Case-Based Discussion Regarding Challenges in Patient Selection and Procedural Planning in Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion

Sidakpal S. Panaich, Thomas Munger, Paul Friedman, Charanjit S. Rihal, David R. Holmes

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) accounts for most embolic strokes, especially in elderly individuals. Although anticoagulation is known to reduce the risk of embolic stroke, a significant proportion of patients have relative or absolute contraindications to anticoagulation. The left atrial appendage has been implicated as the major source of emboli in more than 90% of ischemic strokes in nonvalvular AF. Left atrial appendage occlusion offers an alternative for stroke prevention in patients with an elevated stroke risk (CHADS 2 score ≥2 or CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score ≥3) who have a rationale for avoiding long-term oral anticoagulation after a shared decision-making process. However, there remain significant challenges in left atrial appendage occlusion therapy related to patient selection, the procedure itself, and postprocedural patient management decisions. In this review article, we discuss some of these challenges in a case discussion–based approach.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)630-638
Number of pages9
JournalMayo Clinic proceedings
Volume93
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2018

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Case-Based Discussion Regarding Challenges in Patient Selection and Procedural Planning in Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this