77, no. 5, pp. 711-718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2013.01.029
Giacchino, Maria ; Bansal, Ajay ; Kim, Raymond E. ; Singh, Vikas ; Hall, Sandy B. ; Singh, Mandeep ; Rastogi, Amit ; Moloney, Brian ; Wani, Sachin B. ; Gaddam, Srinivas ; Mathur, Sharad C. ; Wallace, Michael B. ; Kanakadandi, Vijay ; Balasubramanian, Gokulakrishnan ; Gupta, Neil ; Sharma, Prateek. / Clinical utility and interobserver agreement of autofluorescence imaging and magnification narrow-band imaging for the evaluation of Barrett's esophagus : A prospective tandem study. In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2013 ; Vol. 77, No. 5. pp. 711-718.
@article{cbdf4e5947a641db8f2a67843c635d72,
title = "Clinical utility and interobserver agreement of autofluorescence imaging and magnification narrow-band imaging for the evaluation of Barrett's esophagus: A prospective tandem study",
abstract = "Background: New endoscopic imaging techniques, such as autofluorescence imaging (AFI) and narrow-band imaging (NBI), have been developed to improve the detection of neoplastic lesions in Barrett's esophagus (BE). Objective: To evaluate the clinical utility of AFI and magnification NBI to detect high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and early esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and the interobserver agreement. Design: Prospective tandem study of eligible patients. Setting: Single, academic tertiary care center. Patients: Forty-two patients with a history of confirmed BE were prospectively enrolled. Interventions: The BE segment was examined under high-definition white-light endoscopy, and the presence of visible lesions was recorded. Subsequently, AFI and magnification NBI were performed in tandem on areas of the BE segment away from visible lesions; images obtained by these 2 systems were graded according to the color of reflected light and surface patterns, respectively. Biopsy specimens were obtained at the end of the procedure. Main Outcome Measurements: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value (NPV) of the AFI and NBI patterns for the detection of HGD/EAC and interobserver agreement. Results: Of the 42 patients enrolled, 14 (33{\%}) had HGD/EAC. On patient-based analysis, AFI alone had a sensitivity, specificity, and NPV of 50{\%}, 61{\%}, and 71{\%}, respectively, and the overall accuracy for the detection of HGD/EAC patients was 57{\%}. By using magnification NBI in tandem fashion, the sensitivity and NPV improved to 71{\%} and 76{\%}, respectively, with a decrease in specificity to 46{\%} and in overall accuracy to 55{\%}. The 2 techniques had moderate interobserver agreement for both the patterns and prediction of histology. Limitations: Uncontrolled study performed at an academic center by expert endoscopists in a high-risk population. Conclusions: By using a multimodality endoscope, both AFI and magnification NBI had limited clinical accuracy and moderate overall interobserver agreement. AFI does not appear to be useful as a broad-based technique for the detection of neoplasia in patients with BE.",
keywords = "AFI, autofluorescence imaging, Barrett's esophagus, BE, CI, confidence interval, EAC, esophageal adenocarcinoma, HD-WLE, HGD, high-definition white-light endoscopy, high-grade dysplasia, IM, IND, indefinite for dysplasia, intestinal metaplasia, LGD, low-grade dysplasia, narrow-band imaging, NBI, negative predictive value, NPV, SD, SD-WLE, standard deviation, standard-definition white-light endoscopy, white-light endoscopy, WLE",
author = "Maria Giacchino and Ajay Bansal and Kim, {Raymond E.} and Vikas Singh and Hall, {Sandy B.} and Mandeep Singh and Amit Rastogi and Brian Moloney and Wani, {Sachin B.} and Srinivas Gaddam and Mathur, {Sharad C.} and Wallace, {Michael B.} and Vijay Kanakadandi and Gokulakrishnan Balasubramanian and Neil Gupta and Prateek Sharma",
year = "2013",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.gie.2013.01.029",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "77",
pages = "711--718",
journal = "Gastrointestinal Endoscopy",
issn = "0016-5107",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical utility and interobserver agreement of autofluorescence imaging and magnification narrow-band imaging for the evaluation of Barrett's esophagus

T2 - A prospective tandem study

AU - Giacchino, Maria

AU - Bansal, Ajay

AU - Kim, Raymond E.

AU - Singh, Vikas

AU - Hall, Sandy B.

AU - Singh, Mandeep

AU - Rastogi, Amit

AU - Moloney, Brian

AU - Wani, Sachin B.

AU - Gaddam, Srinivas

AU - Mathur, Sharad C.

AU - Wallace, Michael B.

AU - Kanakadandi, Vijay

AU - Balasubramanian, Gokulakrishnan

AU - Gupta, Neil

AU - Sharma, Prateek

PY - 2013/5

Y1 - 2013/5

N2 - Background: New endoscopic imaging techniques, such as autofluorescence imaging (AFI) and narrow-band imaging (NBI), have been developed to improve the detection of neoplastic lesions in Barrett's esophagus (BE). Objective: To evaluate the clinical utility of AFI and magnification NBI to detect high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and early esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and the interobserver agreement. Design: Prospective tandem study of eligible patients. Setting: Single, academic tertiary care center. Patients: Forty-two patients with a history of confirmed BE were prospectively enrolled. Interventions: The BE segment was examined under high-definition white-light endoscopy, and the presence of visible lesions was recorded. Subsequently, AFI and magnification NBI were performed in tandem on areas of the BE segment away from visible lesions; images obtained by these 2 systems were graded according to the color of reflected light and surface patterns, respectively. Biopsy specimens were obtained at the end of the procedure. Main Outcome Measurements: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value (NPV) of the AFI and NBI patterns for the detection of HGD/EAC and interobserver agreement. Results: Of the 42 patients enrolled, 14 (33%) had HGD/EAC. On patient-based analysis, AFI alone had a sensitivity, specificity, and NPV of 50%, 61%, and 71%, respectively, and the overall accuracy for the detection of HGD/EAC patients was 57%. By using magnification NBI in tandem fashion, the sensitivity and NPV improved to 71% and 76%, respectively, with a decrease in specificity to 46% and in overall accuracy to 55%. The 2 techniques had moderate interobserver agreement for both the patterns and prediction of histology. Limitations: Uncontrolled study performed at an academic center by expert endoscopists in a high-risk population. Conclusions: By using a multimodality endoscope, both AFI and magnification NBI had limited clinical accuracy and moderate overall interobserver agreement. AFI does not appear to be useful as a broad-based technique for the detection of neoplasia in patients with BE.

AB - Background: New endoscopic imaging techniques, such as autofluorescence imaging (AFI) and narrow-band imaging (NBI), have been developed to improve the detection of neoplastic lesions in Barrett's esophagus (BE). Objective: To evaluate the clinical utility of AFI and magnification NBI to detect high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and early esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and the interobserver agreement. Design: Prospective tandem study of eligible patients. Setting: Single, academic tertiary care center. Patients: Forty-two patients with a history of confirmed BE were prospectively enrolled. Interventions: The BE segment was examined under high-definition white-light endoscopy, and the presence of visible lesions was recorded. Subsequently, AFI and magnification NBI were performed in tandem on areas of the BE segment away from visible lesions; images obtained by these 2 systems were graded according to the color of reflected light and surface patterns, respectively. Biopsy specimens were obtained at the end of the procedure. Main Outcome Measurements: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value (NPV) of the AFI and NBI patterns for the detection of HGD/EAC and interobserver agreement. Results: Of the 42 patients enrolled, 14 (33%) had HGD/EAC. On patient-based analysis, AFI alone had a sensitivity, specificity, and NPV of 50%, 61%, and 71%, respectively, and the overall accuracy for the detection of HGD/EAC patients was 57%. By using magnification NBI in tandem fashion, the sensitivity and NPV improved to 71% and 76%, respectively, with a decrease in specificity to 46% and in overall accuracy to 55%. The 2 techniques had moderate interobserver agreement for both the patterns and prediction of histology. Limitations: Uncontrolled study performed at an academic center by expert endoscopists in a high-risk population. Conclusions: By using a multimodality endoscope, both AFI and magnification NBI had limited clinical accuracy and moderate overall interobserver agreement. AFI does not appear to be useful as a broad-based technique for the detection of neoplasia in patients with BE.

KW - AFI

KW - autofluorescence imaging

KW - Barrett's esophagus

KW - BE

KW - CI

KW - confidence interval

KW - EAC

KW - esophageal adenocarcinoma

KW - HD-WLE

KW - HGD

KW - high-definition white-light endoscopy

KW - high-grade dysplasia

KW - IM

KW - IND

KW - indefinite for dysplasia

KW - intestinal metaplasia

KW - LGD

KW - low-grade dysplasia

KW - narrow-band imaging

KW - NBI

KW - negative predictive value

KW - NPV

KW - SD

KW - SD-WLE

KW - standard deviation

KW - standard-definition white-light endoscopy

KW - white-light endoscopy

KW - WLE

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876153384&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84876153384&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.gie.2013.01.029

DO - 10.1016/j.gie.2013.01.029

M3 - Article

C2 - 23433595

AN - SCOPUS:84876153384

VL - 77

SP - 711

EP - 718

JO - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

JF - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

SN - 0016-5107

IS - 5

ER -