Biomechanical evaluation of posterior cervical stabilization after a wide laminectomy

Mark R. Grubb, Bradford L. Currier, Jim Stone, Karen E. Warden, Kai N. An

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study Design: In vitro biomechanical investigation with nondestructive and destructive testing in a human cadaverio model simulating wide postlaminectomy condition. Objectives. To determine the relative stability conferred by a posterior cervical spinal rod system and posterior cervical plating. Summary of Background Data. Posterior cervical plate fixation has been shown to be biomechanically superior to wiling techniques but lateral mass screws may injure neurovascular structures or facet joints if they are inserted improperly. A cervical rod system has been developed to enhance the safety of lateral mass instrumentation. Methods. The cervical spines of 12 cadavers under went biomechanical testing. After completion of the nondestructive intact testing; a wide laminectomy with subtotal facetectomies from C4 to C6 was performed. The specimens in two subgroups (group A, cervical spine rods with unicortical fixation, and group B reconstruction plates with bicortical fixation) were tested in flexion, lateral bending and torsion. Finally destructive testing inflexion was performed. Stiffness, neutral zone failure moment, energy to failure, and mechanism of failure were determined for each specimen. The data were analyzed using paired tests and ANOVA. Results. Group B had a greater mean screw, torque value. The instrumented constructs had a greater stiffness ratio (instrumented/intact) then the intact specimens in flexion, lateral bending, and torsional testing. Group A had a significantly greater flexural stiffness than Group B. Neutral zone ratio values were significantly lower during flexural testing for the cervical rod construct. Destructive testing resulted in significantly grater failure moment and energy to failure values for group A. In the cervical rod construct failure occurred primarily by superior screw loosening with pull- out from the lateral mass. Reconstruction plates consistently failed with fracture of the lateral mass and superior screw loosening. Conclusion. Significantly greater stability was noted in the cervical rod construct during nondestructive and destructive flexural testing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1948-1954
Number of pages7
JournalSpine
Volume22
Issue number17
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 1997

Fingerprint

Laminectomy
Spine
Zygapophyseal Joint
Torque
Cadaver
Analysis of Variance
Safety
In Vitro Techniques

Keywords

  • Biomechanics
  • Cervical spine
  • Posterior instrumentation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Grubb, M. R., Currier, B. L., Stone, J., Warden, K. E., & An, K. N. (1997). Biomechanical evaluation of posterior cervical stabilization after a wide laminectomy. Spine, 22(17), 1948-1954. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199709010-00002

Biomechanical evaluation of posterior cervical stabilization after a wide laminectomy. / Grubb, Mark R.; Currier, Bradford L.; Stone, Jim; Warden, Karen E.; An, Kai N.

In: Spine, Vol. 22, No. 17, 01.09.1997, p. 1948-1954.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Grubb, MR, Currier, BL, Stone, J, Warden, KE & An, KN 1997, 'Biomechanical evaluation of posterior cervical stabilization after a wide laminectomy', Spine, vol. 22, no. 17, pp. 1948-1954. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199709010-00002
Grubb, Mark R. ; Currier, Bradford L. ; Stone, Jim ; Warden, Karen E. ; An, Kai N. / Biomechanical evaluation of posterior cervical stabilization after a wide laminectomy. In: Spine. 1997 ; Vol. 22, No. 17. pp. 1948-1954.
@article{9c316d61bf2a4813a2bfd3f4e5888ade,
title = "Biomechanical evaluation of posterior cervical stabilization after a wide laminectomy",
abstract = "Study Design: In vitro biomechanical investigation with nondestructive and destructive testing in a human cadaverio model simulating wide postlaminectomy condition. Objectives. To determine the relative stability conferred by a posterior cervical spinal rod system and posterior cervical plating. Summary of Background Data. Posterior cervical plate fixation has been shown to be biomechanically superior to wiling techniques but lateral mass screws may injure neurovascular structures or facet joints if they are inserted improperly. A cervical rod system has been developed to enhance the safety of lateral mass instrumentation. Methods. The cervical spines of 12 cadavers under went biomechanical testing. After completion of the nondestructive intact testing; a wide laminectomy with subtotal facetectomies from C4 to C6 was performed. The specimens in two subgroups (group A, cervical spine rods with unicortical fixation, and group B reconstruction plates with bicortical fixation) were tested in flexion, lateral bending and torsion. Finally destructive testing inflexion was performed. Stiffness, neutral zone failure moment, energy to failure, and mechanism of failure were determined for each specimen. The data were analyzed using paired tests and ANOVA. Results. Group B had a greater mean screw, torque value. The instrumented constructs had a greater stiffness ratio (instrumented/intact) then the intact specimens in flexion, lateral bending, and torsional testing. Group A had a significantly greater flexural stiffness than Group B. Neutral zone ratio values were significantly lower during flexural testing for the cervical rod construct. Destructive testing resulted in significantly grater failure moment and energy to failure values for group A. In the cervical rod construct failure occurred primarily by superior screw loosening with pull- out from the lateral mass. Reconstruction plates consistently failed with fracture of the lateral mass and superior screw loosening. Conclusion. Significantly greater stability was noted in the cervical rod construct during nondestructive and destructive flexural testing.",
keywords = "Biomechanics, Cervical spine, Posterior instrumentation",
author = "Grubb, {Mark R.} and Currier, {Bradford L.} and Jim Stone and Warden, {Karen E.} and An, {Kai N.}",
year = "1997",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/00007632-199709010-00002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "1948--1954",
journal = "Spine",
issn = "0362-2436",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "17",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biomechanical evaluation of posterior cervical stabilization after a wide laminectomy

AU - Grubb, Mark R.

AU - Currier, Bradford L.

AU - Stone, Jim

AU - Warden, Karen E.

AU - An, Kai N.

PY - 1997/9/1

Y1 - 1997/9/1

N2 - Study Design: In vitro biomechanical investigation with nondestructive and destructive testing in a human cadaverio model simulating wide postlaminectomy condition. Objectives. To determine the relative stability conferred by a posterior cervical spinal rod system and posterior cervical plating. Summary of Background Data. Posterior cervical plate fixation has been shown to be biomechanically superior to wiling techniques but lateral mass screws may injure neurovascular structures or facet joints if they are inserted improperly. A cervical rod system has been developed to enhance the safety of lateral mass instrumentation. Methods. The cervical spines of 12 cadavers under went biomechanical testing. After completion of the nondestructive intact testing; a wide laminectomy with subtotal facetectomies from C4 to C6 was performed. The specimens in two subgroups (group A, cervical spine rods with unicortical fixation, and group B reconstruction plates with bicortical fixation) were tested in flexion, lateral bending and torsion. Finally destructive testing inflexion was performed. Stiffness, neutral zone failure moment, energy to failure, and mechanism of failure were determined for each specimen. The data were analyzed using paired tests and ANOVA. Results. Group B had a greater mean screw, torque value. The instrumented constructs had a greater stiffness ratio (instrumented/intact) then the intact specimens in flexion, lateral bending, and torsional testing. Group A had a significantly greater flexural stiffness than Group B. Neutral zone ratio values were significantly lower during flexural testing for the cervical rod construct. Destructive testing resulted in significantly grater failure moment and energy to failure values for group A. In the cervical rod construct failure occurred primarily by superior screw loosening with pull- out from the lateral mass. Reconstruction plates consistently failed with fracture of the lateral mass and superior screw loosening. Conclusion. Significantly greater stability was noted in the cervical rod construct during nondestructive and destructive flexural testing.

AB - Study Design: In vitro biomechanical investigation with nondestructive and destructive testing in a human cadaverio model simulating wide postlaminectomy condition. Objectives. To determine the relative stability conferred by a posterior cervical spinal rod system and posterior cervical plating. Summary of Background Data. Posterior cervical plate fixation has been shown to be biomechanically superior to wiling techniques but lateral mass screws may injure neurovascular structures or facet joints if they are inserted improperly. A cervical rod system has been developed to enhance the safety of lateral mass instrumentation. Methods. The cervical spines of 12 cadavers under went biomechanical testing. After completion of the nondestructive intact testing; a wide laminectomy with subtotal facetectomies from C4 to C6 was performed. The specimens in two subgroups (group A, cervical spine rods with unicortical fixation, and group B reconstruction plates with bicortical fixation) were tested in flexion, lateral bending and torsion. Finally destructive testing inflexion was performed. Stiffness, neutral zone failure moment, energy to failure, and mechanism of failure were determined for each specimen. The data were analyzed using paired tests and ANOVA. Results. Group B had a greater mean screw, torque value. The instrumented constructs had a greater stiffness ratio (instrumented/intact) then the intact specimens in flexion, lateral bending, and torsional testing. Group A had a significantly greater flexural stiffness than Group B. Neutral zone ratio values were significantly lower during flexural testing for the cervical rod construct. Destructive testing resulted in significantly grater failure moment and energy to failure values for group A. In the cervical rod construct failure occurred primarily by superior screw loosening with pull- out from the lateral mass. Reconstruction plates consistently failed with fracture of the lateral mass and superior screw loosening. Conclusion. Significantly greater stability was noted in the cervical rod construct during nondestructive and destructive flexural testing.

KW - Biomechanics

KW - Cervical spine

KW - Posterior instrumentation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031409653&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031409653&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00007632-199709010-00002

DO - 10.1097/00007632-199709010-00002

M3 - Article

C2 - 9306522

AN - SCOPUS:0031409653

VL - 22

SP - 1948

EP - 1954

JO - Spine

JF - Spine

SN - 0362-2436

IS - 17

ER -