Clinical Application of Noninvasive Vascular Ultrasound in Cardiovascular Risk Stratification: A Report from the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society of Vascular Medicine and Biology

Mary J. Roman, Tasneem Zehra Naqvi, Julius M. Gardin, Marie Gerhard-Herman, Michael Jaff, Emile Mohler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

125 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Noninvasive measures of atherosclerosis have emerged as adjuncts to standard cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors in an attempt to refine risk stratification and the need for more aggressive preventive strategies. Two such approaches, carotid artery imaging and brachial artery reactivity testing (BART), are ultrasound based. Numerous carotid artery imaging protocols have been used, and methodologic aspects are described in detail in this review. The panel recommends that protocols: (1) use end-diastolic (minimum dimension) images for intimal-medial thickness (IMT) measurements; (2) provide separate categorization of plaque presence and IMT; (3) avoid use of a single upper limit of normal for IMT because the measure varies with age, sex, and race; and (4) incorporate lumen measurement, particularly when serial measurements are performed to account for changes in distending pressure. Protocols may vary in the number of segments wherein IMT is measured, whether near wall is measured in addition to far wall, and whether IMT measurements are derived from B-mode or M-mode images, depending on the application. BART is a technique that requires meticulous attention to patient preparation and methodologic detail. Its application is substantially more challenging than is carotid imaging and remains largely a research technique that is not readily translated into routine clinical practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)943-954
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of the American Society of Echocardiography
Volume19
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Tunica Intima
Cardiology
Blood Vessels
Brachial Artery
Carotid Arteries
Atherosclerosis
Research Design
Cardiovascular Diseases
Pressure

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Clinical Application of Noninvasive Vascular Ultrasound in Cardiovascular Risk Stratification : A Report from the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society of Vascular Medicine and Biology. / Roman, Mary J.; Naqvi, Tasneem Zehra; Gardin, Julius M.; Gerhard-Herman, Marie; Jaff, Michael; Mohler, Emile.

In: Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography, Vol. 19, No. 8, 08.2006, p. 943-954.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ef48d9c9f80a4e9f83258668b8f67888,
title = "Clinical Application of Noninvasive Vascular Ultrasound in Cardiovascular Risk Stratification: A Report from the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society of Vascular Medicine and Biology",
abstract = "Noninvasive measures of atherosclerosis have emerged as adjuncts to standard cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors in an attempt to refine risk stratification and the need for more aggressive preventive strategies. Two such approaches, carotid artery imaging and brachial artery reactivity testing (BART), are ultrasound based. Numerous carotid artery imaging protocols have been used, and methodologic aspects are described in detail in this review. The panel recommends that protocols: (1) use end-diastolic (minimum dimension) images for intimal-medial thickness (IMT) measurements; (2) provide separate categorization of plaque presence and IMT; (3) avoid use of a single upper limit of normal for IMT because the measure varies with age, sex, and race; and (4) incorporate lumen measurement, particularly when serial measurements are performed to account for changes in distending pressure. Protocols may vary in the number of segments wherein IMT is measured, whether near wall is measured in addition to far wall, and whether IMT measurements are derived from B-mode or M-mode images, depending on the application. BART is a technique that requires meticulous attention to patient preparation and methodologic detail. Its application is substantially more challenging than is carotid imaging and remains largely a research technique that is not readily translated into routine clinical practice.",
author = "Roman, {Mary J.} and Naqvi, {Tasneem Zehra} and Gardin, {Julius M.} and Marie Gerhard-Herman and Michael Jaff and Emile Mohler",
year = "2006",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/j.echo.2006.04.020",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "943--954",
journal = "Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography",
issn = "0894-7317",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical Application of Noninvasive Vascular Ultrasound in Cardiovascular Risk Stratification

T2 - A Report from the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society of Vascular Medicine and Biology

AU - Roman, Mary J.

AU - Naqvi, Tasneem Zehra

AU - Gardin, Julius M.

AU - Gerhard-Herman, Marie

AU - Jaff, Michael

AU - Mohler, Emile

PY - 2006/8

Y1 - 2006/8

N2 - Noninvasive measures of atherosclerosis have emerged as adjuncts to standard cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors in an attempt to refine risk stratification and the need for more aggressive preventive strategies. Two such approaches, carotid artery imaging and brachial artery reactivity testing (BART), are ultrasound based. Numerous carotid artery imaging protocols have been used, and methodologic aspects are described in detail in this review. The panel recommends that protocols: (1) use end-diastolic (minimum dimension) images for intimal-medial thickness (IMT) measurements; (2) provide separate categorization of plaque presence and IMT; (3) avoid use of a single upper limit of normal for IMT because the measure varies with age, sex, and race; and (4) incorporate lumen measurement, particularly when serial measurements are performed to account for changes in distending pressure. Protocols may vary in the number of segments wherein IMT is measured, whether near wall is measured in addition to far wall, and whether IMT measurements are derived from B-mode or M-mode images, depending on the application. BART is a technique that requires meticulous attention to patient preparation and methodologic detail. Its application is substantially more challenging than is carotid imaging and remains largely a research technique that is not readily translated into routine clinical practice.

AB - Noninvasive measures of atherosclerosis have emerged as adjuncts to standard cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors in an attempt to refine risk stratification and the need for more aggressive preventive strategies. Two such approaches, carotid artery imaging and brachial artery reactivity testing (BART), are ultrasound based. Numerous carotid artery imaging protocols have been used, and methodologic aspects are described in detail in this review. The panel recommends that protocols: (1) use end-diastolic (minimum dimension) images for intimal-medial thickness (IMT) measurements; (2) provide separate categorization of plaque presence and IMT; (3) avoid use of a single upper limit of normal for IMT because the measure varies with age, sex, and race; and (4) incorporate lumen measurement, particularly when serial measurements are performed to account for changes in distending pressure. Protocols may vary in the number of segments wherein IMT is measured, whether near wall is measured in addition to far wall, and whether IMT measurements are derived from B-mode or M-mode images, depending on the application. BART is a technique that requires meticulous attention to patient preparation and methodologic detail. Its application is substantially more challenging than is carotid imaging and remains largely a research technique that is not readily translated into routine clinical practice.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33746346722&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33746346722&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.echo.2006.04.020

DO - 10.1016/j.echo.2006.04.020

M3 - Article

C2 - 16880089

AN - SCOPUS:33746346722

VL - 19

SP - 943

EP - 954

JO - Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography

JF - Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography

SN - 0894-7317

IS - 8

ER -