Clinical, anatomic, and procedural durability of carotid revascularization

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Carotid endarterectomy and carotid angioplasty with stenting are 2 common approaches to revascularization. Phase III randomized clinical trials have focused on comparisons of periprocedural outcomes and composite outcomes that combine procedural events and clinical events during follow-up. The comparison of outcomes beyond the perioperative risk period, where the principal concern is durability, defined in clinical, anatomic, and procedural terms, has received less attention. The purpose of this review is to discuss factors that may influence durability and to compare the durability of carotid revascularization techniques beyond the perioperative period using data from randomized clinical trials.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)218-226
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
Volume22
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2013

Fingerprint

Perioperative Period
Randomized Controlled Trials
Phase III Clinical Trials
Carotid Endarterectomy
Angioplasty

Keywords

  • Carotid angioplasty
  • carotid endarterectomy
  • carotid stenosis
  • carotid stent
  • restenosis
  • stroke prevention

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Surgery
  • Rehabilitation
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

@article{c2cd187506034d32be6c73cd71e49228,
title = "Clinical, anatomic, and procedural durability of carotid revascularization",
abstract = "Carotid endarterectomy and carotid angioplasty with stenting are 2 common approaches to revascularization. Phase III randomized clinical trials have focused on comparisons of periprocedural outcomes and composite outcomes that combine procedural events and clinical events during follow-up. The comparison of outcomes beyond the perioperative risk period, where the principal concern is durability, defined in clinical, anatomic, and procedural terms, has received less attention. The purpose of this review is to discuss factors that may influence durability and to compare the durability of carotid revascularization techniques beyond the perioperative period using data from randomized clinical trials.",
keywords = "Carotid angioplasty, carotid endarterectomy, carotid stenosis, carotid stent, restenosis, stroke prevention",
author = "Barrett, {Kevin M} and Ossi, {Raid G.} and Brott, {Thomas G} and Meschia, {James F}",
year = "2013",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2011.08.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "218--226",
journal = "Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases",
issn = "1052-3057",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical, anatomic, and procedural durability of carotid revascularization

AU - Barrett, Kevin M

AU - Ossi, Raid G.

AU - Brott, Thomas G

AU - Meschia, James F

PY - 2013/4

Y1 - 2013/4

N2 - Carotid endarterectomy and carotid angioplasty with stenting are 2 common approaches to revascularization. Phase III randomized clinical trials have focused on comparisons of periprocedural outcomes and composite outcomes that combine procedural events and clinical events during follow-up. The comparison of outcomes beyond the perioperative risk period, where the principal concern is durability, defined in clinical, anatomic, and procedural terms, has received less attention. The purpose of this review is to discuss factors that may influence durability and to compare the durability of carotid revascularization techniques beyond the perioperative period using data from randomized clinical trials.

AB - Carotid endarterectomy and carotid angioplasty with stenting are 2 common approaches to revascularization. Phase III randomized clinical trials have focused on comparisons of periprocedural outcomes and composite outcomes that combine procedural events and clinical events during follow-up. The comparison of outcomes beyond the perioperative risk period, where the principal concern is durability, defined in clinical, anatomic, and procedural terms, has received less attention. The purpose of this review is to discuss factors that may influence durability and to compare the durability of carotid revascularization techniques beyond the perioperative period using data from randomized clinical trials.

KW - Carotid angioplasty

KW - carotid endarterectomy

KW - carotid stenosis

KW - carotid stent

KW - restenosis

KW - stroke prevention

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875147084&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875147084&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2011.08.002

DO - 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2011.08.002

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 218

EP - 226

JO - Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases

JF - Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases

SN - 1052-3057

IS - 3

ER -