TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinical significance of recurrent gastroesophageal junction intestinal metaplasia after endoscopic eradication of Barrett's esophagus
AU - Solfisburg, Quinn S.
AU - Sami, Sarmed S.
AU - Gabre, Joel
AU - Soroush, Ali
AU - Dhaliwal, Lovekirat
AU - Beveridge, Claire
AU - Jin, Zhezhen
AU - Poneros, John M.
AU - Falk, Gary W.
AU - Ginsberg, Gregory G.
AU - Wang, Kenneth K.
AU - Lightdale, Charles J.
AU - Iyer, Prasad G.
AU - Abrams, Julian A.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding: JG, ZJ, GWF, KKW, PGI, and JAA were supported in part by a U54 award from the National Cancer Institute (U54 CA163004, PI Timothy Wang).
Funding Information:
Funding: JG, ZJ, GWF, KKW, PGI, and JAA were supported in part by a U54 award from the National Cancer Institute (U54 CA163004, PI Timothy Wang). DISCLOSURE: The following authors disclosed financial relationships: J. Gabre: Investment shares in Inovio Inc. G.W. Falk: Research support from and consultant for Lucid and Interpace; consultant for CDX and Cernostics. G.G. Ginsberg: Consultant for Olympus Inc and Boston Scientific Corp. K. K. Wang: Research support from Endorotor and Erbe. P. G. Iyer: Consultant for Pentax Medical, Medtronic, Symple Surgical, and CSA Medical; research support from Exact Sciences, Pentax Medical, and Medtronic. J. A. Abrams: Research support from Pentax Medical; consultant for Exact Sciences. All other authors disclosed no financial relationships.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Background and Aims: After endoscopic eradication of Barrett's esophagus (BE), recurrence of intestinal metaplasia at the gastroesophageal junction (GEJIM) is common. The clinical significance of this finding is unclear. We assessed whether recurrent GEJIM is associated with increased risk of subsequent dysplasia and whether endoscopic treatment lowers this risk. Methods: A retrospective, multicenter, cohort study was performed of treated BE patients who achieved complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia (IM). Postablation follow-up was performed at standard intervals. Recurrent GEJIM was defined as nondysplastic IM on gastroesophageal junction biopsy specimens without endoscopic evidence of BE. Patients were categorized as “never-GEJIM,” “GEJIM-observed,” or “GEJIM-treated.” Endoscopic treatment for recurrent GEJIM was at the endoscopists’ discretion. The primary outcome was dysplasia recurrence. Analyses were performed using log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards modeling. Results: Six hundred thirty-three patients were analyzed; median follow-up was 47 months (interquartile range, 24-69). Most patients (81%) had high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal adenocarcinoma before treatment. Dysplasia recurrence was 2.2% per year. GEJIM-observed patients had the lowest rate of recurrence ( .6%/y) followed by GEJIM-treated (2.2%/y) and never-GEJIM (2.6%/y) (log-rank P = .07). In multivariate analyses, compared with never-GEJIM, the risk of dysplasia recurrence was significantly lower in GEJIM-observed patients (adjusted hazard ratio, .19; 95% confidence interval, .05- .81) and not different in GEJIM-treated patients (adjusted hazard ratio, .81; 95% confidence interval, .39-1.67). Older age and longer initial BE length were independently associated with recurrence. Conclusions: Recurrent GEJIM after endoscopic eradication of BE was not associated with an increased risk of subsequent dysplasia. Future studies are warranted to determine if observation is appropriate for this finding.
AB - Background and Aims: After endoscopic eradication of Barrett's esophagus (BE), recurrence of intestinal metaplasia at the gastroesophageal junction (GEJIM) is common. The clinical significance of this finding is unclear. We assessed whether recurrent GEJIM is associated with increased risk of subsequent dysplasia and whether endoscopic treatment lowers this risk. Methods: A retrospective, multicenter, cohort study was performed of treated BE patients who achieved complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia (IM). Postablation follow-up was performed at standard intervals. Recurrent GEJIM was defined as nondysplastic IM on gastroesophageal junction biopsy specimens without endoscopic evidence of BE. Patients were categorized as “never-GEJIM,” “GEJIM-observed,” or “GEJIM-treated.” Endoscopic treatment for recurrent GEJIM was at the endoscopists’ discretion. The primary outcome was dysplasia recurrence. Analyses were performed using log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards modeling. Results: Six hundred thirty-three patients were analyzed; median follow-up was 47 months (interquartile range, 24-69). Most patients (81%) had high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal adenocarcinoma before treatment. Dysplasia recurrence was 2.2% per year. GEJIM-observed patients had the lowest rate of recurrence ( .6%/y) followed by GEJIM-treated (2.2%/y) and never-GEJIM (2.6%/y) (log-rank P = .07). In multivariate analyses, compared with never-GEJIM, the risk of dysplasia recurrence was significantly lower in GEJIM-observed patients (adjusted hazard ratio, .19; 95% confidence interval, .05- .81) and not different in GEJIM-treated patients (adjusted hazard ratio, .81; 95% confidence interval, .39-1.67). Older age and longer initial BE length were independently associated with recurrence. Conclusions: Recurrent GEJIM after endoscopic eradication of BE was not associated with an increased risk of subsequent dysplasia. Future studies are warranted to determine if observation is appropriate for this finding.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100428263&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85100428263&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.gie.2020.10.027
DO - 10.1016/j.gie.2020.10.027
M3 - Article
C2 - 33144238
AN - SCOPUS:85100428263
JO - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
JF - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
SN - 0016-5107
ER -