Bringing the patient voice into emergency care

Marc A. Probst, Erik P. Hess

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Introduction In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis placed on the importance of patient engagement in both chronic and acute care. Patient engagement can be broadly defined as active patient involvement in their healthcare to strengthen their influence on medical decisions and behaviors. A key component of patient engagement is shared decision-making (SDM). SDM is defined as a process by which patients and providers consider outcome probabilities and patient preferences and reach a healthcare decision based on mutual agreement. An SDM approach to clinical decisions in the emergency department (ED) is a reliable way to have the patient's voice heard with regard to their values, preferences, and unique circumstances. In this chapter, we describe concepts underlying SDM, review the existing literature on patient decision aids and SDM in the ED setting, and offer three clinical vignettes to illustrate the process of SDM in emergency care. What Is Shared Decision-Making? SDM is an approach in which clinicians actively bring the patient's voice into the medical encounter. Although the patient's role has classically been relegated to providing a history of the present illness and answering specific clinical questions, patients can have a more active role through asking questions, voicing concerns, and expressing values and preferences. Charles, Gafni, and Whelan described a conceptual model of SDM in the context of medical encounters for potentially life-threatening chronic conditions. They proposed four key characteristics of SDM: (1) at least two participants must be involved – physician and patient (or surrogate); (2) both parties share information; (3) both parties build consensus regarding the patient's preferred treatment; and (4) a mutual agreement is reached on the treatment to pursue. They describe a spectrum from paternalistic, physician-directed decision-making to fully informed, patient-directed decision-making, with SDM lying in the middle. The purported benefits of such an approach include increased patient satisfaction, increased adherence to treatment, and improved functional status. SDM is also appropriate for ED care. All ED encounters entail clinical decisions, be they diagnostic, therapeutic, or dispositional (i.e., whether the patient is admitted or discharged from the ED).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationValue and Quality Innovations in Acute and Emergency Care
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages46-56
Number of pages11
ISBN (Electronic)9781316779965
ISBN (Print)9781316625637
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Emergency Medical Services
Decision Making
Patient Participation
Hospital Emergency Service
Delivery of Health Care
Physicians
Decision Support Techniques
Patient Preference
Therapeutics
Patient Satisfaction
Consensus

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Probst, M. A., & Hess, E. P. (2017). Bringing the patient voice into emergency care. In Value and Quality Innovations in Acute and Emergency Care (pp. 46-56). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316779965.008

Bringing the patient voice into emergency care. / Probst, Marc A.; Hess, Erik P.

Value and Quality Innovations in Acute and Emergency Care. Cambridge University Press, 2017. p. 46-56.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Probst, MA & Hess, EP 2017, Bringing the patient voice into emergency care. in Value and Quality Innovations in Acute and Emergency Care. Cambridge University Press, pp. 46-56. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316779965.008
Probst MA, Hess EP. Bringing the patient voice into emergency care. In Value and Quality Innovations in Acute and Emergency Care. Cambridge University Press. 2017. p. 46-56 https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316779965.008
Probst, Marc A. ; Hess, Erik P. / Bringing the patient voice into emergency care. Value and Quality Innovations in Acute and Emergency Care. Cambridge University Press, 2017. pp. 46-56
@inbook{562262688b8a4e62a23e324da2c69b4a,
title = "Bringing the patient voice into emergency care",
abstract = "Introduction In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis placed on the importance of patient engagement in both chronic and acute care. Patient engagement can be broadly defined as active patient involvement in their healthcare to strengthen their influence on medical decisions and behaviors. A key component of patient engagement is shared decision-making (SDM). SDM is defined as a process by which patients and providers consider outcome probabilities and patient preferences and reach a healthcare decision based on mutual agreement. An SDM approach to clinical decisions in the emergency department (ED) is a reliable way to have the patient's voice heard with regard to their values, preferences, and unique circumstances. In this chapter, we describe concepts underlying SDM, review the existing literature on patient decision aids and SDM in the ED setting, and offer three clinical vignettes to illustrate the process of SDM in emergency care. What Is Shared Decision-Making? SDM is an approach in which clinicians actively bring the patient's voice into the medical encounter. Although the patient's role has classically been relegated to providing a history of the present illness and answering specific clinical questions, patients can have a more active role through asking questions, voicing concerns, and expressing values and preferences. Charles, Gafni, and Whelan described a conceptual model of SDM in the context of medical encounters for potentially life-threatening chronic conditions. They proposed four key characteristics of SDM: (1) at least two participants must be involved – physician and patient (or surrogate); (2) both parties share information; (3) both parties build consensus regarding the patient's preferred treatment; and (4) a mutual agreement is reached on the treatment to pursue. They describe a spectrum from paternalistic, physician-directed decision-making to fully informed, patient-directed decision-making, with SDM lying in the middle. The purported benefits of such an approach include increased patient satisfaction, increased adherence to treatment, and improved functional status. SDM is also appropriate for ED care. All ED encounters entail clinical decisions, be they diagnostic, therapeutic, or dispositional (i.e., whether the patient is admitted or discharged from the ED).",
author = "Probst, {Marc A.} and Hess, {Erik P.}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/9781316779965.008",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781316625637",
pages = "46--56",
booktitle = "Value and Quality Innovations in Acute and Emergency Care",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
address = "United States",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Bringing the patient voice into emergency care

AU - Probst, Marc A.

AU - Hess, Erik P.

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Introduction In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis placed on the importance of patient engagement in both chronic and acute care. Patient engagement can be broadly defined as active patient involvement in their healthcare to strengthen their influence on medical decisions and behaviors. A key component of patient engagement is shared decision-making (SDM). SDM is defined as a process by which patients and providers consider outcome probabilities and patient preferences and reach a healthcare decision based on mutual agreement. An SDM approach to clinical decisions in the emergency department (ED) is a reliable way to have the patient's voice heard with regard to their values, preferences, and unique circumstances. In this chapter, we describe concepts underlying SDM, review the existing literature on patient decision aids and SDM in the ED setting, and offer three clinical vignettes to illustrate the process of SDM in emergency care. What Is Shared Decision-Making? SDM is an approach in which clinicians actively bring the patient's voice into the medical encounter. Although the patient's role has classically been relegated to providing a history of the present illness and answering specific clinical questions, patients can have a more active role through asking questions, voicing concerns, and expressing values and preferences. Charles, Gafni, and Whelan described a conceptual model of SDM in the context of medical encounters for potentially life-threatening chronic conditions. They proposed four key characteristics of SDM: (1) at least two participants must be involved – physician and patient (or surrogate); (2) both parties share information; (3) both parties build consensus regarding the patient's preferred treatment; and (4) a mutual agreement is reached on the treatment to pursue. They describe a spectrum from paternalistic, physician-directed decision-making to fully informed, patient-directed decision-making, with SDM lying in the middle. The purported benefits of such an approach include increased patient satisfaction, increased adherence to treatment, and improved functional status. SDM is also appropriate for ED care. All ED encounters entail clinical decisions, be they diagnostic, therapeutic, or dispositional (i.e., whether the patient is admitted or discharged from the ED).

AB - Introduction In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis placed on the importance of patient engagement in both chronic and acute care. Patient engagement can be broadly defined as active patient involvement in their healthcare to strengthen their influence on medical decisions and behaviors. A key component of patient engagement is shared decision-making (SDM). SDM is defined as a process by which patients and providers consider outcome probabilities and patient preferences and reach a healthcare decision based on mutual agreement. An SDM approach to clinical decisions in the emergency department (ED) is a reliable way to have the patient's voice heard with regard to their values, preferences, and unique circumstances. In this chapter, we describe concepts underlying SDM, review the existing literature on patient decision aids and SDM in the ED setting, and offer three clinical vignettes to illustrate the process of SDM in emergency care. What Is Shared Decision-Making? SDM is an approach in which clinicians actively bring the patient's voice into the medical encounter. Although the patient's role has classically been relegated to providing a history of the present illness and answering specific clinical questions, patients can have a more active role through asking questions, voicing concerns, and expressing values and preferences. Charles, Gafni, and Whelan described a conceptual model of SDM in the context of medical encounters for potentially life-threatening chronic conditions. They proposed four key characteristics of SDM: (1) at least two participants must be involved – physician and patient (or surrogate); (2) both parties share information; (3) both parties build consensus regarding the patient's preferred treatment; and (4) a mutual agreement is reached on the treatment to pursue. They describe a spectrum from paternalistic, physician-directed decision-making to fully informed, patient-directed decision-making, with SDM lying in the middle. The purported benefits of such an approach include increased patient satisfaction, increased adherence to treatment, and improved functional status. SDM is also appropriate for ED care. All ED encounters entail clinical decisions, be they diagnostic, therapeutic, or dispositional (i.e., whether the patient is admitted or discharged from the ED).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048188943&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048188943&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/9781316779965.008

DO - 10.1017/9781316779965.008

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781316625637

SP - 46

EP - 56

BT - Value and Quality Innovations in Acute and Emergency Care

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -