Birth order and risk of non-hodgkin lymphoma - True association or bias?

Andrew E. Grulich, Claire M. Vajdic, Michael O. Falster, Eleanor Kane, Karin Ekstrom Smedby, Paige M. Bracci, Silvia De Sanjose, Nikolaus Becker, Jenny Turner, Otoniel Martinez-Maza, Mads Melbye, Eric A. Engels, Paolo Vineis, Adele Seniori Costantini, Elizabeth A. Holly, John J. Spinelli, Carlo La Vecchia, Tongzhang Zheng, Brian C H Chiu, Silvia FranceschiPierluigi Cocco, Marc Maynadié, Lenka Foretova, Anthony Staines, Paul Brennan, Scott Davis, Richard K. Severson, James R Cerhan, Elizabeth C. Breen, Brenda Birmann, Wendy Cozen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There is inconsistent evidence that increasing birth order may be associated with risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). The authors examined the association between birth order and related variables and NHL risk in a pooled analysis (1983-2005) of 13,535 cases and 16,427 controls from 18 case-control studies within the International Lymphoma Epidemiology Consortium (InterLymph). Overall, the authors found no significant association between increasing birth order and risk of NHL (P-trend = 0.082) and significant heterogeneity. However, a significant association was present for a number of B- and T-cell NHL subtypes. There was considerable variation in the study-specific risks which was partly explained by study design and participant characteristics. In particular, a significant positive association was present in population-based studies, which had lower response rates in cases and controls, but not in hospital-based studies. A significant positive association was present in higher-socioeconomic-status (SES) participants only. Results were very similar for the related variable of sibship size. The known correlation of high birth order with low SES suggests that selection bias related to SES may be responsible for the association between birth order and NHL.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)621-630
Number of pages10
JournalAmerican Journal of Epidemiology
Volume172
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 15 2010

Fingerprint

Birth Order
Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
Social Class
Selection Bias
T-Cell Lymphoma
Case-Control Studies
Lymphoma
Epidemiology
Population

Keywords

  • birth order
  • case-control studies
  • lymphoma, non-Hodgkin
  • selection bias
  • social class

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Grulich, A. E., Vajdic, C. M., Falster, M. O., Kane, E., Smedby, K. E., Bracci, P. M., ... Cozen, W. (2010). Birth order and risk of non-hodgkin lymphoma - True association or bias? American Journal of Epidemiology, 172(6), 621-630. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwq167

Birth order and risk of non-hodgkin lymphoma - True association or bias? / Grulich, Andrew E.; Vajdic, Claire M.; Falster, Michael O.; Kane, Eleanor; Smedby, Karin Ekstrom; Bracci, Paige M.; De Sanjose, Silvia; Becker, Nikolaus; Turner, Jenny; Martinez-Maza, Otoniel; Melbye, Mads; Engels, Eric A.; Vineis, Paolo; Costantini, Adele Seniori; Holly, Elizabeth A.; Spinelli, John J.; La Vecchia, Carlo; Zheng, Tongzhang; Chiu, Brian C H; Franceschi, Silvia; Cocco, Pierluigi; Maynadié, Marc; Foretova, Lenka; Staines, Anthony; Brennan, Paul; Davis, Scott; Severson, Richard K.; Cerhan, James R; Breen, Elizabeth C.; Birmann, Brenda; Cozen, Wendy.

In: American Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 172, No. 6, 15.09.2010, p. 621-630.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Grulich, AE, Vajdic, CM, Falster, MO, Kane, E, Smedby, KE, Bracci, PM, De Sanjose, S, Becker, N, Turner, J, Martinez-Maza, O, Melbye, M, Engels, EA, Vineis, P, Costantini, AS, Holly, EA, Spinelli, JJ, La Vecchia, C, Zheng, T, Chiu, BCH, Franceschi, S, Cocco, P, Maynadié, M, Foretova, L, Staines, A, Brennan, P, Davis, S, Severson, RK, Cerhan, JR, Breen, EC, Birmann, B & Cozen, W 2010, 'Birth order and risk of non-hodgkin lymphoma - True association or bias?', American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 172, no. 6, pp. 621-630. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwq167
Grulich AE, Vajdic CM, Falster MO, Kane E, Smedby KE, Bracci PM et al. Birth order and risk of non-hodgkin lymphoma - True association or bias? American Journal of Epidemiology. 2010 Sep 15;172(6):621-630. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwq167
Grulich, Andrew E. ; Vajdic, Claire M. ; Falster, Michael O. ; Kane, Eleanor ; Smedby, Karin Ekstrom ; Bracci, Paige M. ; De Sanjose, Silvia ; Becker, Nikolaus ; Turner, Jenny ; Martinez-Maza, Otoniel ; Melbye, Mads ; Engels, Eric A. ; Vineis, Paolo ; Costantini, Adele Seniori ; Holly, Elizabeth A. ; Spinelli, John J. ; La Vecchia, Carlo ; Zheng, Tongzhang ; Chiu, Brian C H ; Franceschi, Silvia ; Cocco, Pierluigi ; Maynadié, Marc ; Foretova, Lenka ; Staines, Anthony ; Brennan, Paul ; Davis, Scott ; Severson, Richard K. ; Cerhan, James R ; Breen, Elizabeth C. ; Birmann, Brenda ; Cozen, Wendy. / Birth order and risk of non-hodgkin lymphoma - True association or bias?. In: American Journal of Epidemiology. 2010 ; Vol. 172, No. 6. pp. 621-630.
@article{85c9567d25244ea99432848ab5590cc9,
title = "Birth order and risk of non-hodgkin lymphoma - True association or bias?",
abstract = "There is inconsistent evidence that increasing birth order may be associated with risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). The authors examined the association between birth order and related variables and NHL risk in a pooled analysis (1983-2005) of 13,535 cases and 16,427 controls from 18 case-control studies within the International Lymphoma Epidemiology Consortium (InterLymph). Overall, the authors found no significant association between increasing birth order and risk of NHL (P-trend = 0.082) and significant heterogeneity. However, a significant association was present for a number of B- and T-cell NHL subtypes. There was considerable variation in the study-specific risks which was partly explained by study design and participant characteristics. In particular, a significant positive association was present in population-based studies, which had lower response rates in cases and controls, but not in hospital-based studies. A significant positive association was present in higher-socioeconomic-status (SES) participants only. Results were very similar for the related variable of sibship size. The known correlation of high birth order with low SES suggests that selection bias related to SES may be responsible for the association between birth order and NHL.",
keywords = "birth order, case-control studies, lymphoma, non-Hodgkin, selection bias, social class",
author = "Grulich, {Andrew E.} and Vajdic, {Claire M.} and Falster, {Michael O.} and Eleanor Kane and Smedby, {Karin Ekstrom} and Bracci, {Paige M.} and {De Sanjose}, Silvia and Nikolaus Becker and Jenny Turner and Otoniel Martinez-Maza and Mads Melbye and Engels, {Eric A.} and Paolo Vineis and Costantini, {Adele Seniori} and Holly, {Elizabeth A.} and Spinelli, {John J.} and {La Vecchia}, Carlo and Tongzhang Zheng and Chiu, {Brian C H} and Silvia Franceschi and Pierluigi Cocco and Marc Maynadi{\'e} and Lenka Foretova and Anthony Staines and Paul Brennan and Scott Davis and Severson, {Richard K.} and Cerhan, {James R} and Breen, {Elizabeth C.} and Brenda Birmann and Wendy Cozen",
year = "2010",
month = "9",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1093/aje/kwq167",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "172",
pages = "621--630",
journal = "American Journal of Epidemiology",
issn = "0002-9262",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Birth order and risk of non-hodgkin lymphoma - True association or bias?

AU - Grulich, Andrew E.

AU - Vajdic, Claire M.

AU - Falster, Michael O.

AU - Kane, Eleanor

AU - Smedby, Karin Ekstrom

AU - Bracci, Paige M.

AU - De Sanjose, Silvia

AU - Becker, Nikolaus

AU - Turner, Jenny

AU - Martinez-Maza, Otoniel

AU - Melbye, Mads

AU - Engels, Eric A.

AU - Vineis, Paolo

AU - Costantini, Adele Seniori

AU - Holly, Elizabeth A.

AU - Spinelli, John J.

AU - La Vecchia, Carlo

AU - Zheng, Tongzhang

AU - Chiu, Brian C H

AU - Franceschi, Silvia

AU - Cocco, Pierluigi

AU - Maynadié, Marc

AU - Foretova, Lenka

AU - Staines, Anthony

AU - Brennan, Paul

AU - Davis, Scott

AU - Severson, Richard K.

AU - Cerhan, James R

AU - Breen, Elizabeth C.

AU - Birmann, Brenda

AU - Cozen, Wendy

PY - 2010/9/15

Y1 - 2010/9/15

N2 - There is inconsistent evidence that increasing birth order may be associated with risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). The authors examined the association between birth order and related variables and NHL risk in a pooled analysis (1983-2005) of 13,535 cases and 16,427 controls from 18 case-control studies within the International Lymphoma Epidemiology Consortium (InterLymph). Overall, the authors found no significant association between increasing birth order and risk of NHL (P-trend = 0.082) and significant heterogeneity. However, a significant association was present for a number of B- and T-cell NHL subtypes. There was considerable variation in the study-specific risks which was partly explained by study design and participant characteristics. In particular, a significant positive association was present in population-based studies, which had lower response rates in cases and controls, but not in hospital-based studies. A significant positive association was present in higher-socioeconomic-status (SES) participants only. Results were very similar for the related variable of sibship size. The known correlation of high birth order with low SES suggests that selection bias related to SES may be responsible for the association between birth order and NHL.

AB - There is inconsistent evidence that increasing birth order may be associated with risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). The authors examined the association between birth order and related variables and NHL risk in a pooled analysis (1983-2005) of 13,535 cases and 16,427 controls from 18 case-control studies within the International Lymphoma Epidemiology Consortium (InterLymph). Overall, the authors found no significant association between increasing birth order and risk of NHL (P-trend = 0.082) and significant heterogeneity. However, a significant association was present for a number of B- and T-cell NHL subtypes. There was considerable variation in the study-specific risks which was partly explained by study design and participant characteristics. In particular, a significant positive association was present in population-based studies, which had lower response rates in cases and controls, but not in hospital-based studies. A significant positive association was present in higher-socioeconomic-status (SES) participants only. Results were very similar for the related variable of sibship size. The known correlation of high birth order with low SES suggests that selection bias related to SES may be responsible for the association between birth order and NHL.

KW - birth order

KW - case-control studies

KW - lymphoma, non-Hodgkin

KW - selection bias

KW - social class

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77956927769&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77956927769&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/aje/kwq167

DO - 10.1093/aje/kwq167

M3 - Article

C2 - 20720098

AN - SCOPUS:77956927769

VL - 172

SP - 621

EP - 630

JO - American Journal of Epidemiology

JF - American Journal of Epidemiology

SN - 0002-9262

IS - 6

ER -