Bridging the gap between experimental and nonexperimental neuroepidemiology, and ultimately -between neuroepidemiological research and practice: Round table discussion at the first international congress on clinical neurology and epidemiology

Valery Feigin, John F. Kurtzke, Amos Korczyn, Ettore Beghi, Allen W Brown, M. G. Hennerici, B. Dubois, P. M. Rothwell, S. Evers, P. M. Preux, F. Bermejo Pareja, P. M. Lavados, K. Nagata, G. Logroscino, J. Kesselring, D. Bennett, S. Barker-Collo, B. Stegmayr, P. Chazot, S. LiM. Brainin, W. Wang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A highlight of the congress was an interactive and inclusive discussion of the existing gaps between clinical neurology and epidemiology and the ways of bridging these gaps. Some perceptions, challenges and scientific issues between experimental and nonexperimental neuroepidemiology were brought to light. Recognizing that all study designs have advantages and disadvantages, panelists stressed that studies should aim to complement each other while answering important research- or practice-related questions. Advocated strategies included introducing more epidemiology into the medical school or residency curriculum, developing consistency in the reporting of epidemiological data to improving the strength and utility of the evidence, as well as nurturing collaborations that recognize the usefulness of both experimental and nonexperimental epidemiological studies. These strategies will in the end benefit clinical practice. Indeed, clinical knowledge improves with experience and critical scientific evidence that can change perceptions, yet, individualized disease management will probably always remain an art rather than an exact science. Nevertheless, strong epidemiological studies and collaborations can influence government and public health policies. Bridging the gap between neuroepidemiological research and practice whether through improved communication, education or basic science is clearly a pressing challenge that requires our concerted and sustained effort.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)296-304
Number of pages9
JournalNeuroepidemiology
Volume33
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2009

Fingerprint

Neurology
Epidemiologic Studies
Epidemiology
Public Policy
Art
Internship and Residency
Disease Management
Health Policy
Medical Schools
Research
Curriculum
Research Design
Public Health
Education

Keywords

  • Clinical knowledge
  • Collaboration
  • Education
  • Epidemiology
  • Evidencebased medicine
  • Neurology
  • Perceptions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Bridging the gap between experimental and nonexperimental neuroepidemiology, and ultimately -between neuroepidemiological research and practice : Round table discussion at the first international congress on clinical neurology and epidemiology. / Feigin, Valery; Kurtzke, John F.; Korczyn, Amos; Beghi, Ettore; Brown, Allen W; Hennerici, M. G.; Dubois, B.; Rothwell, P. M.; Evers, S.; Preux, P. M.; Pareja, F. Bermejo; Lavados, P. M.; Nagata, K.; Logroscino, G.; Kesselring, J.; Bennett, D.; Barker-Collo, S.; Stegmayr, B.; Chazot, P.; Li, S.; Brainin, M.; Wang, W.

In: Neuroepidemiology, Vol. 33, No. 4, 12.2009, p. 296-304.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Feigin, V, Kurtzke, JF, Korczyn, A, Beghi, E, Brown, AW, Hennerici, MG, Dubois, B, Rothwell, PM, Evers, S, Preux, PM, Pareja, FB, Lavados, PM, Nagata, K, Logroscino, G, Kesselring, J, Bennett, D, Barker-Collo, S, Stegmayr, B, Chazot, P, Li, S, Brainin, M & Wang, W 2009, 'Bridging the gap between experimental and nonexperimental neuroepidemiology, and ultimately -between neuroepidemiological research and practice: Round table discussion at the first international congress on clinical neurology and epidemiology', Neuroepidemiology, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 296-304. https://doi.org/10.1159/000252942
Feigin, Valery ; Kurtzke, John F. ; Korczyn, Amos ; Beghi, Ettore ; Brown, Allen W ; Hennerici, M. G. ; Dubois, B. ; Rothwell, P. M. ; Evers, S. ; Preux, P. M. ; Pareja, F. Bermejo ; Lavados, P. M. ; Nagata, K. ; Logroscino, G. ; Kesselring, J. ; Bennett, D. ; Barker-Collo, S. ; Stegmayr, B. ; Chazot, P. ; Li, S. ; Brainin, M. ; Wang, W. / Bridging the gap between experimental and nonexperimental neuroepidemiology, and ultimately -between neuroepidemiological research and practice : Round table discussion at the first international congress on clinical neurology and epidemiology. In: Neuroepidemiology. 2009 ; Vol. 33, No. 4. pp. 296-304.
@article{3d5e83113c684005bea1932c08602d6d,
title = "Bridging the gap between experimental and nonexperimental neuroepidemiology, and ultimately -between neuroepidemiological research and practice: Round table discussion at the first international congress on clinical neurology and epidemiology",
abstract = "A highlight of the congress was an interactive and inclusive discussion of the existing gaps between clinical neurology and epidemiology and the ways of bridging these gaps. Some perceptions, challenges and scientific issues between experimental and nonexperimental neuroepidemiology were brought to light. Recognizing that all study designs have advantages and disadvantages, panelists stressed that studies should aim to complement each other while answering important research- or practice-related questions. Advocated strategies included introducing more epidemiology into the medical school or residency curriculum, developing consistency in the reporting of epidemiological data to improving the strength and utility of the evidence, as well as nurturing collaborations that recognize the usefulness of both experimental and nonexperimental epidemiological studies. These strategies will in the end benefit clinical practice. Indeed, clinical knowledge improves with experience and critical scientific evidence that can change perceptions, yet, individualized disease management will probably always remain an art rather than an exact science. Nevertheless, strong epidemiological studies and collaborations can influence government and public health policies. Bridging the gap between neuroepidemiological research and practice whether through improved communication, education or basic science is clearly a pressing challenge that requires our concerted and sustained effort.",
keywords = "Clinical knowledge, Collaboration, Education, Epidemiology, Evidencebased medicine, Neurology, Perceptions",
author = "Valery Feigin and Kurtzke, {John F.} and Amos Korczyn and Ettore Beghi and Brown, {Allen W} and Hennerici, {M. G.} and B. Dubois and Rothwell, {P. M.} and S. Evers and Preux, {P. M.} and Pareja, {F. Bermejo} and Lavados, {P. M.} and K. Nagata and G. Logroscino and J. Kesselring and D. Bennett and S. Barker-Collo and B. Stegmayr and P. Chazot and S. Li and M. Brainin and W. Wang",
year = "2009",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1159/000252942",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "296--304",
journal = "Neuroepidemiology",
issn = "0251-5350",
publisher = "S. Karger AG",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bridging the gap between experimental and nonexperimental neuroepidemiology, and ultimately -between neuroepidemiological research and practice

T2 - Round table discussion at the first international congress on clinical neurology and epidemiology

AU - Feigin, Valery

AU - Kurtzke, John F.

AU - Korczyn, Amos

AU - Beghi, Ettore

AU - Brown, Allen W

AU - Hennerici, M. G.

AU - Dubois, B.

AU - Rothwell, P. M.

AU - Evers, S.

AU - Preux, P. M.

AU - Pareja, F. Bermejo

AU - Lavados, P. M.

AU - Nagata, K.

AU - Logroscino, G.

AU - Kesselring, J.

AU - Bennett, D.

AU - Barker-Collo, S.

AU - Stegmayr, B.

AU - Chazot, P.

AU - Li, S.

AU - Brainin, M.

AU - Wang, W.

PY - 2009/12

Y1 - 2009/12

N2 - A highlight of the congress was an interactive and inclusive discussion of the existing gaps between clinical neurology and epidemiology and the ways of bridging these gaps. Some perceptions, challenges and scientific issues between experimental and nonexperimental neuroepidemiology were brought to light. Recognizing that all study designs have advantages and disadvantages, panelists stressed that studies should aim to complement each other while answering important research- or practice-related questions. Advocated strategies included introducing more epidemiology into the medical school or residency curriculum, developing consistency in the reporting of epidemiological data to improving the strength and utility of the evidence, as well as nurturing collaborations that recognize the usefulness of both experimental and nonexperimental epidemiological studies. These strategies will in the end benefit clinical practice. Indeed, clinical knowledge improves with experience and critical scientific evidence that can change perceptions, yet, individualized disease management will probably always remain an art rather than an exact science. Nevertheless, strong epidemiological studies and collaborations can influence government and public health policies. Bridging the gap between neuroepidemiological research and practice whether through improved communication, education or basic science is clearly a pressing challenge that requires our concerted and sustained effort.

AB - A highlight of the congress was an interactive and inclusive discussion of the existing gaps between clinical neurology and epidemiology and the ways of bridging these gaps. Some perceptions, challenges and scientific issues between experimental and nonexperimental neuroepidemiology were brought to light. Recognizing that all study designs have advantages and disadvantages, panelists stressed that studies should aim to complement each other while answering important research- or practice-related questions. Advocated strategies included introducing more epidemiology into the medical school or residency curriculum, developing consistency in the reporting of epidemiological data to improving the strength and utility of the evidence, as well as nurturing collaborations that recognize the usefulness of both experimental and nonexperimental epidemiological studies. These strategies will in the end benefit clinical practice. Indeed, clinical knowledge improves with experience and critical scientific evidence that can change perceptions, yet, individualized disease management will probably always remain an art rather than an exact science. Nevertheless, strong epidemiological studies and collaborations can influence government and public health policies. Bridging the gap between neuroepidemiological research and practice whether through improved communication, education or basic science is clearly a pressing challenge that requires our concerted and sustained effort.

KW - Clinical knowledge

KW - Collaboration

KW - Education

KW - Epidemiology

KW - Evidencebased medicine

KW - Neurology

KW - Perceptions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=73349093101&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=73349093101&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1159/000252942

DO - 10.1159/000252942

M3 - Article

C2 - 20443239

AN - SCOPUS:73349093101

VL - 33

SP - 296

EP - 304

JO - Neuroepidemiology

JF - Neuroepidemiology

SN - 0251-5350

IS - 4

ER -