Case studies in transplant ethics

Matthew D. Griffin, Mikel Prieto

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Clinicians and other health care professionals involved in the evaluation and management of organ transplant recipients and organ donors quite commonly encounter ethically complex scenarios during the course of their work. The response to such challenging situations may be influenced by personal experiences and beliefs, programmatic or institutional policy, existing legislation, published literature, and consultative analysis by experts in the field of biomedical ethics. As organ transplantation continues to evolve in its scope, complexity, and global reach, there is a growing need for transplant programs to carefully discuss and reach consensus on how to deal with specific ethical issues that may arise. In this article, we present the summaries of 3 clinically relevant case scenarios from the 2007 Mayo Clinic Course in Transplant Ethics, along with the results of audience responses and discussion facilitated by a volunteer panel of experts from North America.11Expert panel: (1) Michael P. Bannon, MD, Consultant, Trauma, Critical Care and General Surgery, Mayo Clinic; Chairman of the Transplant Center Ethics Advisory Board. (2) Sheila Jowsey, MD, Consultant, Department of Psychiatry and Transplant Center, Mayo Clinic. (3) Charles Miller, MD, Director, Liver Transplant Program, The Cleveland Clinic. (4) Kathy Schwab, RN, Supervisor, Transplant Coordinators, Transplant Center, Mayo Clinic. (5) Robyn Shapiro, JD, Director, Center for the Study of Bioethics, Medical College of Wisconsin. (6) Maryam Valapour, MD, Consultant, Center for Bioethics, Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School. (7) Linda Wright, MHSC, MSW, RSW, Consultant Bioethicist, Toronto General Hospital/University of Toronto. The cases provide cogent examples of how open, consensus-driven discussion of specific ethically charged scenarios can be useful in guiding progressive clinical practices in organ transplantation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)178-183
Number of pages6
JournalTransplantation Reviews
Volume22
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2008

Fingerprint

Ethics
Transplants
Consultants
Ethicists
Bioethics
Organ Transplantation
Critical Care
Consensus
Organizational Policy
Pulmonary Medicine
Medical Schools
Legislation
General Hospitals
Psychiatry
Volunteers
Medicine
Tissue Donors
Delivery of Health Care
Liver
Wounds and Injuries

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Transplantation

Cite this

Case studies in transplant ethics. / Griffin, Matthew D.; Prieto, Mikel.

In: Transplantation Reviews, Vol. 22, No. 3, 07.2008, p. 178-183.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Griffin, Matthew D. ; Prieto, Mikel. / Case studies in transplant ethics. In: Transplantation Reviews. 2008 ; Vol. 22, No. 3. pp. 178-183.
@article{ca9c8cc66bcc4bf587f6debd919fc7ac,
title = "Case studies in transplant ethics",
abstract = "Clinicians and other health care professionals involved in the evaluation and management of organ transplant recipients and organ donors quite commonly encounter ethically complex scenarios during the course of their work. The response to such challenging situations may be influenced by personal experiences and beliefs, programmatic or institutional policy, existing legislation, published literature, and consultative analysis by experts in the field of biomedical ethics. As organ transplantation continues to evolve in its scope, complexity, and global reach, there is a growing need for transplant programs to carefully discuss and reach consensus on how to deal with specific ethical issues that may arise. In this article, we present the summaries of 3 clinically relevant case scenarios from the 2007 Mayo Clinic Course in Transplant Ethics, along with the results of audience responses and discussion facilitated by a volunteer panel of experts from North America.11Expert panel: (1) Michael P. Bannon, MD, Consultant, Trauma, Critical Care and General Surgery, Mayo Clinic; Chairman of the Transplant Center Ethics Advisory Board. (2) Sheila Jowsey, MD, Consultant, Department of Psychiatry and Transplant Center, Mayo Clinic. (3) Charles Miller, MD, Director, Liver Transplant Program, The Cleveland Clinic. (4) Kathy Schwab, RN, Supervisor, Transplant Coordinators, Transplant Center, Mayo Clinic. (5) Robyn Shapiro, JD, Director, Center for the Study of Bioethics, Medical College of Wisconsin. (6) Maryam Valapour, MD, Consultant, Center for Bioethics, Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School. (7) Linda Wright, MHSC, MSW, RSW, Consultant Bioethicist, Toronto General Hospital/University of Toronto. The cases provide cogent examples of how open, consensus-driven discussion of specific ethically charged scenarios can be useful in guiding progressive clinical practices in organ transplantation.",
author = "Griffin, {Matthew D.} and Mikel Prieto",
year = "2008",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.trre.2008.02.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "178--183",
journal = "Transplantation Reviews",
issn = "0955-470X",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Case studies in transplant ethics

AU - Griffin, Matthew D.

AU - Prieto, Mikel

PY - 2008/7

Y1 - 2008/7

N2 - Clinicians and other health care professionals involved in the evaluation and management of organ transplant recipients and organ donors quite commonly encounter ethically complex scenarios during the course of their work. The response to such challenging situations may be influenced by personal experiences and beliefs, programmatic or institutional policy, existing legislation, published literature, and consultative analysis by experts in the field of biomedical ethics. As organ transplantation continues to evolve in its scope, complexity, and global reach, there is a growing need for transplant programs to carefully discuss and reach consensus on how to deal with specific ethical issues that may arise. In this article, we present the summaries of 3 clinically relevant case scenarios from the 2007 Mayo Clinic Course in Transplant Ethics, along with the results of audience responses and discussion facilitated by a volunteer panel of experts from North America.11Expert panel: (1) Michael P. Bannon, MD, Consultant, Trauma, Critical Care and General Surgery, Mayo Clinic; Chairman of the Transplant Center Ethics Advisory Board. (2) Sheila Jowsey, MD, Consultant, Department of Psychiatry and Transplant Center, Mayo Clinic. (3) Charles Miller, MD, Director, Liver Transplant Program, The Cleveland Clinic. (4) Kathy Schwab, RN, Supervisor, Transplant Coordinators, Transplant Center, Mayo Clinic. (5) Robyn Shapiro, JD, Director, Center for the Study of Bioethics, Medical College of Wisconsin. (6) Maryam Valapour, MD, Consultant, Center for Bioethics, Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School. (7) Linda Wright, MHSC, MSW, RSW, Consultant Bioethicist, Toronto General Hospital/University of Toronto. The cases provide cogent examples of how open, consensus-driven discussion of specific ethically charged scenarios can be useful in guiding progressive clinical practices in organ transplantation.

AB - Clinicians and other health care professionals involved in the evaluation and management of organ transplant recipients and organ donors quite commonly encounter ethically complex scenarios during the course of their work. The response to such challenging situations may be influenced by personal experiences and beliefs, programmatic or institutional policy, existing legislation, published literature, and consultative analysis by experts in the field of biomedical ethics. As organ transplantation continues to evolve in its scope, complexity, and global reach, there is a growing need for transplant programs to carefully discuss and reach consensus on how to deal with specific ethical issues that may arise. In this article, we present the summaries of 3 clinically relevant case scenarios from the 2007 Mayo Clinic Course in Transplant Ethics, along with the results of audience responses and discussion facilitated by a volunteer panel of experts from North America.11Expert panel: (1) Michael P. Bannon, MD, Consultant, Trauma, Critical Care and General Surgery, Mayo Clinic; Chairman of the Transplant Center Ethics Advisory Board. (2) Sheila Jowsey, MD, Consultant, Department of Psychiatry and Transplant Center, Mayo Clinic. (3) Charles Miller, MD, Director, Liver Transplant Program, The Cleveland Clinic. (4) Kathy Schwab, RN, Supervisor, Transplant Coordinators, Transplant Center, Mayo Clinic. (5) Robyn Shapiro, JD, Director, Center for the Study of Bioethics, Medical College of Wisconsin. (6) Maryam Valapour, MD, Consultant, Center for Bioethics, Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School. (7) Linda Wright, MHSC, MSW, RSW, Consultant Bioethicist, Toronto General Hospital/University of Toronto. The cases provide cogent examples of how open, consensus-driven discussion of specific ethically charged scenarios can be useful in guiding progressive clinical practices in organ transplantation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=45049084095&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=45049084095&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.trre.2008.02.002

DO - 10.1016/j.trre.2008.02.002

M3 - Article

C2 - 18631874

AN - SCOPUS:45049084095

VL - 22

SP - 178

EP - 183

JO - Transplantation Reviews

JF - Transplantation Reviews

SN - 0955-470X

IS - 3

ER -