Characteristics and Consequences of Work-Related Musculoskeletal Pain among Cardiac Sonographers Compared with Peer Employees: A Multisite Cross-Sectional Study

Sergio Barros-Gomes, Nicholas Orme, Lara F. Nhola, Christopher Scott, Karen Helfinstine, Sorin V. Pislaru, Garvan M Kane, Mandeep Singh, Patricia Pellikka

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Work-related musculoskeletal pain (WRMSP) among cardiac sonographers has been incompletely studied. The aim of this study was to compare the frequency, magnitude, and impact of WRMSP among cardiac sonographers with those of a control group of peer employees. Methods: An electronic survey was sent to cardiac sonographers and peer employees assigned to different occupational exposures within the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine at 10 Mayo Clinic facilities in four states. Results: A total of 416 subjects completed the survey: 111 sonographers (27%) and 305 peer-employee control subjects (73%). The mean age was 43 ± 11 years, and 307 subjects (74%) were women. The sonographers' response rate was 86%. WRMSP was experienced by a large majority of sonographers (95 [86%] vs 140 [46%] for control subjects, P < .001). This association persisted after multivariate adjustment (odds ratio, 8.18; 95% confidence interval, 4.33–15.46; P < .001). Compared with coworkers, sonographers' pain was perceived as more severe (pain score > 5 on a 10-point scale; 62% vs 29%, P < .001) and as getting worse (14% vs 2%, P < .001). The neck (58% vs 25%), shoulder (51% vs 11%), lower back (44% vs 26%), and hand (42% vs 9%) were the most frequently affected body regions (P < .001 for each). The presence of WRMSP in sonographers was more often associated with interference in performance of daily (37% vs 12%, P < .001) and work-related (42% vs 11%, P < .001) activities. Because of pain, sonographers more often sought medical evaluation (27% vs 12%, P < .001), missed work (13% vs 4%, P < .001), had work restrictions (5% vs 0.6%, P = .005), and were considering changing employment (9% vs 0.5%, P < .001) compared with control subjects. Conclusions: WRMSP in cardiac sonographers is much more prevalent and severe compared with peer employees. WRMSP in sonographers affects daily and work-related activities, as well as future employment plans. Further studies assessing the potential role of preventive interventions are needed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of the American Society of Echocardiography
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Musculoskeletal Pain
Cross-Sectional Studies
Body Regions
Occupational Exposure
Neck
Hand
Medicine
Pain
Control Groups

Keywords

  • Echocardiography
  • Ergonomics
  • Occupational pain
  • Ultrasound
  • Work-related musculoskeletal disorders

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Characteristics and Consequences of Work-Related Musculoskeletal Pain among Cardiac Sonographers Compared with Peer Employees : A Multisite Cross-Sectional Study. / Barros-Gomes, Sergio; Orme, Nicholas; Nhola, Lara F.; Scott, Christopher; Helfinstine, Karen; Pislaru, Sorin V.; Kane, Garvan M; Singh, Mandeep; Pellikka, Patricia.

In: Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{caa24303a1a94297977ba0e7be74ba41,
title = "Characteristics and Consequences of Work-Related Musculoskeletal Pain among Cardiac Sonographers Compared with Peer Employees: A Multisite Cross-Sectional Study",
abstract = "Background: Work-related musculoskeletal pain (WRMSP) among cardiac sonographers has been incompletely studied. The aim of this study was to compare the frequency, magnitude, and impact of WRMSP among cardiac sonographers with those of a control group of peer employees. Methods: An electronic survey was sent to cardiac sonographers and peer employees assigned to different occupational exposures within the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine at 10 Mayo Clinic facilities in four states. Results: A total of 416 subjects completed the survey: 111 sonographers (27{\%}) and 305 peer-employee control subjects (73{\%}). The mean age was 43 ± 11 years, and 307 subjects (74{\%}) were women. The sonographers' response rate was 86{\%}. WRMSP was experienced by a large majority of sonographers (95 [86{\%}] vs 140 [46{\%}] for control subjects, P < .001). This association persisted after multivariate adjustment (odds ratio, 8.18; 95{\%} confidence interval, 4.33–15.46; P < .001). Compared with coworkers, sonographers' pain was perceived as more severe (pain score > 5 on a 10-point scale; 62{\%} vs 29{\%}, P < .001) and as getting worse (14{\%} vs 2{\%}, P < .001). The neck (58{\%} vs 25{\%}), shoulder (51{\%} vs 11{\%}), lower back (44{\%} vs 26{\%}), and hand (42{\%} vs 9{\%}) were the most frequently affected body regions (P < .001 for each). The presence of WRMSP in sonographers was more often associated with interference in performance of daily (37{\%} vs 12{\%}, P < .001) and work-related (42{\%} vs 11{\%}, P < .001) activities. Because of pain, sonographers more often sought medical evaluation (27{\%} vs 12{\%}, P < .001), missed work (13{\%} vs 4{\%}, P < .001), had work restrictions (5{\%} vs 0.6{\%}, P = .005), and were considering changing employment (9{\%} vs 0.5{\%}, P < .001) compared with control subjects. Conclusions: WRMSP in cardiac sonographers is much more prevalent and severe compared with peer employees. WRMSP in sonographers affects daily and work-related activities, as well as future employment plans. Further studies assessing the potential role of preventive interventions are needed.",
keywords = "Echocardiography, Ergonomics, Occupational pain, Ultrasound, Work-related musculoskeletal disorders",
author = "Sergio Barros-Gomes and Nicholas Orme and Nhola, {Lara F.} and Christopher Scott and Karen Helfinstine and Pislaru, {Sorin V.} and Kane, {Garvan M} and Mandeep Singh and Patricia Pellikka",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.echo.2019.04.416",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography",
issn = "0894-7317",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Characteristics and Consequences of Work-Related Musculoskeletal Pain among Cardiac Sonographers Compared with Peer Employees

T2 - A Multisite Cross-Sectional Study

AU - Barros-Gomes, Sergio

AU - Orme, Nicholas

AU - Nhola, Lara F.

AU - Scott, Christopher

AU - Helfinstine, Karen

AU - Pislaru, Sorin V.

AU - Kane, Garvan M

AU - Singh, Mandeep

AU - Pellikka, Patricia

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Background: Work-related musculoskeletal pain (WRMSP) among cardiac sonographers has been incompletely studied. The aim of this study was to compare the frequency, magnitude, and impact of WRMSP among cardiac sonographers with those of a control group of peer employees. Methods: An electronic survey was sent to cardiac sonographers and peer employees assigned to different occupational exposures within the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine at 10 Mayo Clinic facilities in four states. Results: A total of 416 subjects completed the survey: 111 sonographers (27%) and 305 peer-employee control subjects (73%). The mean age was 43 ± 11 years, and 307 subjects (74%) were women. The sonographers' response rate was 86%. WRMSP was experienced by a large majority of sonographers (95 [86%] vs 140 [46%] for control subjects, P < .001). This association persisted after multivariate adjustment (odds ratio, 8.18; 95% confidence interval, 4.33–15.46; P < .001). Compared with coworkers, sonographers' pain was perceived as more severe (pain score > 5 on a 10-point scale; 62% vs 29%, P < .001) and as getting worse (14% vs 2%, P < .001). The neck (58% vs 25%), shoulder (51% vs 11%), lower back (44% vs 26%), and hand (42% vs 9%) were the most frequently affected body regions (P < .001 for each). The presence of WRMSP in sonographers was more often associated with interference in performance of daily (37% vs 12%, P < .001) and work-related (42% vs 11%, P < .001) activities. Because of pain, sonographers more often sought medical evaluation (27% vs 12%, P < .001), missed work (13% vs 4%, P < .001), had work restrictions (5% vs 0.6%, P = .005), and were considering changing employment (9% vs 0.5%, P < .001) compared with control subjects. Conclusions: WRMSP in cardiac sonographers is much more prevalent and severe compared with peer employees. WRMSP in sonographers affects daily and work-related activities, as well as future employment plans. Further studies assessing the potential role of preventive interventions are needed.

AB - Background: Work-related musculoskeletal pain (WRMSP) among cardiac sonographers has been incompletely studied. The aim of this study was to compare the frequency, magnitude, and impact of WRMSP among cardiac sonographers with those of a control group of peer employees. Methods: An electronic survey was sent to cardiac sonographers and peer employees assigned to different occupational exposures within the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine at 10 Mayo Clinic facilities in four states. Results: A total of 416 subjects completed the survey: 111 sonographers (27%) and 305 peer-employee control subjects (73%). The mean age was 43 ± 11 years, and 307 subjects (74%) were women. The sonographers' response rate was 86%. WRMSP was experienced by a large majority of sonographers (95 [86%] vs 140 [46%] for control subjects, P < .001). This association persisted after multivariate adjustment (odds ratio, 8.18; 95% confidence interval, 4.33–15.46; P < .001). Compared with coworkers, sonographers' pain was perceived as more severe (pain score > 5 on a 10-point scale; 62% vs 29%, P < .001) and as getting worse (14% vs 2%, P < .001). The neck (58% vs 25%), shoulder (51% vs 11%), lower back (44% vs 26%), and hand (42% vs 9%) were the most frequently affected body regions (P < .001 for each). The presence of WRMSP in sonographers was more often associated with interference in performance of daily (37% vs 12%, P < .001) and work-related (42% vs 11%, P < .001) activities. Because of pain, sonographers more often sought medical evaluation (27% vs 12%, P < .001), missed work (13% vs 4%, P < .001), had work restrictions (5% vs 0.6%, P = .005), and were considering changing employment (9% vs 0.5%, P < .001) compared with control subjects. Conclusions: WRMSP in cardiac sonographers is much more prevalent and severe compared with peer employees. WRMSP in sonographers affects daily and work-related activities, as well as future employment plans. Further studies assessing the potential role of preventive interventions are needed.

KW - Echocardiography

KW - Ergonomics

KW - Occupational pain

KW - Ultrasound

KW - Work-related musculoskeletal disorders

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067313217&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067313217&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.echo.2019.04.416

DO - 10.1016/j.echo.2019.04.416

M3 - Article

C2 - 31227328

AN - SCOPUS:85067313217

JO - Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography

JF - Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography

SN - 0894-7317

ER -