Clinical Diagnosis and Management of Hypertension Compared with the Joint National Committee 8 Panelists' Recommendations

David Snipelisky, Oral Waldo, M. Caroline Burton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background The panelists of the Joint National Committee recently published new recommendations for the management of hypertension. Our study aims to evaluate how current practice compares. Hypothesis Current practice likely deviates from the recent JNC 8 panelists' recommendations. Methods A survey was sent to cardiology providers at 3 academic medical centers: Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona; and Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. Providers were asked to select which blood-pressure goal would be deemed appropriate in various cases based on individual practice in both the maintenance of patients already on therapy as well as threshold of when to initiate therapy. Comparisons with current recommendations were made, as well as geographic location and level of experience. Results A total of 251 survey requests were sent (May 2014), and 77 responses (30.7%) were received. Cardiologists tended not to practice according to the new guidelines, with most variation seen in patients age >60 years without comorbidities on active treatment. Providers' selection of initial pharmacologic agents in non-African American patients, African American patients, and patients with diabetes mellitus reflected congruency with guidelines. Conclusions Our study found that clinical practice does not correlate well with the new blood-pressure goal recommendations published by the Joint National Committee 8 panelists, particularly in patients age >60 years. Practitioners are likely to follow the recommendations in regard to pharmacologic management.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)333-343
Number of pages11
JournalClinical Cardiology
Volume38
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

Hypertension
Guidelines
Blood Pressure
Geographic Locations
Cardiology
African Americans
Comorbidity
Diabetes Mellitus
Therapeutics
Maintenance
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Clinical Diagnosis and Management of Hypertension Compared with the Joint National Committee 8 Panelists' Recommendations. / Snipelisky, David; Waldo, Oral; Burton, M. Caroline.

In: Clinical Cardiology, Vol. 38, No. 6, 01.01.2015, p. 333-343.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{82989c9837bf4cadbdbb44b8fd3b5a9d,
title = "Clinical Diagnosis and Management of Hypertension Compared with the Joint National Committee 8 Panelists' Recommendations",
abstract = "Background The panelists of the Joint National Committee recently published new recommendations for the management of hypertension. Our study aims to evaluate how current practice compares. Hypothesis Current practice likely deviates from the recent JNC 8 panelists' recommendations. Methods A survey was sent to cardiology providers at 3 academic medical centers: Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona; and Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. Providers were asked to select which blood-pressure goal would be deemed appropriate in various cases based on individual practice in both the maintenance of patients already on therapy as well as threshold of when to initiate therapy. Comparisons with current recommendations were made, as well as geographic location and level of experience. Results A total of 251 survey requests were sent (May 2014), and 77 responses (30.7{\%}) were received. Cardiologists tended not to practice according to the new guidelines, with most variation seen in patients age >60 years without comorbidities on active treatment. Providers' selection of initial pharmacologic agents in non-African American patients, African American patients, and patients with diabetes mellitus reflected congruency with guidelines. Conclusions Our study found that clinical practice does not correlate well with the new blood-pressure goal recommendations published by the Joint National Committee 8 panelists, particularly in patients age >60 years. Practitioners are likely to follow the recommendations in regard to pharmacologic management.",
author = "David Snipelisky and Oral Waldo and Burton, {M. Caroline}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/clc.22393",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "333--343",
journal = "Clinical Cardiology",
issn = "0160-9289",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical Diagnosis and Management of Hypertension Compared with the Joint National Committee 8 Panelists' Recommendations

AU - Snipelisky, David

AU - Waldo, Oral

AU - Burton, M. Caroline

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Background The panelists of the Joint National Committee recently published new recommendations for the management of hypertension. Our study aims to evaluate how current practice compares. Hypothesis Current practice likely deviates from the recent JNC 8 panelists' recommendations. Methods A survey was sent to cardiology providers at 3 academic medical centers: Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona; and Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. Providers were asked to select which blood-pressure goal would be deemed appropriate in various cases based on individual practice in both the maintenance of patients already on therapy as well as threshold of when to initiate therapy. Comparisons with current recommendations were made, as well as geographic location and level of experience. Results A total of 251 survey requests were sent (May 2014), and 77 responses (30.7%) were received. Cardiologists tended not to practice according to the new guidelines, with most variation seen in patients age >60 years without comorbidities on active treatment. Providers' selection of initial pharmacologic agents in non-African American patients, African American patients, and patients with diabetes mellitus reflected congruency with guidelines. Conclusions Our study found that clinical practice does not correlate well with the new blood-pressure goal recommendations published by the Joint National Committee 8 panelists, particularly in patients age >60 years. Practitioners are likely to follow the recommendations in regard to pharmacologic management.

AB - Background The panelists of the Joint National Committee recently published new recommendations for the management of hypertension. Our study aims to evaluate how current practice compares. Hypothesis Current practice likely deviates from the recent JNC 8 panelists' recommendations. Methods A survey was sent to cardiology providers at 3 academic medical centers: Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona; and Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. Providers were asked to select which blood-pressure goal would be deemed appropriate in various cases based on individual practice in both the maintenance of patients already on therapy as well as threshold of when to initiate therapy. Comparisons with current recommendations were made, as well as geographic location and level of experience. Results A total of 251 survey requests were sent (May 2014), and 77 responses (30.7%) were received. Cardiologists tended not to practice according to the new guidelines, with most variation seen in patients age >60 years without comorbidities on active treatment. Providers' selection of initial pharmacologic agents in non-African American patients, African American patients, and patients with diabetes mellitus reflected congruency with guidelines. Conclusions Our study found that clinical practice does not correlate well with the new blood-pressure goal recommendations published by the Joint National Committee 8 panelists, particularly in patients age >60 years. Practitioners are likely to follow the recommendations in regard to pharmacologic management.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84931958065&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84931958065&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/clc.22393

DO - 10.1002/clc.22393

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 333

EP - 343

JO - Clinical Cardiology

JF - Clinical Cardiology

SN - 0160-9289

IS - 6

ER -