TY - JOUR
T1 - Cerebral blood volume and apparent diffusion coefficient – Valuable predictors of non-response to bevacizumab treatment in patients with recurrent glioblastoma
AU - Petrova, Lucie
AU - Korfiatis, Panagiotis
AU - Petr, Ondra
AU - LaChance, Daniel H.
AU - Parney, Ian
AU - Buckner, Jan C.
AU - Erickson, Bradley J.
N1 - Funding Information:
We wish to express our appreciation to the European Regional Development Fund ( CZ.1.05/1.1.00/02.0123 ) for their support.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Authors
PY - 2019/10/15
Y1 - 2019/10/15
N2 - Background: Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common primary brain tumor in adults. The core of standard of care for newly diagnosed GBM was established in 2005 and includes maximum feasible surgical resection followed by radiation and temozolomide, with subsequent temozolomide with or without tumor-treating fields. Unfortunately, nearly all patients experience a recurrence. Bevacizumab (BV) is a commonly used second-line agent for such recurrences, but it has not been shown to impact overall survival, and short-term response is variable. Methods: We collected MRI perfusion and diffusion images from 54 subjects with recurrent GBM treated only with radiation and temozolomide. They were subsequently treated with BV. Using machine learning, we created a model to predict short term response (6 months) and overall survival. We set time thresholds to maximize the separation of responders/survivors versus non-responders/short survivors. Results: We were able to segregate 21 (68%) of 31 subjects into unlikely to respond categories based on Progression Free Survival at 6 months (PFS6) criteria. Twenty-two (69%) of 32 subjects could similarly be identified as unlikely to survive long using the machine learning algorithm. Conclusion: With the use of machine learning techniques to evaluate imaging features derived from pre- and post-treatment multimodal MRI, it is possible to identify an important fraction of patients who are either highly unlikely to respond, or highly likely to respond. This can be helpful is selecting patients that either should or should not be treated with BV.
AB - Background: Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common primary brain tumor in adults. The core of standard of care for newly diagnosed GBM was established in 2005 and includes maximum feasible surgical resection followed by radiation and temozolomide, with subsequent temozolomide with or without tumor-treating fields. Unfortunately, nearly all patients experience a recurrence. Bevacizumab (BV) is a commonly used second-line agent for such recurrences, but it has not been shown to impact overall survival, and short-term response is variable. Methods: We collected MRI perfusion and diffusion images from 54 subjects with recurrent GBM treated only with radiation and temozolomide. They were subsequently treated with BV. Using machine learning, we created a model to predict short term response (6 months) and overall survival. We set time thresholds to maximize the separation of responders/survivors versus non-responders/short survivors. Results: We were able to segregate 21 (68%) of 31 subjects into unlikely to respond categories based on Progression Free Survival at 6 months (PFS6) criteria. Twenty-two (69%) of 32 subjects could similarly be identified as unlikely to survive long using the machine learning algorithm. Conclusion: With the use of machine learning techniques to evaluate imaging features derived from pre- and post-treatment multimodal MRI, it is possible to identify an important fraction of patients who are either highly unlikely to respond, or highly likely to respond. This can be helpful is selecting patients that either should or should not be treated with BV.
KW - Apparent diffusion coefficient
KW - Bevacizumab
KW - Cerebral blood volume
KW - Glioblastoma multiforme
KW - Glioma therapy response
KW - Machine learning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071495341&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071495341&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jns.2019.116433
DO - 10.1016/j.jns.2019.116433
M3 - Article
C2 - 31476621
AN - SCOPUS:85071495341
SN - 0022-510X
VL - 405
JO - Journal of the Neurological Sciences
JF - Journal of the Neurological Sciences
M1 - 116433
ER -