Clinical outcomes of patients with delayed diagnosis of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas are commonly missed on imaging or misdiagnosed as inflammatory or neoplastic processes. We reviewed a consecutive series of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas referred to our institution that were missed or misdiagnosed on initial imaging and studied the clinical consequences of missing or misdiagnosing the lesion. Materials and Methods: We reviewed spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas diagnosed at our institution between January 1, 2000, and November 1, 2014. A lesion was defined as "misdiagnosed" if initial MR imaging or CT myelography demonstrated characteristic imaging features of spinal dural arteriovenous fistula but the patient was clinically or radiologically misdiagnosed. Outcomes included length of delay of diagnosis, increased disability (increase in mRS or Aminoff motor disability of-1 point) between initial imaging evaluation and diagnosis date, and posttreatment disability. RESULTS: Fifty-three consecutive spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas that were initially misdiagnosed despite having characteristic imaging findings on MR imaging or CT myelography were included in our study. Eight patients (18.9%) underwent spinal angiography before referral, which was interpreted as having negative findings but was either incomplete (6 cases) or retrospectively demonstrated the spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas (2 cases). The median time of delayed diagnosis was 6 months (interquartile range, 2-14 months). Fifty-one patients (96.2%) had increased disability between the initial study, which demonstrated features of a spinal dural arteriovenous fistula, and diagnosis. Thirty-two patients (60.4%) developed a new requirement for a walker or wheelchair. Following treatment, 21 patients (41.2%) had an improvement of 1 point on the mRS or Aminoff motor disability scale. Conclusions: Delayed diagnosis of spinal dural arteriovenous fistula with characteristic imaging features results in high rates of additional disability that are often irreversible despite surgical or endovascular treatment of the fistula.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)380-386
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology
Volume37
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2016

Fingerprint

Central Nervous System Vascular Malformations
Delayed Diagnosis
Diagnostic Errors
Myelography
Neoplastic Processes
Wheelchairs
Fistula
Angiography
Referral and Consultation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Clinical outcomes of patients with delayed diagnosis of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas. / Brinjikji, Waleed; Nasr, Deena; Morris, J. M.; Rabinstein, Alejandro; Lanzino, G.

In: American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol. 37, No. 2, 01.02.2016, p. 380-386.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5ba5779dc48b4958871a58f4eee938bb,
title = "Clinical outcomes of patients with delayed diagnosis of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas",
abstract = "Background and Purpose: Spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas are commonly missed on imaging or misdiagnosed as inflammatory or neoplastic processes. We reviewed a consecutive series of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas referred to our institution that were missed or misdiagnosed on initial imaging and studied the clinical consequences of missing or misdiagnosing the lesion. Materials and Methods: We reviewed spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas diagnosed at our institution between January 1, 2000, and November 1, 2014. A lesion was defined as {"}misdiagnosed{"} if initial MR imaging or CT myelography demonstrated characteristic imaging features of spinal dural arteriovenous fistula but the patient was clinically or radiologically misdiagnosed. Outcomes included length of delay of diagnosis, increased disability (increase in mRS or Aminoff motor disability of-1 point) between initial imaging evaluation and diagnosis date, and posttreatment disability. RESULTS: Fifty-three consecutive spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas that were initially misdiagnosed despite having characteristic imaging findings on MR imaging or CT myelography were included in our study. Eight patients (18.9{\%}) underwent spinal angiography before referral, which was interpreted as having negative findings but was either incomplete (6 cases) or retrospectively demonstrated the spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas (2 cases). The median time of delayed diagnosis was 6 months (interquartile range, 2-14 months). Fifty-one patients (96.2{\%}) had increased disability between the initial study, which demonstrated features of a spinal dural arteriovenous fistula, and diagnosis. Thirty-two patients (60.4{\%}) developed a new requirement for a walker or wheelchair. Following treatment, 21 patients (41.2{\%}) had an improvement of 1 point on the mRS or Aminoff motor disability scale. Conclusions: Delayed diagnosis of spinal dural arteriovenous fistula with characteristic imaging features results in high rates of additional disability that are often irreversible despite surgical or endovascular treatment of the fistula.",
author = "Waleed Brinjikji and Deena Nasr and Morris, {J. M.} and Alejandro Rabinstein and G. Lanzino",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3174/ajnr.A4504",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "380--386",
journal = "American Journal of Neuroradiology",
issn = "0195-6108",
publisher = "American Society of Neuroradiology",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical outcomes of patients with delayed diagnosis of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas

AU - Brinjikji, Waleed

AU - Nasr, Deena

AU - Morris, J. M.

AU - Rabinstein, Alejandro

AU - Lanzino, G.

PY - 2016/2/1

Y1 - 2016/2/1

N2 - Background and Purpose: Spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas are commonly missed on imaging or misdiagnosed as inflammatory or neoplastic processes. We reviewed a consecutive series of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas referred to our institution that were missed or misdiagnosed on initial imaging and studied the clinical consequences of missing or misdiagnosing the lesion. Materials and Methods: We reviewed spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas diagnosed at our institution between January 1, 2000, and November 1, 2014. A lesion was defined as "misdiagnosed" if initial MR imaging or CT myelography demonstrated characteristic imaging features of spinal dural arteriovenous fistula but the patient was clinically or radiologically misdiagnosed. Outcomes included length of delay of diagnosis, increased disability (increase in mRS or Aminoff motor disability of-1 point) between initial imaging evaluation and diagnosis date, and posttreatment disability. RESULTS: Fifty-three consecutive spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas that were initially misdiagnosed despite having characteristic imaging findings on MR imaging or CT myelography were included in our study. Eight patients (18.9%) underwent spinal angiography before referral, which was interpreted as having negative findings but was either incomplete (6 cases) or retrospectively demonstrated the spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas (2 cases). The median time of delayed diagnosis was 6 months (interquartile range, 2-14 months). Fifty-one patients (96.2%) had increased disability between the initial study, which demonstrated features of a spinal dural arteriovenous fistula, and diagnosis. Thirty-two patients (60.4%) developed a new requirement for a walker or wheelchair. Following treatment, 21 patients (41.2%) had an improvement of 1 point on the mRS or Aminoff motor disability scale. Conclusions: Delayed diagnosis of spinal dural arteriovenous fistula with characteristic imaging features results in high rates of additional disability that are often irreversible despite surgical or endovascular treatment of the fistula.

AB - Background and Purpose: Spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas are commonly missed on imaging or misdiagnosed as inflammatory or neoplastic processes. We reviewed a consecutive series of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas referred to our institution that were missed or misdiagnosed on initial imaging and studied the clinical consequences of missing or misdiagnosing the lesion. Materials and Methods: We reviewed spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas diagnosed at our institution between January 1, 2000, and November 1, 2014. A lesion was defined as "misdiagnosed" if initial MR imaging or CT myelography demonstrated characteristic imaging features of spinal dural arteriovenous fistula but the patient was clinically or radiologically misdiagnosed. Outcomes included length of delay of diagnosis, increased disability (increase in mRS or Aminoff motor disability of-1 point) between initial imaging evaluation and diagnosis date, and posttreatment disability. RESULTS: Fifty-three consecutive spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas that were initially misdiagnosed despite having characteristic imaging findings on MR imaging or CT myelography were included in our study. Eight patients (18.9%) underwent spinal angiography before referral, which was interpreted as having negative findings but was either incomplete (6 cases) or retrospectively demonstrated the spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas (2 cases). The median time of delayed diagnosis was 6 months (interquartile range, 2-14 months). Fifty-one patients (96.2%) had increased disability between the initial study, which demonstrated features of a spinal dural arteriovenous fistula, and diagnosis. Thirty-two patients (60.4%) developed a new requirement for a walker or wheelchair. Following treatment, 21 patients (41.2%) had an improvement of 1 point on the mRS or Aminoff motor disability scale. Conclusions: Delayed diagnosis of spinal dural arteriovenous fistula with characteristic imaging features results in high rates of additional disability that are often irreversible despite surgical or endovascular treatment of the fistula.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84957964570&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84957964570&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3174/ajnr.A4504

DO - 10.3174/ajnr.A4504

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 380

EP - 386

JO - American Journal of Neuroradiology

JF - American Journal of Neuroradiology

SN - 0195-6108

IS - 2

ER -