TY - JOUR
T1 - Chronic neutrophilic leukemia
T2 - 2018 update on diagnosis, molecular genetics and management
AU - Elliott, Michelle A.
AU - Tefferi, Ayalew
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
PY - 2018/4
Y1 - 2018/4
N2 - Disease Overview and Diagnosis: Chronic neutrophilic leukemia (CNL) is a potentially aggressive myeloproliferative neoplasm, for which current WHO diagnostic criteria include leukocytosis of ≥ 25 x 10 9 /L of which ≥ 80% are neutrophils, with < 10% circulating neutrophil precursors with blasts rarely observed. In addition, there is no dysplasia, nor clinical or molecular criteria for other myeloproliferative neoplasms. Update on Diagnosis: Previously the diagnosis of CNL was often as one of exclusion based on no identifiable cause for physiologic neutrophilia in patients fulfilling the aforementioned criteria. The 2016 WHO classification now recognizes somatic activating mutations of CSF3R (most commonly CSF3RT618I) as diagnostic, allowing for an accurate diagnosis for the majority of suspected cases through molecular testing. These mutations are primary driver mutations, accounting for the characteristic clinical phenotype and potential susceptibility to molecularly targeted therapy. Risk Stratification: Concurrent mutations, common to myeloid neoplasms and their precursor states, most frequently in SETBP1 and ASXL1, are frequent and appear to be of prognostic significance. Although data are evolving on the full genomic profile, the rarity of CNL has delayed complete understanding of its full molecular pathogenesis and individual patient prognosis.
AB - Disease Overview and Diagnosis: Chronic neutrophilic leukemia (CNL) is a potentially aggressive myeloproliferative neoplasm, for which current WHO diagnostic criteria include leukocytosis of ≥ 25 x 10 9 /L of which ≥ 80% are neutrophils, with < 10% circulating neutrophil precursors with blasts rarely observed. In addition, there is no dysplasia, nor clinical or molecular criteria for other myeloproliferative neoplasms. Update on Diagnosis: Previously the diagnosis of CNL was often as one of exclusion based on no identifiable cause for physiologic neutrophilia in patients fulfilling the aforementioned criteria. The 2016 WHO classification now recognizes somatic activating mutations of CSF3R (most commonly CSF3RT618I) as diagnostic, allowing for an accurate diagnosis for the majority of suspected cases through molecular testing. These mutations are primary driver mutations, accounting for the characteristic clinical phenotype and potential susceptibility to molecularly targeted therapy. Risk Stratification: Concurrent mutations, common to myeloid neoplasms and their precursor states, most frequently in SETBP1 and ASXL1, are frequent and appear to be of prognostic significance. Although data are evolving on the full genomic profile, the rarity of CNL has delayed complete understanding of its full molecular pathogenesis and individual patient prognosis.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042930528&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042930528&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/ajh.24983
DO - 10.1002/ajh.24983
M3 - Article
C2 - 29512199
AN - SCOPUS:85042930528
SN - 0361-8609
VL - 93
SP - 578
EP - 587
JO - American Journal of Hematology
JF - American Journal of Hematology
IS - 4
ER -