Changing conversations in primary care for patients living with chronic conditions: Pilot and feasibility study of the ICAN Discussion Aid

Kasey R. Boehmer, Claudia C. Dobler, Anjali Thota, Megan Branda, Rachel Giblon, Emma Behnken, Paige Organick, Summer Allen, Kevin Shaw, Victor Manuel Montori

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose To pilot test the impact of the ICAN Discussion Aid on clinical encounters. Methods A pre-post study involving 11 clinicians and 100 patients was conducted at two primary care clinics within a single health system in the Midwest. The study examined clinicians' perceptions about ICAN feasibility, patients' and clinicians' perceptions about encounter success, videographic differences in encounter topics, and medication adherence 6 months after an ICAN encounter. Results 39/40 control encounters and 45/60 ICAN encounters yielded usable data. Clinicians reported ICAN use was feasible. In ICAN encounters, patients discussed diet, being active and taking medications more. Clinicians scored themselves poorer regarding visit success than their patients scored them; this effect was more pronounced in ICAN encounters. ICAN did not improve 6-month medication adherence or lengthen visits. Conclusion This pilot study suggests that using ICAN in primary care is feasible, efficient and capable of modifying conversations. With lessons learned in this pilot, we are conducting a randomised trial of ICAN versus usual care in diverse clinical settings. Trial registration number NCT02390570.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere29105
JournalBMJ open
Volume9
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2019

Fingerprint

Feasibility Studies
Primary Health Care
Medication Adherence
Diet
Health

Keywords

  • chronic disease
  • healthcare communication
  • minimally disruptive medicine
  • multimorbidity
  • patient-centred care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Changing conversations in primary care for patients living with chronic conditions : Pilot and feasibility study of the ICAN Discussion Aid. / Boehmer, Kasey R.; Dobler, Claudia C.; Thota, Anjali; Branda, Megan; Giblon, Rachel; Behnken, Emma; Organick, Paige; Allen, Summer; Shaw, Kevin; Montori, Victor Manuel.

In: BMJ open, Vol. 9, No. 9, e29105, 01.09.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Boehmer, Kasey R. ; Dobler, Claudia C. ; Thota, Anjali ; Branda, Megan ; Giblon, Rachel ; Behnken, Emma ; Organick, Paige ; Allen, Summer ; Shaw, Kevin ; Montori, Victor Manuel. / Changing conversations in primary care for patients living with chronic conditions : Pilot and feasibility study of the ICAN Discussion Aid. In: BMJ open. 2019 ; Vol. 9, No. 9.
@article{b5a6efa3d244481fab064a90a74b2dc1,
title = "Changing conversations in primary care for patients living with chronic conditions: Pilot and feasibility study of the ICAN Discussion Aid",
abstract = "Purpose To pilot test the impact of the ICAN Discussion Aid on clinical encounters. Methods A pre-post study involving 11 clinicians and 100 patients was conducted at two primary care clinics within a single health system in the Midwest. The study examined clinicians' perceptions about ICAN feasibility, patients' and clinicians' perceptions about encounter success, videographic differences in encounter topics, and medication adherence 6 months after an ICAN encounter. Results 39/40 control encounters and 45/60 ICAN encounters yielded usable data. Clinicians reported ICAN use was feasible. In ICAN encounters, patients discussed diet, being active and taking medications more. Clinicians scored themselves poorer regarding visit success than their patients scored them; this effect was more pronounced in ICAN encounters. ICAN did not improve 6-month medication adherence or lengthen visits. Conclusion This pilot study suggests that using ICAN in primary care is feasible, efficient and capable of modifying conversations. With lessons learned in this pilot, we are conducting a randomised trial of ICAN versus usual care in diverse clinical settings. Trial registration number NCT02390570.",
keywords = "chronic disease, healthcare communication, minimally disruptive medicine, multimorbidity, patient-centred care",
author = "Boehmer, {Kasey R.} and Dobler, {Claudia C.} and Anjali Thota and Megan Branda and Rachel Giblon and Emma Behnken and Paige Organick and Summer Allen and Kevin Shaw and Montori, {Victor Manuel}",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029105",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
journal = "BMJ Open",
issn = "2044-6055",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Changing conversations in primary care for patients living with chronic conditions

T2 - Pilot and feasibility study of the ICAN Discussion Aid

AU - Boehmer, Kasey R.

AU - Dobler, Claudia C.

AU - Thota, Anjali

AU - Branda, Megan

AU - Giblon, Rachel

AU - Behnken, Emma

AU - Organick, Paige

AU - Allen, Summer

AU - Shaw, Kevin

AU - Montori, Victor Manuel

PY - 2019/9/1

Y1 - 2019/9/1

N2 - Purpose To pilot test the impact of the ICAN Discussion Aid on clinical encounters. Methods A pre-post study involving 11 clinicians and 100 patients was conducted at two primary care clinics within a single health system in the Midwest. The study examined clinicians' perceptions about ICAN feasibility, patients' and clinicians' perceptions about encounter success, videographic differences in encounter topics, and medication adherence 6 months after an ICAN encounter. Results 39/40 control encounters and 45/60 ICAN encounters yielded usable data. Clinicians reported ICAN use was feasible. In ICAN encounters, patients discussed diet, being active and taking medications more. Clinicians scored themselves poorer regarding visit success than their patients scored them; this effect was more pronounced in ICAN encounters. ICAN did not improve 6-month medication adherence or lengthen visits. Conclusion This pilot study suggests that using ICAN in primary care is feasible, efficient and capable of modifying conversations. With lessons learned in this pilot, we are conducting a randomised trial of ICAN versus usual care in diverse clinical settings. Trial registration number NCT02390570.

AB - Purpose To pilot test the impact of the ICAN Discussion Aid on clinical encounters. Methods A pre-post study involving 11 clinicians and 100 patients was conducted at two primary care clinics within a single health system in the Midwest. The study examined clinicians' perceptions about ICAN feasibility, patients' and clinicians' perceptions about encounter success, videographic differences in encounter topics, and medication adherence 6 months after an ICAN encounter. Results 39/40 control encounters and 45/60 ICAN encounters yielded usable data. Clinicians reported ICAN use was feasible. In ICAN encounters, patients discussed diet, being active and taking medications more. Clinicians scored themselves poorer regarding visit success than their patients scored them; this effect was more pronounced in ICAN encounters. ICAN did not improve 6-month medication adherence or lengthen visits. Conclusion This pilot study suggests that using ICAN in primary care is feasible, efficient and capable of modifying conversations. With lessons learned in this pilot, we are conducting a randomised trial of ICAN versus usual care in diverse clinical settings. Trial registration number NCT02390570.

KW - chronic disease

KW - healthcare communication

KW - minimally disruptive medicine

KW - multimorbidity

KW - patient-centred care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071754270&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071754270&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029105

DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029105

M3 - Article

C2 - 31481553

AN - SCOPUS:85071754270

VL - 9

JO - BMJ Open

JF - BMJ Open

SN - 2044-6055

IS - 9

M1 - e29105

ER -