Clinical, anatomic, and procedural durability of carotid revascularization

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Carotid endarterectomy and carotid angioplasty with stenting are 2 common approaches to revascularization. Phase III randomized clinical trials have focused on comparisons of periprocedural outcomes and composite outcomes that combine procedural events and clinical events during follow-up. The comparison of outcomes beyond the perioperative risk period, where the principal concern is durability, defined in clinical, anatomic, and procedural terms, has received less attention. The purpose of this review is to discuss factors that may influence durability and to compare the durability of carotid revascularization techniques beyond the perioperative period using data from randomized clinical trials.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)218-226
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
Volume22
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2013

Keywords

  • Carotid angioplasty
  • carotid endarterectomy
  • carotid stenosis
  • carotid stent
  • restenosis
  • stroke prevention

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Rehabilitation
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical, anatomic, and procedural durability of carotid revascularization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this