Case-control study to estimate the performance of dual-energy computed tomography for anterior cruciate ligament tears in patients with history of knee trauma

Katrina Nesta Glazebrook, Lee J. Brewerton, Shuai Leng, Rickey E. Carter, Peter C. Rhee, Naveen S Murthy, B. Mathew Howe, Michael D. Ringler, Diane L. Dahm, Michael J. Stuart, Cynthia H McCollough, Joel Garland Fletcher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Computed tomography (CT) is used to assess for fracture after knee trauma, but identification of ligamentous injuries may also be beneficial. Our purpose is to assess the potential of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) for the detection of complete anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) disruption. Methods: Sixteen patients with unilateral traumatic ACL disruption (average of 58 days following trauma) confirmed by MRI, and 11 control patients without trauma, underwent DECT of both knees. For each knee, axial, sagittal, and oblique sagittal images (with DECT bone removal, single-energy (SE) bone removal, and DECT tendon-specific color mapping) were reconstructed. Four musculoskeletal radiologists randomly evaluated the 324 DECT reconstructed series (54 knees with 6 displays) separately, to assess for ACL disruption using a five-point scale (1 = definitely not torn, to 5 = definitely torn). ROC analysis was used to compare performance across readers and displays. Results: Sagittal oblique displays (mixed kV soft tissue, SE bone removal, and DECT bone removal) demonstrated higher areas under the curve for ACL disruption (AUC = 0.95, 0.93 and 0.95 respectively) without significant differences in performance between readers (p > 0.23). Inter-reader agreement was also better for these display methods (ICC range 0.62-0.69) compared with other techniques (ICC range 0.41-0.57). Mean sensitivity for ACL disruption was worst for DECT tendon-specific color map and axial images (24 % and 63 % respectively). Conclusion: DECT knee images with oblique sagittal reconstructions using either mixed kV or bone removal displays (either DECT or SE) depict ACL disruption in the subacute or chronic setting with reliable identification by musculoskeletal radiologists.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)297-305
Number of pages9
JournalSkeletal Radiology
Volume43
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2014

Fingerprint

Case-Control Studies
Knee
Tomography
Anterior Cruciate Ligament
Wounds and Injuries
Bone and Bones
Tendons
Area Under Curve
Color
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
ROC Curve

Keywords

  • ACL
  • CT
  • Dual energy
  • Knee
  • Ligament tear

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Case-control study to estimate the performance of dual-energy computed tomography for anterior cruciate ligament tears in patients with history of knee trauma. / Glazebrook, Katrina Nesta; Brewerton, Lee J.; Leng, Shuai; Carter, Rickey E.; Rhee, Peter C.; Murthy, Naveen S; Howe, B. Mathew; Ringler, Michael D.; Dahm, Diane L.; Stuart, Michael J.; McCollough, Cynthia H; Fletcher, Joel Garland.

In: Skeletal Radiology, Vol. 43, No. 3, 03.2014, p. 297-305.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5eb44e798c9c4bfd8be7d73d06bc86d0,
title = "Case-control study to estimate the performance of dual-energy computed tomography for anterior cruciate ligament tears in patients with history of knee trauma",
abstract = "Objective: Computed tomography (CT) is used to assess for fracture after knee trauma, but identification of ligamentous injuries may also be beneficial. Our purpose is to assess the potential of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) for the detection of complete anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) disruption. Methods: Sixteen patients with unilateral traumatic ACL disruption (average of 58 days following trauma) confirmed by MRI, and 11 control patients without trauma, underwent DECT of both knees. For each knee, axial, sagittal, and oblique sagittal images (with DECT bone removal, single-energy (SE) bone removal, and DECT tendon-specific color mapping) were reconstructed. Four musculoskeletal radiologists randomly evaluated the 324 DECT reconstructed series (54 knees with 6 displays) separately, to assess for ACL disruption using a five-point scale (1 = definitely not torn, to 5 = definitely torn). ROC analysis was used to compare performance across readers and displays. Results: Sagittal oblique displays (mixed kV soft tissue, SE bone removal, and DECT bone removal) demonstrated higher areas under the curve for ACL disruption (AUC = 0.95, 0.93 and 0.95 respectively) without significant differences in performance between readers (p > 0.23). Inter-reader agreement was also better for these display methods (ICC range 0.62-0.69) compared with other techniques (ICC range 0.41-0.57). Mean sensitivity for ACL disruption was worst for DECT tendon-specific color map and axial images (24 {\%} and 63 {\%} respectively). Conclusion: DECT knee images with oblique sagittal reconstructions using either mixed kV or bone removal displays (either DECT or SE) depict ACL disruption in the subacute or chronic setting with reliable identification by musculoskeletal radiologists.",
keywords = "ACL, CT, Dual energy, Knee, Ligament tear",
author = "Glazebrook, {Katrina Nesta} and Brewerton, {Lee J.} and Shuai Leng and Carter, {Rickey E.} and Rhee, {Peter C.} and Murthy, {Naveen S} and Howe, {B. Mathew} and Ringler, {Michael D.} and Dahm, {Diane L.} and Stuart, {Michael J.} and McCollough, {Cynthia H} and Fletcher, {Joel Garland}",
year = "2014",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1007/s00256-013-1784-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "297--305",
journal = "Skeletal Radiology",
issn = "0364-2348",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Case-control study to estimate the performance of dual-energy computed tomography for anterior cruciate ligament tears in patients with history of knee trauma

AU - Glazebrook, Katrina Nesta

AU - Brewerton, Lee J.

AU - Leng, Shuai

AU - Carter, Rickey E.

AU - Rhee, Peter C.

AU - Murthy, Naveen S

AU - Howe, B. Mathew

AU - Ringler, Michael D.

AU - Dahm, Diane L.

AU - Stuart, Michael J.

AU - McCollough, Cynthia H

AU - Fletcher, Joel Garland

PY - 2014/3

Y1 - 2014/3

N2 - Objective: Computed tomography (CT) is used to assess for fracture after knee trauma, but identification of ligamentous injuries may also be beneficial. Our purpose is to assess the potential of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) for the detection of complete anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) disruption. Methods: Sixteen patients with unilateral traumatic ACL disruption (average of 58 days following trauma) confirmed by MRI, and 11 control patients without trauma, underwent DECT of both knees. For each knee, axial, sagittal, and oblique sagittal images (with DECT bone removal, single-energy (SE) bone removal, and DECT tendon-specific color mapping) were reconstructed. Four musculoskeletal radiologists randomly evaluated the 324 DECT reconstructed series (54 knees with 6 displays) separately, to assess for ACL disruption using a five-point scale (1 = definitely not torn, to 5 = definitely torn). ROC analysis was used to compare performance across readers and displays. Results: Sagittal oblique displays (mixed kV soft tissue, SE bone removal, and DECT bone removal) demonstrated higher areas under the curve for ACL disruption (AUC = 0.95, 0.93 and 0.95 respectively) without significant differences in performance between readers (p > 0.23). Inter-reader agreement was also better for these display methods (ICC range 0.62-0.69) compared with other techniques (ICC range 0.41-0.57). Mean sensitivity for ACL disruption was worst for DECT tendon-specific color map and axial images (24 % and 63 % respectively). Conclusion: DECT knee images with oblique sagittal reconstructions using either mixed kV or bone removal displays (either DECT or SE) depict ACL disruption in the subacute or chronic setting with reliable identification by musculoskeletal radiologists.

AB - Objective: Computed tomography (CT) is used to assess for fracture after knee trauma, but identification of ligamentous injuries may also be beneficial. Our purpose is to assess the potential of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) for the detection of complete anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) disruption. Methods: Sixteen patients with unilateral traumatic ACL disruption (average of 58 days following trauma) confirmed by MRI, and 11 control patients without trauma, underwent DECT of both knees. For each knee, axial, sagittal, and oblique sagittal images (with DECT bone removal, single-energy (SE) bone removal, and DECT tendon-specific color mapping) were reconstructed. Four musculoskeletal radiologists randomly evaluated the 324 DECT reconstructed series (54 knees with 6 displays) separately, to assess for ACL disruption using a five-point scale (1 = definitely not torn, to 5 = definitely torn). ROC analysis was used to compare performance across readers and displays. Results: Sagittal oblique displays (mixed kV soft tissue, SE bone removal, and DECT bone removal) demonstrated higher areas under the curve for ACL disruption (AUC = 0.95, 0.93 and 0.95 respectively) without significant differences in performance between readers (p > 0.23). Inter-reader agreement was also better for these display methods (ICC range 0.62-0.69) compared with other techniques (ICC range 0.41-0.57). Mean sensitivity for ACL disruption was worst for DECT tendon-specific color map and axial images (24 % and 63 % respectively). Conclusion: DECT knee images with oblique sagittal reconstructions using either mixed kV or bone removal displays (either DECT or SE) depict ACL disruption in the subacute or chronic setting with reliable identification by musculoskeletal radiologists.

KW - ACL

KW - CT

KW - Dual energy

KW - Knee

KW - Ligament tear

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893755552&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84893755552&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00256-013-1784-3

DO - 10.1007/s00256-013-1784-3

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 297

EP - 305

JO - Skeletal Radiology

JF - Skeletal Radiology

SN - 0364-2348

IS - 3

ER -