Can artificial techniques supply morally neutral human embryos for research? Part I. Creating novel categories of human embryos.

Nancy L. Jones, William P. Cheshire

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Manipulations of the molecular composition and formation of human embryos are posing vital new challenges to traditional concepts of human identity and procreation. Current trends in embryology in particular are reshaping the ethical question of how scientific research should treat experimentally derived embryos. Some investigators have argued that embryos created through artificial means are technologically novel entities that should be exempt from ethical restraints placed on research involving human embryos that come into being through natural processes. These include uniparental embryos derived through cloning or parthenogenesis, as well as multiparental, hybrid-parental, and xenohybrid-parental embryos. If confined to natural means many of these genetic unions could not occur, but through the intervention of technology, it is becoming possible to design and grow strange and unusual forms of embryos, in some cases using human gametes. Regardless of the genetic contributors or the processes used to fertilize and stimulate egg activation, in each case the new embryo represents an individual organism that begins a process of development. We conclude that the prospect of creating or redesigning new human life should be held to a stringent ethical standard of precaution, even higher than that of deciding to destroy existing embryonic life. Accordingly, we urge cautious ethical reflection and broad public discussion prior to deciding whether to permit embryologic research into novel forms of procreative means in nonhuman animals, to be further extended to humans.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)29-40
Number of pages12
JournalEthics & medicine : a Christian perspective on issues in bioethics
Volume21
Issue number1
StatePublished - 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Embryo Research
Embryonic Structures
Parthenogenesis
Embryology
Artificial
Embryo
Research
Germ Cells
Ovum
Organism Cloning
Research Personnel
Technology

Cite this

Can artificial techniques supply morally neutral human embryos for research? Part I. Creating novel categories of human embryos. / Jones, Nancy L.; Cheshire, William P.

In: Ethics & medicine : a Christian perspective on issues in bioethics, Vol. 21, No. 1, 2005, p. 29-40.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f19f11873148491581c565586fbccb4a,
title = "Can artificial techniques supply morally neutral human embryos for research? Part I. Creating novel categories of human embryos.",
abstract = "Manipulations of the molecular composition and formation of human embryos are posing vital new challenges to traditional concepts of human identity and procreation. Current trends in embryology in particular are reshaping the ethical question of how scientific research should treat experimentally derived embryos. Some investigators have argued that embryos created through artificial means are technologically novel entities that should be exempt from ethical restraints placed on research involving human embryos that come into being through natural processes. These include uniparental embryos derived through cloning or parthenogenesis, as well as multiparental, hybrid-parental, and xenohybrid-parental embryos. If confined to natural means many of these genetic unions could not occur, but through the intervention of technology, it is becoming possible to design and grow strange and unusual forms of embryos, in some cases using human gametes. Regardless of the genetic contributors or the processes used to fertilize and stimulate egg activation, in each case the new embryo represents an individual organism that begins a process of development. We conclude that the prospect of creating or redesigning new human life should be held to a stringent ethical standard of precaution, even higher than that of deciding to destroy existing embryonic life. Accordingly, we urge cautious ethical reflection and broad public discussion prior to deciding whether to permit embryologic research into novel forms of procreative means in nonhuman animals, to be further extended to humans.",
author = "Jones, {Nancy L.} and Cheshire, {William P.}",
year = "2005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "29--40",
journal = "Ethics and Medicine",
issn = "0266-688X",
publisher = "Bioethics Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can artificial techniques supply morally neutral human embryos for research? Part I. Creating novel categories of human embryos.

AU - Jones, Nancy L.

AU - Cheshire, William P.

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - Manipulations of the molecular composition and formation of human embryos are posing vital new challenges to traditional concepts of human identity and procreation. Current trends in embryology in particular are reshaping the ethical question of how scientific research should treat experimentally derived embryos. Some investigators have argued that embryos created through artificial means are technologically novel entities that should be exempt from ethical restraints placed on research involving human embryos that come into being through natural processes. These include uniparental embryos derived through cloning or parthenogenesis, as well as multiparental, hybrid-parental, and xenohybrid-parental embryos. If confined to natural means many of these genetic unions could not occur, but through the intervention of technology, it is becoming possible to design and grow strange and unusual forms of embryos, in some cases using human gametes. Regardless of the genetic contributors or the processes used to fertilize and stimulate egg activation, in each case the new embryo represents an individual organism that begins a process of development. We conclude that the prospect of creating or redesigning new human life should be held to a stringent ethical standard of precaution, even higher than that of deciding to destroy existing embryonic life. Accordingly, we urge cautious ethical reflection and broad public discussion prior to deciding whether to permit embryologic research into novel forms of procreative means in nonhuman animals, to be further extended to humans.

AB - Manipulations of the molecular composition and formation of human embryos are posing vital new challenges to traditional concepts of human identity and procreation. Current trends in embryology in particular are reshaping the ethical question of how scientific research should treat experimentally derived embryos. Some investigators have argued that embryos created through artificial means are technologically novel entities that should be exempt from ethical restraints placed on research involving human embryos that come into being through natural processes. These include uniparental embryos derived through cloning or parthenogenesis, as well as multiparental, hybrid-parental, and xenohybrid-parental embryos. If confined to natural means many of these genetic unions could not occur, but through the intervention of technology, it is becoming possible to design and grow strange and unusual forms of embryos, in some cases using human gametes. Regardless of the genetic contributors or the processes used to fertilize and stimulate egg activation, in each case the new embryo represents an individual organism that begins a process of development. We conclude that the prospect of creating or redesigning new human life should be held to a stringent ethical standard of precaution, even higher than that of deciding to destroy existing embryonic life. Accordingly, we urge cautious ethical reflection and broad public discussion prior to deciding whether to permit embryologic research into novel forms of procreative means in nonhuman animals, to be further extended to humans.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=21744434072&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=21744434072&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 29

EP - 40

JO - Ethics and Medicine

JF - Ethics and Medicine

SN - 0266-688X

IS - 1

ER -