Clinical outcomes in patients with colon cancer with microsatellite instability of sporadic or familial origin treated with adjuvant FOLFOX with or without cetuximab: A pooled analysis of the PETACC8 and N0147 trials

Aziz Zaanan, Qian Shi, Julien Taieb, Steven R. Alberts, Jeffrey P. Meyers, Thomas C. Smyrk, Catherine Julie, Ayman Zawadi, Josep Tabernero, Enrico Mini, Richard M. Goldberg, Gunnar Folprecht, Jean Luc van Laethem, Karine Le Malicot, Daniel J. Sargent, Pierre Laurent-Puig, Frank A. Sinicrope

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

PURPOSE The microsatellite instability (MSI) or deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) phenotype is usually regarded as a single biologic entity, given the absence of comparative analyses regarding prognosis and response to chemotherapy between sporadic and familial dMMR cancers. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with stage III colon cancers were randomly assigned to FOLFOX (leucovorin, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin) with or without cetuximab in 2 large adjuvant phase III trials (N = 5,577). Among patients with MSI and KRAS exon 2 wild-type (WT) tumors, the prognostic and predictive impacts of sporadic versus familial dMMR cancers and BRAF V600E mutational status were determined. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess disease-free survival (DFS) by treatment arm, adjusting for age, sex, tumor grade, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, pT/pN stage, and primary tumor location. RESULTS Among patients with MSI status with complete data for dMMR mechanism analysis (n = 354), 255 (72%) had sporadic (BRAF mutation and/or MLH1 methylation) and 99 (28%) had familial tumors (BRAF WT and unmethylated MLH1 or loss of MSH2/MSH6/PMS2 protein expression). A large proportion of dMMR sporadic tumors were mutated for BRAF (n = 200). In patients treated with FOLFOX, DFS did not differ statistically by dMMR mechanism, whereas in patients treated with FOLFOX plus cetuximab, those with sporadic tumors had worse DFS than those with familial cancers (multivariable hazard ratio, 2.69; 95% CI, 1.02 to 7.08; P = .04). Considering the predictive utility, the interaction between treatment and dMMR mechanism was significant (P = .03). Furthermore, a nonsignificant trend toward a deleterious effect of adding cetuximab to FOLFOX was observed in patients with BRAF-mutant but not BRAF WT tumors. CONCLUSION The addition of cetuximab to adjuvant FOLFOX was associated with shorter DFS in patients with sporadic dMMR colon cancer. Additional studies are needed to validate these results in metastatic disease.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)116-122
Number of pages7
JournalJCO Precision Oncology
Volume3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2019

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cancer Research
  • Oncology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical outcomes in patients with colon cancer with microsatellite instability of sporadic or familial origin treated with adjuvant FOLFOX with or without cetuximab: A pooled analysis of the PETACC8 and N0147 trials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Zaanan, A., Shi, Q., Taieb, J., Alberts, S. R., Meyers, J. P., Smyrk, T. C., Julie, C., Zawadi, A., Tabernero, J., Mini, E., Goldberg, R. M., Folprecht, G., van Laethem, J. L., Le Malicot, K., Sargent, D. J., Laurent-Puig, P., & Sinicrope, F. A. (2019). Clinical outcomes in patients with colon cancer with microsatellite instability of sporadic or familial origin treated with adjuvant FOLFOX with or without cetuximab: A pooled analysis of the PETACC8 and N0147 trials. JCO Precision Oncology, 3, 116-122. https://doi.org/10.1200/PO.19.00237