Biomechanical evaluation of occipital fixation

P. J. Papagelopoulos, B. L. Currier, J. Stone, J. J. Grabowski, D. R. Larson, D. R. Fisher, K. N. An

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Many studies have shown a positive correlation among screw pullout strength, screw insertional torque, bone thickness, and areal bone mineral density (BMD) measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Variations are significant in the anatomy of the occipital bone. But no studies have correlated these variables with respect to the two locations commonly used for plate fixation to the occiput. The purpose of this study was to determine the thickness and quality of the occipital bone and to correlate these variables with the insertional torque of screws and the pullout strength of plates secured into two different locations on the occiput. The occiputs of 12 adult human fresh frozen cadaveric specimens were used. The specimens were analyzed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Direct thickness measurements of the occiput were performed. Areal and volumetric BMD were measured. A simple pelvic reconstruction plate (3.2 mm) was fixed to the occiput either laterally or at the midline with bicortical 4-mm cancellous screws. Torque was recorded at the time of insertion of each screw. Axial pullout tests were performed on all specimens. The peak load, failure load, stiffness, and energy to failure were recorded for each construct. Statistical analysis showed that the average thickness of occipital bone is greater in the midline than laterally. Occipital bone is thicker and screw torque is greater close to the inion. There is a positive correlation between bone thickness, areal BMD as measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, screw insertional torque, and strength of fixation. A plate fixed in the midline region of the occiput provides more rigid fixation than a plate fixed laterally. Areal BMD correlates better than volumetric BMD with bone thickness and is a reliable predictor of the strength of occipital fixation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)336-344
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Spinal Disorders
Volume13
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2000

Fingerprint

Occipital Bone
Torque
Bone Density
Photon Absorptiometry
Bone and Bones
Anatomy

Keywords

  • Biomechanics
  • Evaluation
  • Fixation
  • Fusion
  • Occiput

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Surgery

Cite this

Papagelopoulos, P. J., Currier, B. L., Stone, J., Grabowski, J. J., Larson, D. R., Fisher, D. R., & An, K. N. (2000). Biomechanical evaluation of occipital fixation. Journal of Spinal Disorders, 13(4), 336-344. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002517-200008000-00011

Biomechanical evaluation of occipital fixation. / Papagelopoulos, P. J.; Currier, B. L.; Stone, J.; Grabowski, J. J.; Larson, D. R.; Fisher, D. R.; An, K. N.

In: Journal of Spinal Disorders, Vol. 13, No. 4, 2000, p. 336-344.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Papagelopoulos, PJ, Currier, BL, Stone, J, Grabowski, JJ, Larson, DR, Fisher, DR & An, KN 2000, 'Biomechanical evaluation of occipital fixation', Journal of Spinal Disorders, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 336-344. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002517-200008000-00011
Papagelopoulos PJ, Currier BL, Stone J, Grabowski JJ, Larson DR, Fisher DR et al. Biomechanical evaluation of occipital fixation. Journal of Spinal Disorders. 2000;13(4):336-344. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002517-200008000-00011
Papagelopoulos, P. J. ; Currier, B. L. ; Stone, J. ; Grabowski, J. J. ; Larson, D. R. ; Fisher, D. R. ; An, K. N. / Biomechanical evaluation of occipital fixation. In: Journal of Spinal Disorders. 2000 ; Vol. 13, No. 4. pp. 336-344.
@article{c30f613f9b6043a5953532b3f921e55a,
title = "Biomechanical evaluation of occipital fixation",
abstract = "Many studies have shown a positive correlation among screw pullout strength, screw insertional torque, bone thickness, and areal bone mineral density (BMD) measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Variations are significant in the anatomy of the occipital bone. But no studies have correlated these variables with respect to the two locations commonly used for plate fixation to the occiput. The purpose of this study was to determine the thickness and quality of the occipital bone and to correlate these variables with the insertional torque of screws and the pullout strength of plates secured into two different locations on the occiput. The occiputs of 12 adult human fresh frozen cadaveric specimens were used. The specimens were analyzed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Direct thickness measurements of the occiput were performed. Areal and volumetric BMD were measured. A simple pelvic reconstruction plate (3.2 mm) was fixed to the occiput either laterally or at the midline with bicortical 4-mm cancellous screws. Torque was recorded at the time of insertion of each screw. Axial pullout tests were performed on all specimens. The peak load, failure load, stiffness, and energy to failure were recorded for each construct. Statistical analysis showed that the average thickness of occipital bone is greater in the midline than laterally. Occipital bone is thicker and screw torque is greater close to the inion. There is a positive correlation between bone thickness, areal BMD as measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, screw insertional torque, and strength of fixation. A plate fixed in the midline region of the occiput provides more rigid fixation than a plate fixed laterally. Areal BMD correlates better than volumetric BMD with bone thickness and is a reliable predictor of the strength of occipital fixation.",
keywords = "Biomechanics, Evaluation, Fixation, Fusion, Occiput",
author = "Papagelopoulos, {P. J.} and Currier, {B. L.} and J. Stone and Grabowski, {J. J.} and Larson, {D. R.} and Fisher, {D. R.} and An, {K. N.}",
year = "2000",
doi = "10.1097/00002517-200008000-00011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "336--344",
journal = "Journal of Spinal Disorders",
issn = "1536-0652",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biomechanical evaluation of occipital fixation

AU - Papagelopoulos, P. J.

AU - Currier, B. L.

AU - Stone, J.

AU - Grabowski, J. J.

AU - Larson, D. R.

AU - Fisher, D. R.

AU - An, K. N.

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - Many studies have shown a positive correlation among screw pullout strength, screw insertional torque, bone thickness, and areal bone mineral density (BMD) measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Variations are significant in the anatomy of the occipital bone. But no studies have correlated these variables with respect to the two locations commonly used for plate fixation to the occiput. The purpose of this study was to determine the thickness and quality of the occipital bone and to correlate these variables with the insertional torque of screws and the pullout strength of plates secured into two different locations on the occiput. The occiputs of 12 adult human fresh frozen cadaveric specimens were used. The specimens were analyzed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Direct thickness measurements of the occiput were performed. Areal and volumetric BMD were measured. A simple pelvic reconstruction plate (3.2 mm) was fixed to the occiput either laterally or at the midline with bicortical 4-mm cancellous screws. Torque was recorded at the time of insertion of each screw. Axial pullout tests were performed on all specimens. The peak load, failure load, stiffness, and energy to failure were recorded for each construct. Statistical analysis showed that the average thickness of occipital bone is greater in the midline than laterally. Occipital bone is thicker and screw torque is greater close to the inion. There is a positive correlation between bone thickness, areal BMD as measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, screw insertional torque, and strength of fixation. A plate fixed in the midline region of the occiput provides more rigid fixation than a plate fixed laterally. Areal BMD correlates better than volumetric BMD with bone thickness and is a reliable predictor of the strength of occipital fixation.

AB - Many studies have shown a positive correlation among screw pullout strength, screw insertional torque, bone thickness, and areal bone mineral density (BMD) measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Variations are significant in the anatomy of the occipital bone. But no studies have correlated these variables with respect to the two locations commonly used for plate fixation to the occiput. The purpose of this study was to determine the thickness and quality of the occipital bone and to correlate these variables with the insertional torque of screws and the pullout strength of plates secured into two different locations on the occiput. The occiputs of 12 adult human fresh frozen cadaveric specimens were used. The specimens were analyzed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Direct thickness measurements of the occiput were performed. Areal and volumetric BMD were measured. A simple pelvic reconstruction plate (3.2 mm) was fixed to the occiput either laterally or at the midline with bicortical 4-mm cancellous screws. Torque was recorded at the time of insertion of each screw. Axial pullout tests were performed on all specimens. The peak load, failure load, stiffness, and energy to failure were recorded for each construct. Statistical analysis showed that the average thickness of occipital bone is greater in the midline than laterally. Occipital bone is thicker and screw torque is greater close to the inion. There is a positive correlation between bone thickness, areal BMD as measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, screw insertional torque, and strength of fixation. A plate fixed in the midline region of the occiput provides more rigid fixation than a plate fixed laterally. Areal BMD correlates better than volumetric BMD with bone thickness and is a reliable predictor of the strength of occipital fixation.

KW - Biomechanics

KW - Evaluation

KW - Fixation

KW - Fusion

KW - Occiput

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034463791&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034463791&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00002517-200008000-00011

DO - 10.1097/00002517-200008000-00011

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 336

EP - 344

JO - Journal of Spinal Disorders

JF - Journal of Spinal Disorders

SN - 1536-0652

IS - 4

ER -