Clinical decision-making in hypertension using an automated (BpTRUTM) measurement device

J. W. Graves, C. Nash, K. Burger, K. Bailey, S. G. Sheps

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

48 Scopus citations

Abstract

Mercury sphygmomanometers are being removed from clinical practice in the United States due to environmental concerns about mercury toxicity. Accurate blood pressure measurement is central to high-quality hypertension management. In this study of 106 patients, the BpTRU™ device was compared to nurse blood pressure measurements that complied with all the JNC VII/American Heart Association guidelines in evaluation of a random casual blood pressure. The intermethod difference in systolic blood pressure was +1.8± 5.1 mmHg, and for diastolic blood pressure it was 4.8 ± 5.1 mmHg (both P±0.001). For the primary study end point of clinical decision-making, there was 92% (97/106) agreement between the hypertension nurse specialist and the BpTRU™ (kappa 0.8280, 95% confidence interval, 0.721-0.9350). The oscillometric blood pressure measurement with the BpTRU™ is recommended as a replacement for poorly performed auscultatory blood pressure measurement in clinical practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)823-827
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Human Hypertension
Volume17
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - 2003

Keywords

  • Automated blood pressure measurement
  • Decision-making
  • Hypertension

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical decision-making in hypertension using an automated (BpTRU<sup>TM</sup>) measurement device'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this