Cerebral aneurysm treatment is beginning to shift to low volume centers

Waleed Brinjikji, Giuseppe Lanzino, David F Kallmes, Harry J. Cloft

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and purpose: A recent expansion of the neurointerventional workforce in the USA could lead to a trend toward cerebral aneurysms being increasingly treated at low volume centers. Such a trend could have a negative impact on patient care as higher volume centers are known to have better outcomes. Methods: Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, we evaluated trends in aneurysm treatment in the USA from 2001 to 2010. Annual volumes of both ruptured and unruptured aneurysms were counted, as well as annual percentages of cases treated at high volume centers (≥50 aneurysms/year clipped or coiled). Results: The number of ruptured aneurysms treated per year has fluctuated between 9000 and 12 000 from 2003 to 2010. In 2001-2002, 27.4% of intracranial aneurysm patients were treated with clipping or coiling at high volume centers, with a peak of 70.1% in 2007-2008. This proportion dropped to 61.8% in 2009-2010. The proportion of patients clipped at high volume centers was 23.3% in 2001-2002 and peaked at 65.0% in 2007-2008. In 2009-2010, the proportion dropped to 58.6%. For coiling patients, 46.4% were treated at high volume centers in 2001-2002, with a peak of 70.1% in 2007-2008, and a drop to 61.8% in 2009-2010. Conclusion: A trend toward less cerebral aneurysms being treated in high volume centers in 2009 and 2010 is worrisome because high volume centers are known to tend to have better outcomes. This trend is likely due to recent expansion of the neurointerventional workforce.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)349-352
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of NeuroInterventional Surgery
Volume6
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Intracranial Aneurysm
Ruptured Aneurysm
Aneurysm
Inpatients
Patient Care
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Cerebral aneurysm treatment is beginning to shift to low volume centers. / Brinjikji, Waleed; Lanzino, Giuseppe; Kallmes, David F; Cloft, Harry J.

In: Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, Vol. 6, No. 5, 2014, p. 349-352.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{80d5ef6b49034c229f0a26db7e7bfd8c,
title = "Cerebral aneurysm treatment is beginning to shift to low volume centers",
abstract = "Background and purpose: A recent expansion of the neurointerventional workforce in the USA could lead to a trend toward cerebral aneurysms being increasingly treated at low volume centers. Such a trend could have a negative impact on patient care as higher volume centers are known to have better outcomes. Methods: Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, we evaluated trends in aneurysm treatment in the USA from 2001 to 2010. Annual volumes of both ruptured and unruptured aneurysms were counted, as well as annual percentages of cases treated at high volume centers (≥50 aneurysms/year clipped or coiled). Results: The number of ruptured aneurysms treated per year has fluctuated between 9000 and 12 000 from 2003 to 2010. In 2001-2002, 27.4{\%} of intracranial aneurysm patients were treated with clipping or coiling at high volume centers, with a peak of 70.1{\%} in 2007-2008. This proportion dropped to 61.8{\%} in 2009-2010. The proportion of patients clipped at high volume centers was 23.3{\%} in 2001-2002 and peaked at 65.0{\%} in 2007-2008. In 2009-2010, the proportion dropped to 58.6{\%}. For coiling patients, 46.4{\%} were treated at high volume centers in 2001-2002, with a peak of 70.1{\%} in 2007-2008, and a drop to 61.8{\%} in 2009-2010. Conclusion: A trend toward less cerebral aneurysms being treated in high volume centers in 2009 and 2010 is worrisome because high volume centers are known to tend to have better outcomes. This trend is likely due to recent expansion of the neurointerventional workforce.",
author = "Waleed Brinjikji and Giuseppe Lanzino and Kallmes, {David F} and Cloft, {Harry J.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010811",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "349--352",
journal = "Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery",
issn = "1759-8478",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cerebral aneurysm treatment is beginning to shift to low volume centers

AU - Brinjikji, Waleed

AU - Lanzino, Giuseppe

AU - Kallmes, David F

AU - Cloft, Harry J.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Background and purpose: A recent expansion of the neurointerventional workforce in the USA could lead to a trend toward cerebral aneurysms being increasingly treated at low volume centers. Such a trend could have a negative impact on patient care as higher volume centers are known to have better outcomes. Methods: Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, we evaluated trends in aneurysm treatment in the USA from 2001 to 2010. Annual volumes of both ruptured and unruptured aneurysms were counted, as well as annual percentages of cases treated at high volume centers (≥50 aneurysms/year clipped or coiled). Results: The number of ruptured aneurysms treated per year has fluctuated between 9000 and 12 000 from 2003 to 2010. In 2001-2002, 27.4% of intracranial aneurysm patients were treated with clipping or coiling at high volume centers, with a peak of 70.1% in 2007-2008. This proportion dropped to 61.8% in 2009-2010. The proportion of patients clipped at high volume centers was 23.3% in 2001-2002 and peaked at 65.0% in 2007-2008. In 2009-2010, the proportion dropped to 58.6%. For coiling patients, 46.4% were treated at high volume centers in 2001-2002, with a peak of 70.1% in 2007-2008, and a drop to 61.8% in 2009-2010. Conclusion: A trend toward less cerebral aneurysms being treated in high volume centers in 2009 and 2010 is worrisome because high volume centers are known to tend to have better outcomes. This trend is likely due to recent expansion of the neurointerventional workforce.

AB - Background and purpose: A recent expansion of the neurointerventional workforce in the USA could lead to a trend toward cerebral aneurysms being increasingly treated at low volume centers. Such a trend could have a negative impact on patient care as higher volume centers are known to have better outcomes. Methods: Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, we evaluated trends in aneurysm treatment in the USA from 2001 to 2010. Annual volumes of both ruptured and unruptured aneurysms were counted, as well as annual percentages of cases treated at high volume centers (≥50 aneurysms/year clipped or coiled). Results: The number of ruptured aneurysms treated per year has fluctuated between 9000 and 12 000 from 2003 to 2010. In 2001-2002, 27.4% of intracranial aneurysm patients were treated with clipping or coiling at high volume centers, with a peak of 70.1% in 2007-2008. This proportion dropped to 61.8% in 2009-2010. The proportion of patients clipped at high volume centers was 23.3% in 2001-2002 and peaked at 65.0% in 2007-2008. In 2009-2010, the proportion dropped to 58.6%. For coiling patients, 46.4% were treated at high volume centers in 2001-2002, with a peak of 70.1% in 2007-2008, and a drop to 61.8% in 2009-2010. Conclusion: A trend toward less cerebral aneurysms being treated in high volume centers in 2009 and 2010 is worrisome because high volume centers are known to tend to have better outcomes. This trend is likely due to recent expansion of the neurointerventional workforce.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84901939653&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84901939653&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010811

DO - 10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010811

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 349

EP - 352

JO - Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery

JF - Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery

SN - 1759-8478

IS - 5

ER -