Can sarcoidosis and metastatic bone lesions be reliably differentiated on routine MRI?

Sandra Leigh Moore, Mark J. Kransdorf, Mark E. Schweitzer, Mark D. Murphey, James S. Babb

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. Sarcoidosis lesions revealed on MRI in the axial skeleton and long bones resemble osseous metastases, which can lead to a potentially significant misdiagnosis. We hypothesized that osseous sarcoidosis lesions could be differentiated from osseous metastases on MRI and sought to propose and evaluate features distinguishing these entities. MATERIALS AND METHODS. MR images obtained at 1.5 T of 34 subjects (22 with osseous metastatic disease, 12 with osseous sarcoidosis) with 79 single or multiple bone lesions (40 metastatic, 39 sarcoidal) were reviewed independently by two blinded, experienced musculoskeletal radiologists. Fluid-sensitive and T1-weighted images were viewed separately. Proposed discriminating features were peri- or intralesional fat, specified border characteristics, and the presence of an extraosseous soft-tissue mass. An additional feature for spinal lesions was posterior element involvement. On the basis of these criteria, the readers provided a binary diagnosis and confidence score. RESULTS. The overall sensitivity for both readers was 46.3% and specificity, 97.4%. T1- weighted images were associated with higher sensitivity than T2-weighted images (59.0% vs 34.1%, respectively; p = 0.025) and with comparable specificity (97.6% vs 97.2%, p = 0.91). Diagnostic accuracy was higher using the discriminators of a mass or posterior element involvement for metastasis (83.3%) than border characteristics (68.0%) or lesion fat (65.0%) for sarcoidosis; the latter two features provided near 100% specificity but poor sensitivity (14.3% and 0%, respectively). Readers reported higher confidence diagnosing osseous sarcoidosis lesions than metastatic lesions, with a trend for higher confidence with T1-weighted images (p = 0.088). CONCLUSION. Osseous sarcoidosis lesions cannot be reliably distinguished from metastatic lesions on routine MRI studies by readers experienced in evaluating these lesions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1387-1393
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Roentgenology
Volume198
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2012

Fingerprint

Sarcoidosis
Bone and Bones
Neoplasm Metastasis
Fats
Diagnostic Errors
Skeleton
Sensitivity and Specificity

Keywords

  • Bone metastases
  • Bone sarcoidosis
  • MRI

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Moore, S. L., Kransdorf, M. J., Schweitzer, M. E., Murphey, M. D., & Babb, J. S. (2012). Can sarcoidosis and metastatic bone lesions be reliably differentiated on routine MRI? American Journal of Roentgenology, 198(6), 1387-1393. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.11.7498

Can sarcoidosis and metastatic bone lesions be reliably differentiated on routine MRI? / Moore, Sandra Leigh; Kransdorf, Mark J.; Schweitzer, Mark E.; Murphey, Mark D.; Babb, James S.

In: American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 198, No. 6, 06.2012, p. 1387-1393.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Moore, SL, Kransdorf, MJ, Schweitzer, ME, Murphey, MD & Babb, JS 2012, 'Can sarcoidosis and metastatic bone lesions be reliably differentiated on routine MRI?', American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 198, no. 6, pp. 1387-1393. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.11.7498
Moore, Sandra Leigh ; Kransdorf, Mark J. ; Schweitzer, Mark E. ; Murphey, Mark D. ; Babb, James S. / Can sarcoidosis and metastatic bone lesions be reliably differentiated on routine MRI?. In: American Journal of Roentgenology. 2012 ; Vol. 198, No. 6. pp. 1387-1393.
@article{af2f5c94b04d45699564dfc795cd446d,
title = "Can sarcoidosis and metastatic bone lesions be reliably differentiated on routine MRI?",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE. Sarcoidosis lesions revealed on MRI in the axial skeleton and long bones resemble osseous metastases, which can lead to a potentially significant misdiagnosis. We hypothesized that osseous sarcoidosis lesions could be differentiated from osseous metastases on MRI and sought to propose and evaluate features distinguishing these entities. MATERIALS AND METHODS. MR images obtained at 1.5 T of 34 subjects (22 with osseous metastatic disease, 12 with osseous sarcoidosis) with 79 single or multiple bone lesions (40 metastatic, 39 sarcoidal) were reviewed independently by two blinded, experienced musculoskeletal radiologists. Fluid-sensitive and T1-weighted images were viewed separately. Proposed discriminating features were peri- or intralesional fat, specified border characteristics, and the presence of an extraosseous soft-tissue mass. An additional feature for spinal lesions was posterior element involvement. On the basis of these criteria, the readers provided a binary diagnosis and confidence score. RESULTS. The overall sensitivity for both readers was 46.3{\%} and specificity, 97.4{\%}. T1- weighted images were associated with higher sensitivity than T2-weighted images (59.0{\%} vs 34.1{\%}, respectively; p = 0.025) and with comparable specificity (97.6{\%} vs 97.2{\%}, p = 0.91). Diagnostic accuracy was higher using the discriminators of a mass or posterior element involvement for metastasis (83.3{\%}) than border characteristics (68.0{\%}) or lesion fat (65.0{\%}) for sarcoidosis; the latter two features provided near 100{\%} specificity but poor sensitivity (14.3{\%} and 0{\%}, respectively). Readers reported higher confidence diagnosing osseous sarcoidosis lesions than metastatic lesions, with a trend for higher confidence with T1-weighted images (p = 0.088). CONCLUSION. Osseous sarcoidosis lesions cannot be reliably distinguished from metastatic lesions on routine MRI studies by readers experienced in evaluating these lesions.",
keywords = "Bone metastases, Bone sarcoidosis, MRI",
author = "Moore, {Sandra Leigh} and Kransdorf, {Mark J.} and Schweitzer, {Mark E.} and Murphey, {Mark D.} and Babb, {James S.}",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
doi = "10.2214/AJR.11.7498",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "198",
pages = "1387--1393",
journal = "American Journal of Roentgenology",
issn = "0361-803X",
publisher = "American Roentgen Ray Society",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can sarcoidosis and metastatic bone lesions be reliably differentiated on routine MRI?

AU - Moore, Sandra Leigh

AU - Kransdorf, Mark J.

AU - Schweitzer, Mark E.

AU - Murphey, Mark D.

AU - Babb, James S.

PY - 2012/6

Y1 - 2012/6

N2 - OBJECTIVE. Sarcoidosis lesions revealed on MRI in the axial skeleton and long bones resemble osseous metastases, which can lead to a potentially significant misdiagnosis. We hypothesized that osseous sarcoidosis lesions could be differentiated from osseous metastases on MRI and sought to propose and evaluate features distinguishing these entities. MATERIALS AND METHODS. MR images obtained at 1.5 T of 34 subjects (22 with osseous metastatic disease, 12 with osseous sarcoidosis) with 79 single or multiple bone lesions (40 metastatic, 39 sarcoidal) were reviewed independently by two blinded, experienced musculoskeletal radiologists. Fluid-sensitive and T1-weighted images were viewed separately. Proposed discriminating features were peri- or intralesional fat, specified border characteristics, and the presence of an extraosseous soft-tissue mass. An additional feature for spinal lesions was posterior element involvement. On the basis of these criteria, the readers provided a binary diagnosis and confidence score. RESULTS. The overall sensitivity for both readers was 46.3% and specificity, 97.4%. T1- weighted images were associated with higher sensitivity than T2-weighted images (59.0% vs 34.1%, respectively; p = 0.025) and with comparable specificity (97.6% vs 97.2%, p = 0.91). Diagnostic accuracy was higher using the discriminators of a mass or posterior element involvement for metastasis (83.3%) than border characteristics (68.0%) or lesion fat (65.0%) for sarcoidosis; the latter two features provided near 100% specificity but poor sensitivity (14.3% and 0%, respectively). Readers reported higher confidence diagnosing osseous sarcoidosis lesions than metastatic lesions, with a trend for higher confidence with T1-weighted images (p = 0.088). CONCLUSION. Osseous sarcoidosis lesions cannot be reliably distinguished from metastatic lesions on routine MRI studies by readers experienced in evaluating these lesions.

AB - OBJECTIVE. Sarcoidosis lesions revealed on MRI in the axial skeleton and long bones resemble osseous metastases, which can lead to a potentially significant misdiagnosis. We hypothesized that osseous sarcoidosis lesions could be differentiated from osseous metastases on MRI and sought to propose and evaluate features distinguishing these entities. MATERIALS AND METHODS. MR images obtained at 1.5 T of 34 subjects (22 with osseous metastatic disease, 12 with osseous sarcoidosis) with 79 single or multiple bone lesions (40 metastatic, 39 sarcoidal) were reviewed independently by two blinded, experienced musculoskeletal radiologists. Fluid-sensitive and T1-weighted images were viewed separately. Proposed discriminating features were peri- or intralesional fat, specified border characteristics, and the presence of an extraosseous soft-tissue mass. An additional feature for spinal lesions was posterior element involvement. On the basis of these criteria, the readers provided a binary diagnosis and confidence score. RESULTS. The overall sensitivity for both readers was 46.3% and specificity, 97.4%. T1- weighted images were associated with higher sensitivity than T2-weighted images (59.0% vs 34.1%, respectively; p = 0.025) and with comparable specificity (97.6% vs 97.2%, p = 0.91). Diagnostic accuracy was higher using the discriminators of a mass or posterior element involvement for metastasis (83.3%) than border characteristics (68.0%) or lesion fat (65.0%) for sarcoidosis; the latter two features provided near 100% specificity but poor sensitivity (14.3% and 0%, respectively). Readers reported higher confidence diagnosing osseous sarcoidosis lesions than metastatic lesions, with a trend for higher confidence with T1-weighted images (p = 0.088). CONCLUSION. Osseous sarcoidosis lesions cannot be reliably distinguished from metastatic lesions on routine MRI studies by readers experienced in evaluating these lesions.

KW - Bone metastases

KW - Bone sarcoidosis

KW - MRI

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861610844&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84861610844&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2214/AJR.11.7498

DO - 10.2214/AJR.11.7498

M3 - Article

C2 - 22623553

AN - SCOPUS:84861610844

VL - 198

SP - 1387

EP - 1393

JO - American Journal of Roentgenology

JF - American Journal of Roentgenology

SN - 0361-803X

IS - 6

ER -