Challenges with health-related quality of life assessment in arthroplasty patients: Problems and solutions

Jasvinder Singh, Jeff A Sloan, Norman A. Johanson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

74 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) using patientreported outcomes in arthroplasty has become popular because it provides a unique perspective on successful elective procedures. However, challenges exist in the assessment of HRQOL in clinical practice and in clinical research. Patient compliance with multiple and sometimes lengthy HRQOL assessments administered at multiple follow-up visits is problematic. Many well-validated HRQOL instruments are available, and progress has been made in defining the minimal clinically important difference in hip and knee arthroplasty that denotes the minimal change perceived to be important by patients. Challenges in understanding the literature are attributable to the use of various HRQOL scales, with different scoring ranges and scoring algorithms, different interpretations of highest score, and differences in the presentation of raw versus transformed scores.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)72-82
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
Volume18
Issue number2
StatePublished - Feb 2010

Fingerprint

Arthroplasty
Quality of Life
Knee Replacement Arthroplasties
Patient Compliance
Hip
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Challenges with health-related quality of life assessment in arthroplasty patients : Problems and solutions. / Singh, Jasvinder; Sloan, Jeff A; Johanson, Norman A.

In: Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Vol. 18, No. 2, 02.2010, p. 72-82.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ff33aac95f2f4417a0604b7367c8a112,
title = "Challenges with health-related quality of life assessment in arthroplasty patients: Problems and solutions",
abstract = "Assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) using patientreported outcomes in arthroplasty has become popular because it provides a unique perspective on successful elective procedures. However, challenges exist in the assessment of HRQOL in clinical practice and in clinical research. Patient compliance with multiple and sometimes lengthy HRQOL assessments administered at multiple follow-up visits is problematic. Many well-validated HRQOL instruments are available, and progress has been made in defining the minimal clinically important difference in hip and knee arthroplasty that denotes the minimal change perceived to be important by patients. Challenges in understanding the literature are attributable to the use of various HRQOL scales, with different scoring ranges and scoring algorithms, different interpretations of highest score, and differences in the presentation of raw versus transformed scores.",
author = "Jasvinder Singh and Sloan, {Jeff A} and Johanson, {Norman A.}",
year = "2010",
month = "2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "72--82",
journal = "Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons",
issn = "1067-151X",
publisher = "American Association of Orthopaedic Surgeons",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Challenges with health-related quality of life assessment in arthroplasty patients

T2 - Problems and solutions

AU - Singh, Jasvinder

AU - Sloan, Jeff A

AU - Johanson, Norman A.

PY - 2010/2

Y1 - 2010/2

N2 - Assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) using patientreported outcomes in arthroplasty has become popular because it provides a unique perspective on successful elective procedures. However, challenges exist in the assessment of HRQOL in clinical practice and in clinical research. Patient compliance with multiple and sometimes lengthy HRQOL assessments administered at multiple follow-up visits is problematic. Many well-validated HRQOL instruments are available, and progress has been made in defining the minimal clinically important difference in hip and knee arthroplasty that denotes the minimal change perceived to be important by patients. Challenges in understanding the literature are attributable to the use of various HRQOL scales, with different scoring ranges and scoring algorithms, different interpretations of highest score, and differences in the presentation of raw versus transformed scores.

AB - Assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) using patientreported outcomes in arthroplasty has become popular because it provides a unique perspective on successful elective procedures. However, challenges exist in the assessment of HRQOL in clinical practice and in clinical research. Patient compliance with multiple and sometimes lengthy HRQOL assessments administered at multiple follow-up visits is problematic. Many well-validated HRQOL instruments are available, and progress has been made in defining the minimal clinically important difference in hip and knee arthroplasty that denotes the minimal change perceived to be important by patients. Challenges in understanding the literature are attributable to the use of various HRQOL scales, with different scoring ranges and scoring algorithms, different interpretations of highest score, and differences in the presentation of raw versus transformed scores.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77149176238&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77149176238&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 20118324

AN - SCOPUS:77149176238

VL - 18

SP - 72

EP - 82

JO - Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons

JF - Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons

SN - 1067-151X

IS - 2

ER -