Clinical and pathological heterogeneity of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3

Hannah P. Yang, Rosemary E. Zuna, Mark Schiffman, Joan L. Walker, Mark E. Sherman, Lisa M. Landrum, Katherine Moxley, Michael A. Gold, S. Terence Dunn, Richard A. Allen, Roy Zhang, Rodney Long, Sophia S. Wang, Nicolas Wentzensen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3), the immediate cervical cancer precursor, is a target of cervical cancer prevention. However, less than half of CIN3s will progress to cancer. Routine treatment of all CIN3s and the majority of CIN2s may lead to overtreatment of many lesions that would not progress. To improve our understanding of CIN3 natural history, we performed a detailed characterization of CIN3 heterogeneity in a large referral population in the US. Methods: We examined 309 CIN3 cases in the SUCCEED, a large population-based study of women with abnormal cervical cancer screening results. Histology information for 12 individual loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) segments was evaluated for each woman. We performed case-case comparisons of CIN3s to analyze determinants of heterogeneity and screening test performance. Results: CIN3 cases varied substantially by size (1-10 LEEP segments) and by presentation with concomitant CIN2 and CIN1. All grades of CINs were equally distributed over the cervical surface. In half of the women, CIN3 lesions were found as multiple distinct lesions on the cervix. Women with large and solitary CIN3 lesions were more likely to be older, have longer sexual activity span, and have fewer multiple high risk HPV infections. Screening frequency, but not HPV16 positivity, was an important predictor of CIN3 size. Large CIN3 lesions were also characterized by high-grade clinical test results. Conclusions: We demonstrate substantial heterogeneity in clinical and pathological presentation of CIN3 in a US population. Time since sexual debut and participation in screening were predictors of CIN3 size. We did not observe a preferential site of CIN3 on the cervical surface that could serve as a target for cervical biopsy. Cervical cancer screening procedures were more likely to detect larger CIN3s, suggesting that CIN3s detected by multiple independent diagnostic tests may represent cases with increased risk of invasion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere29051
JournalPloS one
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 13 2012

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • General

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical and pathological heterogeneity of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Yang, H. P., Zuna, R. E., Schiffman, M., Walker, J. L., Sherman, M. E., Landrum, L. M., Moxley, K., Gold, M. A., Dunn, S. T., Allen, R. A., Zhang, R., Long, R., Wang, S. S., & Wentzensen, N. (2012). Clinical and pathological heterogeneity of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3. PloS one, 7(1), [e29051]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029051