Clinical acceptance testing and scanner comparison of ultrasound shear wave elastography

Zaiyang Long, Donald J. Tradup, Pengfei Song, Scott F. Stekel, Shigao D Chen, Katrina Nesta Glazebrook, Nicholas J. Hangiandreou

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Because of the rapidly growing use of ultrasound shear wave elastography (SWE) in clinical practices, there is a significant need for development of clinical physics performance assessment methods for this technology. This study aims to report two clinical medical physicists' tasks: (a) acceptance testing (AT) of SWE function on ten commercial ultrasound systems for clinical liver application and (b) comparison of SWE measurements of targets across vendors for clinical musculoskeletal application. For AT, ten GE LOGIQ E9 XDclear 2.0 scanners with ten C1-6-D and ten 9L-D transducers were studied using two commercial homogenous phantoms. Five measurements were acquired at two depths for each scanner/transducer pair by two operators. Additional tests were performed to access effects of different coupling media, phantom locations and operators. System deviations were less than 5% of group mean or three times standard deviation; therefore, all systems passed AT. A test protocol was provided based on results that no statistically significant difference was observed between using ultrasound gel and salt water for coupling, among different phantom locations, and that interoperator and intraoperator coefficient of variation was less than 3%. For SWE target measurements, two systems were compared - a Supersonic Aixplorer scanner with a SL10-2 and a SL15-4 transducer, and an abovementioned GE scanner with 9L-D transducer. Two stepped cylinders with diameters of 4.05-10.40 mm were measured both longitudinally and transaxially. Target shear wave speed quantification was performed using an in-house MATLAB program. Using the target shear wave speed deduced from phantom specs as a reference, SL15-4 performed the best at the measured depth. However, it was challenging to reliably measure a 4.05 mm target for either system. The reported test methods and results could provide important information when dealing with SWE-related tasks in the clinical environment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Elasticity Imaging Techniques
Shear waves
acceptability
scanners
S waves
Transducers
Ultrasonics
Testing
transducers
Biomedical Technology Assessment
Physics
operators
Saline water
Salts
Gels
Wave functions
Ultrasonic Waves
liver
Liver
MATLAB

Keywords

  • Acceptance testing
  • GE
  • Shear wave elastography
  • Supersonic
  • Target measurements
  • Ultrasound

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiation
  • Instrumentation
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Clinical acceptance testing and scanner comparison of ultrasound shear wave elastography. / Long, Zaiyang; Tradup, Donald J.; Song, Pengfei; Stekel, Scott F.; Chen, Shigao D; Glazebrook, Katrina Nesta; Hangiandreou, Nicholas J.

In: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{23ad023ec108441d803c65835996d9ed,
title = "Clinical acceptance testing and scanner comparison of ultrasound shear wave elastography",
abstract = "Because of the rapidly growing use of ultrasound shear wave elastography (SWE) in clinical practices, there is a significant need for development of clinical physics performance assessment methods for this technology. This study aims to report two clinical medical physicists' tasks: (a) acceptance testing (AT) of SWE function on ten commercial ultrasound systems for clinical liver application and (b) comparison of SWE measurements of targets across vendors for clinical musculoskeletal application. For AT, ten GE LOGIQ E9 XDclear 2.0 scanners with ten C1-6-D and ten 9L-D transducers were studied using two commercial homogenous phantoms. Five measurements were acquired at two depths for each scanner/transducer pair by two operators. Additional tests were performed to access effects of different coupling media, phantom locations and operators. System deviations were less than 5{\%} of group mean or three times standard deviation; therefore, all systems passed AT. A test protocol was provided based on results that no statistically significant difference was observed between using ultrasound gel and salt water for coupling, among different phantom locations, and that interoperator and intraoperator coefficient of variation was less than 3{\%}. For SWE target measurements, two systems were compared - a Supersonic Aixplorer scanner with a SL10-2 and a SL15-4 transducer, and an abovementioned GE scanner with 9L-D transducer. Two stepped cylinders with diameters of 4.05-10.40 mm were measured both longitudinally and transaxially. Target shear wave speed quantification was performed using an in-house MATLAB program. Using the target shear wave speed deduced from phantom specs as a reference, SL15-4 performed the best at the measured depth. However, it was challenging to reliably measure a 4.05 mm target for either system. The reported test methods and results could provide important information when dealing with SWE-related tasks in the clinical environment.",
keywords = "Acceptance testing, GE, Shear wave elastography, Supersonic, Target measurements, Ultrasound",
author = "Zaiyang Long and Tradup, {Donald J.} and Pengfei Song and Stekel, {Scott F.} and Chen, {Shigao D} and Glazebrook, {Katrina Nesta} and Hangiandreou, {Nicholas J.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/acm2.12310",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics",
issn = "1526-9914",
publisher = "American Institute of Physics Publising LLC",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical acceptance testing and scanner comparison of ultrasound shear wave elastography

AU - Long, Zaiyang

AU - Tradup, Donald J.

AU - Song, Pengfei

AU - Stekel, Scott F.

AU - Chen, Shigao D

AU - Glazebrook, Katrina Nesta

AU - Hangiandreou, Nicholas J.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Because of the rapidly growing use of ultrasound shear wave elastography (SWE) in clinical practices, there is a significant need for development of clinical physics performance assessment methods for this technology. This study aims to report two clinical medical physicists' tasks: (a) acceptance testing (AT) of SWE function on ten commercial ultrasound systems for clinical liver application and (b) comparison of SWE measurements of targets across vendors for clinical musculoskeletal application. For AT, ten GE LOGIQ E9 XDclear 2.0 scanners with ten C1-6-D and ten 9L-D transducers were studied using two commercial homogenous phantoms. Five measurements were acquired at two depths for each scanner/transducer pair by two operators. Additional tests were performed to access effects of different coupling media, phantom locations and operators. System deviations were less than 5% of group mean or three times standard deviation; therefore, all systems passed AT. A test protocol was provided based on results that no statistically significant difference was observed between using ultrasound gel and salt water for coupling, among different phantom locations, and that interoperator and intraoperator coefficient of variation was less than 3%. For SWE target measurements, two systems were compared - a Supersonic Aixplorer scanner with a SL10-2 and a SL15-4 transducer, and an abovementioned GE scanner with 9L-D transducer. Two stepped cylinders with diameters of 4.05-10.40 mm were measured both longitudinally and transaxially. Target shear wave speed quantification was performed using an in-house MATLAB program. Using the target shear wave speed deduced from phantom specs as a reference, SL15-4 performed the best at the measured depth. However, it was challenging to reliably measure a 4.05 mm target for either system. The reported test methods and results could provide important information when dealing with SWE-related tasks in the clinical environment.

AB - Because of the rapidly growing use of ultrasound shear wave elastography (SWE) in clinical practices, there is a significant need for development of clinical physics performance assessment methods for this technology. This study aims to report two clinical medical physicists' tasks: (a) acceptance testing (AT) of SWE function on ten commercial ultrasound systems for clinical liver application and (b) comparison of SWE measurements of targets across vendors for clinical musculoskeletal application. For AT, ten GE LOGIQ E9 XDclear 2.0 scanners with ten C1-6-D and ten 9L-D transducers were studied using two commercial homogenous phantoms. Five measurements were acquired at two depths for each scanner/transducer pair by two operators. Additional tests were performed to access effects of different coupling media, phantom locations and operators. System deviations were less than 5% of group mean or three times standard deviation; therefore, all systems passed AT. A test protocol was provided based on results that no statistically significant difference was observed between using ultrasound gel and salt water for coupling, among different phantom locations, and that interoperator and intraoperator coefficient of variation was less than 3%. For SWE target measurements, two systems were compared - a Supersonic Aixplorer scanner with a SL10-2 and a SL15-4 transducer, and an abovementioned GE scanner with 9L-D transducer. Two stepped cylinders with diameters of 4.05-10.40 mm were measured both longitudinally and transaxially. Target shear wave speed quantification was performed using an in-house MATLAB program. Using the target shear wave speed deduced from phantom specs as a reference, SL15-4 performed the best at the measured depth. However, it was challenging to reliably measure a 4.05 mm target for either system. The reported test methods and results could provide important information when dealing with SWE-related tasks in the clinical environment.

KW - Acceptance testing

KW - GE

KW - Shear wave elastography

KW - Supersonic

KW - Target measurements

KW - Ultrasound

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85043688797&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85043688797&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/acm2.12310

DO - 10.1002/acm2.12310

M3 - Article

C2 - 29542277

AN - SCOPUS:85043688797

JO - Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics

JF - Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics

SN - 1526-9914

ER -