TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinical Trial Endpoints in Metastatic Cancer
T2 - Using Individual Participant Data to Inform Future Trials Methodology
AU - Goldberg, Richard M.
AU - Adams, Richard
AU - Buyse, Marc
AU - Eng, Cathy
AU - Grothey, Axel
AU - Andre, Thierry
AU - Sobrero, Alberto F.
AU - Lichtman, Stuart M.
AU - Benson, Al B.
AU - Punt, Cornelis J.A.
AU - Maughan, Tim
AU - Burzykowski, Tomasz
AU - Sommeijer, Dirkje
AU - Saad, Everardo D.
AU - Shi, Qian
AU - Coart, Elisabeth
AU - Chibaudel, Benoist
AU - Koopman, Miriam
AU - Schmoll, Hans Joachim
AU - Yoshino, Takayuki
AU - Taieb, Julien
AU - Tebbutt, Niall C.
AU - Zalcberg, John
AU - Tabernero, Josep
AU - Van Cutsem, Eric
AU - Matheson, Alastair
AU - De Gramont, Aimery
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/6/1
Y1 - 2022/6/1
N2 - Meta-Analysis based on individual participant data (IPD) is a powerful methodology for synthesizing evidence by combining information drawn from multiple trials. Hitherto, its principal application has been in questions of clinical management, but an increasingly important use is in clarifying trials methodology, for instance in the selection of endpoints, as discussed in this review. In oncology, the Aide et Recherche en Cancerologie Digestive (ARCAD) Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Database is a leader in the use of IPD-based meta-Analysis in methodological research. The ARCAD database contains IPD from more than 38 000 patients enrolled in 46 studies and continues to collect phase III trial data. Here, we review the principal findings of the ARCAD project in respect of endpoint selection and examine their implications for cancer trials. Analysis of the database has confirmed that progression-free survival (PFS) is no longer a valid surrogate endpoint predictive of overall survival in the first-line treatment of colorectal cancer. Nonetheless, PFS remains an endpoint of choice for most first-line trials in metastatic colorectal cancer and other solid tumors. Only substantial PFS effects are likely to translate into clinically meaningful benefits, and accordingly, we advocate an oncology research model designed to identify highly effective treatments in carefully defined patient groups. We also review the use of the ARCAD database in assessing clinical response including novel response metrics and prognostic markers. These studies demonstrate the value of IPD as a tool for methodological studies and provide a reference point for the expansion of this approach within clinical cancer research.
AB - Meta-Analysis based on individual participant data (IPD) is a powerful methodology for synthesizing evidence by combining information drawn from multiple trials. Hitherto, its principal application has been in questions of clinical management, but an increasingly important use is in clarifying trials methodology, for instance in the selection of endpoints, as discussed in this review. In oncology, the Aide et Recherche en Cancerologie Digestive (ARCAD) Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Database is a leader in the use of IPD-based meta-Analysis in methodological research. The ARCAD database contains IPD from more than 38 000 patients enrolled in 46 studies and continues to collect phase III trial data. Here, we review the principal findings of the ARCAD project in respect of endpoint selection and examine their implications for cancer trials. Analysis of the database has confirmed that progression-free survival (PFS) is no longer a valid surrogate endpoint predictive of overall survival in the first-line treatment of colorectal cancer. Nonetheless, PFS remains an endpoint of choice for most first-line trials in metastatic colorectal cancer and other solid tumors. Only substantial PFS effects are likely to translate into clinically meaningful benefits, and accordingly, we advocate an oncology research model designed to identify highly effective treatments in carefully defined patient groups. We also review the use of the ARCAD database in assessing clinical response including novel response metrics and prognostic markers. These studies demonstrate the value of IPD as a tool for methodological studies and provide a reference point for the expansion of this approach within clinical cancer research.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85131903163&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85131903163&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/jnci/djab218
DO - 10.1093/jnci/djab218
M3 - Review article
C2 - 34865086
AN - SCOPUS:85131903163
SN - 0027-8874
VL - 114
SP - 819
EP - 828
JO - Journal of the National Cancer Institute
JF - Journal of the National Cancer Institute
IS - 6
ER -