Can the Gail Model be Useful in American Indian and Alaska Native Populations?

Judith S Kaur, Marilyn A. Roubidoux, Jeff A Sloan, Paul Novotny

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND. Very little is known about breast carcinoma risk factors for American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) women undergoing screening. The Gail model has been a useful tool for predicting the risk of breast carcinoma in several populations. It has not been applied systematically to AI/AN women. METHODS. The current study was a retrospective review of 1458 screening mammograms performed for AI/AN women. The authors applied the Gail model to estimate both absolute risk and relative risk for breast carcinoma for AI/AN women screened in South Dakota, Arizona, and Alaska. RESULTS. The mean age of the women was 52.4 years. The onset of menses was not significantly different than expected. The average age at first birth was 20 years, very few women were nulliparous, and few women were age > 30 years at first live birth. The proportion of women reporting a first- or second-degree relative with breast carcinoma was similar to the proportion in the general population. The results of the model indicated an overall average relative risk that ranged from 1.42 to 2.69 compared with white American women, depending on the model assumptions used. Using a modified Gail model and calculating an imputed absolute risk, the expected incidence of breast carcinoma in this population increased to rates of 170-180 per 100,000 in the next 10 years, a significant increase over the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-derived incidence rates from 1988 to 1992 of 31.6 per 100,000 for AI women in New Mexico and 78.9 per 100,000 for AN women. CONCLUSIONS. The model indicated a likelihood of increasing rates of breast carcinoma in the study population. The data obtained were useful in generating preliminary estimates of breast carcinoma risk in the study population, for which no prospective population survey has been completed. The inherent weaknesses in the current retrospective study indicated the need for a large-scale prospective data collection to confirm these exploratory findings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)906-912
Number of pages7
JournalCancer
Volume100
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2004

Fingerprint

North American Indians
Population
Breast Neoplasms
Birth Order
Alaska Natives
Menstruation
Incidence
Live Birth
Epidemiology
Retrospective Studies

Keywords

  • Alaska Native
  • American Indian
  • Breast carcinoma
  • Gail model

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cancer Research
  • Oncology

Cite this

Can the Gail Model be Useful in American Indian and Alaska Native Populations? / Kaur, Judith S; Roubidoux, Marilyn A.; Sloan, Jeff A; Novotny, Paul.

In: Cancer, Vol. 100, No. 5, 01.03.2004, p. 906-912.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kaur, Judith S ; Roubidoux, Marilyn A. ; Sloan, Jeff A ; Novotny, Paul. / Can the Gail Model be Useful in American Indian and Alaska Native Populations?. In: Cancer. 2004 ; Vol. 100, No. 5. pp. 906-912.
@article{e2c3b5088af741d7928a494ad50704dc,
title = "Can the Gail Model be Useful in American Indian and Alaska Native Populations?",
abstract = "BACKGROUND. Very little is known about breast carcinoma risk factors for American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) women undergoing screening. The Gail model has been a useful tool for predicting the risk of breast carcinoma in several populations. It has not been applied systematically to AI/AN women. METHODS. The current study was a retrospective review of 1458 screening mammograms performed for AI/AN women. The authors applied the Gail model to estimate both absolute risk and relative risk for breast carcinoma for AI/AN women screened in South Dakota, Arizona, and Alaska. RESULTS. The mean age of the women was 52.4 years. The onset of menses was not significantly different than expected. The average age at first birth was 20 years, very few women were nulliparous, and few women were age > 30 years at first live birth. The proportion of women reporting a first- or second-degree relative with breast carcinoma was similar to the proportion in the general population. The results of the model indicated an overall average relative risk that ranged from 1.42 to 2.69 compared with white American women, depending on the model assumptions used. Using a modified Gail model and calculating an imputed absolute risk, the expected incidence of breast carcinoma in this population increased to rates of 170-180 per 100,000 in the next 10 years, a significant increase over the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-derived incidence rates from 1988 to 1992 of 31.6 per 100,000 for AI women in New Mexico and 78.9 per 100,000 for AN women. CONCLUSIONS. The model indicated a likelihood of increasing rates of breast carcinoma in the study population. The data obtained were useful in generating preliminary estimates of breast carcinoma risk in the study population, for which no prospective population survey has been completed. The inherent weaknesses in the current retrospective study indicated the need for a large-scale prospective data collection to confirm these exploratory findings.",
keywords = "Alaska Native, American Indian, Breast carcinoma, Gail model",
author = "Kaur, {Judith S} and Roubidoux, {Marilyn A.} and Sloan, {Jeff A} and Paul Novotny",
year = "2004",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/cncr.20047",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "100",
pages = "906--912",
journal = "Cancer",
issn = "0008-543X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can the Gail Model be Useful in American Indian and Alaska Native Populations?

AU - Kaur, Judith S

AU - Roubidoux, Marilyn A.

AU - Sloan, Jeff A

AU - Novotny, Paul

PY - 2004/3/1

Y1 - 2004/3/1

N2 - BACKGROUND. Very little is known about breast carcinoma risk factors for American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) women undergoing screening. The Gail model has been a useful tool for predicting the risk of breast carcinoma in several populations. It has not been applied systematically to AI/AN women. METHODS. The current study was a retrospective review of 1458 screening mammograms performed for AI/AN women. The authors applied the Gail model to estimate both absolute risk and relative risk for breast carcinoma for AI/AN women screened in South Dakota, Arizona, and Alaska. RESULTS. The mean age of the women was 52.4 years. The onset of menses was not significantly different than expected. The average age at first birth was 20 years, very few women were nulliparous, and few women were age > 30 years at first live birth. The proportion of women reporting a first- or second-degree relative with breast carcinoma was similar to the proportion in the general population. The results of the model indicated an overall average relative risk that ranged from 1.42 to 2.69 compared with white American women, depending on the model assumptions used. Using a modified Gail model and calculating an imputed absolute risk, the expected incidence of breast carcinoma in this population increased to rates of 170-180 per 100,000 in the next 10 years, a significant increase over the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-derived incidence rates from 1988 to 1992 of 31.6 per 100,000 for AI women in New Mexico and 78.9 per 100,000 for AN women. CONCLUSIONS. The model indicated a likelihood of increasing rates of breast carcinoma in the study population. The data obtained were useful in generating preliminary estimates of breast carcinoma risk in the study population, for which no prospective population survey has been completed. The inherent weaknesses in the current retrospective study indicated the need for a large-scale prospective data collection to confirm these exploratory findings.

AB - BACKGROUND. Very little is known about breast carcinoma risk factors for American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) women undergoing screening. The Gail model has been a useful tool for predicting the risk of breast carcinoma in several populations. It has not been applied systematically to AI/AN women. METHODS. The current study was a retrospective review of 1458 screening mammograms performed for AI/AN women. The authors applied the Gail model to estimate both absolute risk and relative risk for breast carcinoma for AI/AN women screened in South Dakota, Arizona, and Alaska. RESULTS. The mean age of the women was 52.4 years. The onset of menses was not significantly different than expected. The average age at first birth was 20 years, very few women were nulliparous, and few women were age > 30 years at first live birth. The proportion of women reporting a first- or second-degree relative with breast carcinoma was similar to the proportion in the general population. The results of the model indicated an overall average relative risk that ranged from 1.42 to 2.69 compared with white American women, depending on the model assumptions used. Using a modified Gail model and calculating an imputed absolute risk, the expected incidence of breast carcinoma in this population increased to rates of 170-180 per 100,000 in the next 10 years, a significant increase over the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-derived incidence rates from 1988 to 1992 of 31.6 per 100,000 for AI women in New Mexico and 78.9 per 100,000 for AN women. CONCLUSIONS. The model indicated a likelihood of increasing rates of breast carcinoma in the study population. The data obtained were useful in generating preliminary estimates of breast carcinoma risk in the study population, for which no prospective population survey has been completed. The inherent weaknesses in the current retrospective study indicated the need for a large-scale prospective data collection to confirm these exploratory findings.

KW - Alaska Native

KW - American Indian

KW - Breast carcinoma

KW - Gail model

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1242291795&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1242291795&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/cncr.20047

DO - 10.1002/cncr.20047

M3 - Article

C2 - 14983484

AN - SCOPUS:1242291795

VL - 100

SP - 906

EP - 912

JO - Cancer

JF - Cancer

SN - 0008-543X

IS - 5

ER -