Cardiovascular risk assessment - From individual risk prediction to estimation of global risk and change in risk in the population

John A. Batsis, Francisco Lopez-Jimenez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

41 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Cardiovascular disease is the most common cause of death and risk prediction formulae such as the Framingham Risk Score have been developed to easily identify patients at high risk that may require therapeutic interventions.Discussion: Using cardiovascular risk formulae at a population level to estimate and compare average cardiovascular risk among groups has been recently proposed as a way to facilitate surveillance of net cardiovascular risk and target public health interventions. Risk prediction formulas may help to compare interventions that cause effects of different magnitudes and directions in several cardiovascular risk factors, because these formulas assess the net change in risk using easily obtainable clinical variables. Because of conflicting data estimates of the incidence and prevalence of cardiovascular disease, risk prediction formulae may be a useful tool to estimate such risk at a population level.Summary: Although risk prediction formulae were intended on guiding clinicians to individualized therapy, they also can be used to ascertain trends at a population-level, particularly in situations where changes in different cardiovascular risk factors over time have different magnitudes and directions. The efficacy of interventions that are proposed to reduce cardiovascular risk impacting more than one risk factor can be well assessed by these means.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number29
JournalBMC Medicine
Volume8
DOIs
StatePublished - May 25 2010

Fingerprint

Population
Cardiovascular Diseases
Cause of Death
Public Health
Incidence
Therapeutics
Direction compound

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

@article{c8bad200ac844cb2b38c02615cf3c6b9,
title = "Cardiovascular risk assessment - From individual risk prediction to estimation of global risk and change in risk in the population",
abstract = "Background: Cardiovascular disease is the most common cause of death and risk prediction formulae such as the Framingham Risk Score have been developed to easily identify patients at high risk that may require therapeutic interventions.Discussion: Using cardiovascular risk formulae at a population level to estimate and compare average cardiovascular risk among groups has been recently proposed as a way to facilitate surveillance of net cardiovascular risk and target public health interventions. Risk prediction formulas may help to compare interventions that cause effects of different magnitudes and directions in several cardiovascular risk factors, because these formulas assess the net change in risk using easily obtainable clinical variables. Because of conflicting data estimates of the incidence and prevalence of cardiovascular disease, risk prediction formulae may be a useful tool to estimate such risk at a population level.Summary: Although risk prediction formulae were intended on guiding clinicians to individualized therapy, they also can be used to ascertain trends at a population-level, particularly in situations where changes in different cardiovascular risk factors over time have different magnitudes and directions. The efficacy of interventions that are proposed to reduce cardiovascular risk impacting more than one risk factor can be well assessed by these means.",
author = "Batsis, {John A.} and Francisco Lopez-Jimenez",
year = "2010",
month = "5",
day = "25",
doi = "10.1186/1741-7015-8-29",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
journal = "BMC Medicine",
issn = "1741-7015",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cardiovascular risk assessment - From individual risk prediction to estimation of global risk and change in risk in the population

AU - Batsis, John A.

AU - Lopez-Jimenez, Francisco

PY - 2010/5/25

Y1 - 2010/5/25

N2 - Background: Cardiovascular disease is the most common cause of death and risk prediction formulae such as the Framingham Risk Score have been developed to easily identify patients at high risk that may require therapeutic interventions.Discussion: Using cardiovascular risk formulae at a population level to estimate and compare average cardiovascular risk among groups has been recently proposed as a way to facilitate surveillance of net cardiovascular risk and target public health interventions. Risk prediction formulas may help to compare interventions that cause effects of different magnitudes and directions in several cardiovascular risk factors, because these formulas assess the net change in risk using easily obtainable clinical variables. Because of conflicting data estimates of the incidence and prevalence of cardiovascular disease, risk prediction formulae may be a useful tool to estimate such risk at a population level.Summary: Although risk prediction formulae were intended on guiding clinicians to individualized therapy, they also can be used to ascertain trends at a population-level, particularly in situations where changes in different cardiovascular risk factors over time have different magnitudes and directions. The efficacy of interventions that are proposed to reduce cardiovascular risk impacting more than one risk factor can be well assessed by these means.

AB - Background: Cardiovascular disease is the most common cause of death and risk prediction formulae such as the Framingham Risk Score have been developed to easily identify patients at high risk that may require therapeutic interventions.Discussion: Using cardiovascular risk formulae at a population level to estimate and compare average cardiovascular risk among groups has been recently proposed as a way to facilitate surveillance of net cardiovascular risk and target public health interventions. Risk prediction formulas may help to compare interventions that cause effects of different magnitudes and directions in several cardiovascular risk factors, because these formulas assess the net change in risk using easily obtainable clinical variables. Because of conflicting data estimates of the incidence and prevalence of cardiovascular disease, risk prediction formulae may be a useful tool to estimate such risk at a population level.Summary: Although risk prediction formulae were intended on guiding clinicians to individualized therapy, they also can be used to ascertain trends at a population-level, particularly in situations where changes in different cardiovascular risk factors over time have different magnitudes and directions. The efficacy of interventions that are proposed to reduce cardiovascular risk impacting more than one risk factor can be well assessed by these means.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77952499794&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77952499794&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1741-7015-8-29

DO - 10.1186/1741-7015-8-29

M3 - Article

C2 - 20500815

AN - SCOPUS:77952499794

VL - 8

JO - BMC Medicine

JF - BMC Medicine

SN - 1741-7015

M1 - 29

ER -