Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Parallel Imaging at 3.0 Tesla: Technical Feasibility and Advantages

Kiaran Patrick McGee, Josef P. Debbins, Ed B. Boskamp, LeRoy Blawat, Lisa Angelos, Kevin F. King

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To quantify changes in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), specific absorption rate (SAR), RF power deposition, and imaging time in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging with and without the application of parallel imaging at 1.5 T and 3.0 T. Materials and Methods: Phantom and volunteer data were acquired at 1.5 T and 3.0 T with and without parallel imaging. Results: Doubling field strength increased phantom SNR by a factor of 1.83. In volunteer data, SNR and CNR values increased by factors of 1.86 and 1.35, respectively. Parallel imaging (reduction factor = 2) decreased phantom SNR by a factor of 1.84 and 2.07 when compared to the full acquisition at 1.5 T and 3.0 T, respectively. In volunteers, SNR and CNR decreased by factors of 2.65 and 2.05 at 1.5 T and 1.99 and 1.75 at 3.0 T, respectively. Doubling the field strength produces a nine-fold increase in SAR (0.0751 to 0.674 W/kg). Parallel imaging reduced the total RF power deposition by a factor of two at both field strengths. Conclusions: Parallel imaging decreases total scan time at the expense of SNR and CNR. These losses are compensated at higher field strengths. Parallel imaging is effective at reducing total power deposition by reducing total scan time.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)291-297
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Volume19
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2004

Fingerprint

Signal-To-Noise Ratio
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Noise
Volunteers

Keywords

  • Heart
  • High field imaging
  • Magnetic resonance
  • Parallel imaging
  • RF power

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Parallel Imaging at 3.0 Tesla : Technical Feasibility and Advantages. / McGee, Kiaran Patrick; Debbins, Josef P.; Boskamp, Ed B.; Blawat, LeRoy; Angelos, Lisa; King, Kevin F.

In: Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Vol. 19, No. 3, 03.2004, p. 291-297.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

McGee, Kiaran Patrick ; Debbins, Josef P. ; Boskamp, Ed B. ; Blawat, LeRoy ; Angelos, Lisa ; King, Kevin F. / Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Parallel Imaging at 3.0 Tesla : Technical Feasibility and Advantages. In: Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2004 ; Vol. 19, No. 3. pp. 291-297.
@article{b2b4c0b169724aae92d9c5851827c5bc,
title = "Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Parallel Imaging at 3.0 Tesla: Technical Feasibility and Advantages",
abstract = "Purpose: To quantify changes in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), specific absorption rate (SAR), RF power deposition, and imaging time in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging with and without the application of parallel imaging at 1.5 T and 3.0 T. Materials and Methods: Phantom and volunteer data were acquired at 1.5 T and 3.0 T with and without parallel imaging. Results: Doubling field strength increased phantom SNR by a factor of 1.83. In volunteer data, SNR and CNR values increased by factors of 1.86 and 1.35, respectively. Parallel imaging (reduction factor = 2) decreased phantom SNR by a factor of 1.84 and 2.07 when compared to the full acquisition at 1.5 T and 3.0 T, respectively. In volunteers, SNR and CNR decreased by factors of 2.65 and 2.05 at 1.5 T and 1.99 and 1.75 at 3.0 T, respectively. Doubling the field strength produces a nine-fold increase in SAR (0.0751 to 0.674 W/kg). Parallel imaging reduced the total RF power deposition by a factor of two at both field strengths. Conclusions: Parallel imaging decreases total scan time at the expense of SNR and CNR. These losses are compensated at higher field strengths. Parallel imaging is effective at reducing total power deposition by reducing total scan time.",
keywords = "Heart, High field imaging, Magnetic resonance, Parallel imaging, RF power",
author = "McGee, {Kiaran Patrick} and Debbins, {Josef P.} and Boskamp, {Ed B.} and LeRoy Blawat and Lisa Angelos and King, {Kevin F.}",
year = "2004",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1002/jmri.20015",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "291--297",
journal = "Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging",
issn = "1053-1807",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Parallel Imaging at 3.0 Tesla

T2 - Technical Feasibility and Advantages

AU - McGee, Kiaran Patrick

AU - Debbins, Josef P.

AU - Boskamp, Ed B.

AU - Blawat, LeRoy

AU - Angelos, Lisa

AU - King, Kevin F.

PY - 2004/3

Y1 - 2004/3

N2 - Purpose: To quantify changes in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), specific absorption rate (SAR), RF power deposition, and imaging time in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging with and without the application of parallel imaging at 1.5 T and 3.0 T. Materials and Methods: Phantom and volunteer data were acquired at 1.5 T and 3.0 T with and without parallel imaging. Results: Doubling field strength increased phantom SNR by a factor of 1.83. In volunteer data, SNR and CNR values increased by factors of 1.86 and 1.35, respectively. Parallel imaging (reduction factor = 2) decreased phantom SNR by a factor of 1.84 and 2.07 when compared to the full acquisition at 1.5 T and 3.0 T, respectively. In volunteers, SNR and CNR decreased by factors of 2.65 and 2.05 at 1.5 T and 1.99 and 1.75 at 3.0 T, respectively. Doubling the field strength produces a nine-fold increase in SAR (0.0751 to 0.674 W/kg). Parallel imaging reduced the total RF power deposition by a factor of two at both field strengths. Conclusions: Parallel imaging decreases total scan time at the expense of SNR and CNR. These losses are compensated at higher field strengths. Parallel imaging is effective at reducing total power deposition by reducing total scan time.

AB - Purpose: To quantify changes in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), specific absorption rate (SAR), RF power deposition, and imaging time in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging with and without the application of parallel imaging at 1.5 T and 3.0 T. Materials and Methods: Phantom and volunteer data were acquired at 1.5 T and 3.0 T with and without parallel imaging. Results: Doubling field strength increased phantom SNR by a factor of 1.83. In volunteer data, SNR and CNR values increased by factors of 1.86 and 1.35, respectively. Parallel imaging (reduction factor = 2) decreased phantom SNR by a factor of 1.84 and 2.07 when compared to the full acquisition at 1.5 T and 3.0 T, respectively. In volunteers, SNR and CNR decreased by factors of 2.65 and 2.05 at 1.5 T and 1.99 and 1.75 at 3.0 T, respectively. Doubling the field strength produces a nine-fold increase in SAR (0.0751 to 0.674 W/kg). Parallel imaging reduced the total RF power deposition by a factor of two at both field strengths. Conclusions: Parallel imaging decreases total scan time at the expense of SNR and CNR. These losses are compensated at higher field strengths. Parallel imaging is effective at reducing total power deposition by reducing total scan time.

KW - Heart

KW - High field imaging

KW - Magnetic resonance

KW - Parallel imaging

KW - RF power

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1542288963&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1542288963&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jmri.20015

DO - 10.1002/jmri.20015

M3 - Article

C2 - 14994296

AN - SCOPUS:1542288963

VL - 19

SP - 291

EP - 297

JO - Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

JF - Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

SN - 1053-1807

IS - 3

ER -