Challenges of manufacturing mesenchymal stromal cell–derived extracellular vesicles in regenerative medicine

Elani F. Wiest, Abba C. Zubair

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

The field of regenerative medicine has expanded greatly in the past decade, with more than 1000 current clinical trials involving mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC) treatment. Multiple recent publications have demonstrated that the beneficial effects from MSCs are not simply due to engraftment into the target organ as classically thought but rather are largely attributable to the release of paracrine factors including cytokines, growth factors and extracellular vesicles (EVs). These EVs contain miRNAs, free fatty acids and proteins that promote regeneration, proliferation and cell function and improve inflammation. Although EVs have shown promising results in animal studies, there are many obstacles to the manufacturing of EVs for clinical applications. This review discusses challenges associated with the manufacturing of clinical-grade EVs in regard to identity, purity, reproducibility, sterility, storage, potency and safety. We discuss currently employed methods and approaches for developing clinical Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP)-grade EVs and the limitations for each. We further discuss the best approaches to overcome the current hurdles in developing clinical GMP-grade EVs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)606-612
Number of pages7
JournalCytotherapy
Volume22
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2020

Keywords

  • Clinical-grade extracellular vesicles
  • Good Manufacturing Practices
  • Mesenchymal stromal cells

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Immunology
  • Oncology
  • Genetics(clinical)
  • Cell Biology
  • Transplantation
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Challenges of manufacturing mesenchymal stromal cell–derived extracellular vesicles in regenerative medicine'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this