Chronic natural killer cell lymphocytosis: A descriptive clinical study

Ayalew Tefferi, Chin Yang Li, Thomas E. Witzig, Madav V. Dhodapkar, Scott H. Okuno, Robert L. Phyliky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

124 Scopus citations

Abstract

We review the clinical manifestations and long-term outlook of patients with chronic natural killer (NK) cell lymphocytosis. After reviewing more than 1,500 peripheral blood lymphoid flow cytometry reports and molecular genetics data from patients with suspected large granular lymphocyte (LGL) proliferation, we identified 10 patients (median age at diagnosis, 60 years; range, 35 to 76 years; male:female ratio, 3:2) with persistent (greater than 6 months) increase in phenotypically determined NK cells (CD3-CD16+). Southern blot analysis performed on 9 patients showed no clonal T-cell receptor gene rearrangements. Disease duration was measured from time of initial recognition of LGL or NK cell excess (greater than 40% of the lymphocyte fraction). Clinical data from these 10 patients were compared with those from 68 patients with T-cell LGL (T-LGL) leukemia. Currently, all patients are alive (median disease duration, 5 years; range, 0.8 to 8 years). Associated disease manifestations included pure red blood cell aplasia, recurrent neutropenia, recurrent neutropenic sepsis, and vasculitic syndromes, all of which were responsive to immunosuppressive therapy. No patient had palpable lymphadenopathy or splenomegaly. Compared with the patients with T-LGL leukemia, patients with chronic NK cell leukemia had similar lymphocyte counts, associated conditions, treatment responses, and survival but had less neutropenia and anemia.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2721-2725
Number of pages5
JournalBlood
Volume84
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 15 1994

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry
  • Immunology
  • Hematology
  • Cell Biology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Chronic natural killer cell lymphocytosis: A descriptive clinical study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this