Biomechanical evaluation of a new fixation device for the thoracic spine

Michio Hongo, Brice Ilharreborde, Ralph Gay, Chunfeng D Zhao, Kristin D Zhao, Lawrence J. Berglund, Mark Zobitz, Kai Nan An

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The technology used in surgery for spinal deformity has progressed rapidly in recent years. Commonly used fixation techniques may include monofilament wires, sublaminar wires and cables, and pedicle screws. Unfortunately, neurological complications can occur with all of these, compromising the patients' health and quality of life. Recently, an alternative fixation technique using a metal clamp and polyester belt was developed to replace hooks and sublaminar wiring in scoliosis surgery. The goal of this study was to compare the pull-out strength of this new construct with sublaminar wiring, laminar hooks and pedicle screws. Forty thoracic vertebrae from five fresh frozen human thoracic spines (T5-12) were divided into five groups (8 per group), such that BMD values, pedicle diameter, and vertebral levels were equally distributed. They were then potted in polymethylmethacrylate and anchored with metal screws and polyethylene bands. One of five fixation methods was applied to the right side of the vertebra in each group: Pedicle screw, sublaminar belt with clamp, figure-8 belt with clamp, sublaminar wire, or laminar hook. Pull-out strength was then assessed using a custom jig in a servohydraulic tester. The mean failure load of the pedicle screw group was significantly larger than that of the figure-8 clamp (P = 0.001), sublaminar belt (0.0172), and sublaminar wire groups (P = 0.04) with no significant difference in pull-out strength between the latter three constructs. The most common mode of failure was the fracture of the pedicle. BMD was significantly correlated with failure load only in the figure-8 clamp and pedicle screw constructs. Only the pedicle screw had a statistically significant higher failure load than the sublaminar clamp. The sublaminar method of applying the belt and clamp device was superior to the figure-8 method. The sublaminar belt and clamp construct compared favorably to the traditional methods of sublaminar wires and laminar hooks, and should be considered as an alternative fixation device in the thoracic spine.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1213-1219
Number of pages7
JournalEuropean Spine Journal
Volume18
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2009

Fingerprint

Spine
Thorax
Equipment and Supplies
Metals
Thoracic Vertebrae
Polyesters
Scoliosis
Polyethylene
Polymethyl Methacrylate
Pedicle Screws
Quality of Life
Technology
Health

Keywords

  • Biomechanics
  • Orthopedic fixation devices
  • Scoliosis
  • Thoracic vertebrae

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Biomechanical evaluation of a new fixation device for the thoracic spine. / Hongo, Michio; Ilharreborde, Brice; Gay, Ralph; Zhao, Chunfeng D; Zhao, Kristin D; Berglund, Lawrence J.; Zobitz, Mark; An, Kai Nan.

In: European Spine Journal, Vol. 18, No. 8, 08.2009, p. 1213-1219.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hongo, Michio ; Ilharreborde, Brice ; Gay, Ralph ; Zhao, Chunfeng D ; Zhao, Kristin D ; Berglund, Lawrence J. ; Zobitz, Mark ; An, Kai Nan. / Biomechanical evaluation of a new fixation device for the thoracic spine. In: European Spine Journal. 2009 ; Vol. 18, No. 8. pp. 1213-1219.
@article{9f2424761da9467d97056905c0f3991b,
title = "Biomechanical evaluation of a new fixation device for the thoracic spine",
abstract = "The technology used in surgery for spinal deformity has progressed rapidly in recent years. Commonly used fixation techniques may include monofilament wires, sublaminar wires and cables, and pedicle screws. Unfortunately, neurological complications can occur with all of these, compromising the patients' health and quality of life. Recently, an alternative fixation technique using a metal clamp and polyester belt was developed to replace hooks and sublaminar wiring in scoliosis surgery. The goal of this study was to compare the pull-out strength of this new construct with sublaminar wiring, laminar hooks and pedicle screws. Forty thoracic vertebrae from five fresh frozen human thoracic spines (T5-12) were divided into five groups (8 per group), such that BMD values, pedicle diameter, and vertebral levels were equally distributed. They were then potted in polymethylmethacrylate and anchored with metal screws and polyethylene bands. One of five fixation methods was applied to the right side of the vertebra in each group: Pedicle screw, sublaminar belt with clamp, figure-8 belt with clamp, sublaminar wire, or laminar hook. Pull-out strength was then assessed using a custom jig in a servohydraulic tester. The mean failure load of the pedicle screw group was significantly larger than that of the figure-8 clamp (P = 0.001), sublaminar belt (0.0172), and sublaminar wire groups (P = 0.04) with no significant difference in pull-out strength between the latter three constructs. The most common mode of failure was the fracture of the pedicle. BMD was significantly correlated with failure load only in the figure-8 clamp and pedicle screw constructs. Only the pedicle screw had a statistically significant higher failure load than the sublaminar clamp. The sublaminar method of applying the belt and clamp device was superior to the figure-8 method. The sublaminar belt and clamp construct compared favorably to the traditional methods of sublaminar wires and laminar hooks, and should be considered as an alternative fixation device in the thoracic spine.",
keywords = "Biomechanics, Orthopedic fixation devices, Scoliosis, Thoracic vertebrae",
author = "Michio Hongo and Brice Ilharreborde and Ralph Gay and Zhao, {Chunfeng D} and Zhao, {Kristin D} and Berglund, {Lawrence J.} and Mark Zobitz and An, {Kai Nan}",
year = "2009",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1007/s00586-009-0999-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "1213--1219",
journal = "European Spine Journal",
issn = "0940-6719",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biomechanical evaluation of a new fixation device for the thoracic spine

AU - Hongo, Michio

AU - Ilharreborde, Brice

AU - Gay, Ralph

AU - Zhao, Chunfeng D

AU - Zhao, Kristin D

AU - Berglund, Lawrence J.

AU - Zobitz, Mark

AU - An, Kai Nan

PY - 2009/8

Y1 - 2009/8

N2 - The technology used in surgery for spinal deformity has progressed rapidly in recent years. Commonly used fixation techniques may include monofilament wires, sublaminar wires and cables, and pedicle screws. Unfortunately, neurological complications can occur with all of these, compromising the patients' health and quality of life. Recently, an alternative fixation technique using a metal clamp and polyester belt was developed to replace hooks and sublaminar wiring in scoliosis surgery. The goal of this study was to compare the pull-out strength of this new construct with sublaminar wiring, laminar hooks and pedicle screws. Forty thoracic vertebrae from five fresh frozen human thoracic spines (T5-12) were divided into five groups (8 per group), such that BMD values, pedicle diameter, and vertebral levels were equally distributed. They were then potted in polymethylmethacrylate and anchored with metal screws and polyethylene bands. One of five fixation methods was applied to the right side of the vertebra in each group: Pedicle screw, sublaminar belt with clamp, figure-8 belt with clamp, sublaminar wire, or laminar hook. Pull-out strength was then assessed using a custom jig in a servohydraulic tester. The mean failure load of the pedicle screw group was significantly larger than that of the figure-8 clamp (P = 0.001), sublaminar belt (0.0172), and sublaminar wire groups (P = 0.04) with no significant difference in pull-out strength between the latter three constructs. The most common mode of failure was the fracture of the pedicle. BMD was significantly correlated with failure load only in the figure-8 clamp and pedicle screw constructs. Only the pedicle screw had a statistically significant higher failure load than the sublaminar clamp. The sublaminar method of applying the belt and clamp device was superior to the figure-8 method. The sublaminar belt and clamp construct compared favorably to the traditional methods of sublaminar wires and laminar hooks, and should be considered as an alternative fixation device in the thoracic spine.

AB - The technology used in surgery for spinal deformity has progressed rapidly in recent years. Commonly used fixation techniques may include monofilament wires, sublaminar wires and cables, and pedicle screws. Unfortunately, neurological complications can occur with all of these, compromising the patients' health and quality of life. Recently, an alternative fixation technique using a metal clamp and polyester belt was developed to replace hooks and sublaminar wiring in scoliosis surgery. The goal of this study was to compare the pull-out strength of this new construct with sublaminar wiring, laminar hooks and pedicle screws. Forty thoracic vertebrae from five fresh frozen human thoracic spines (T5-12) were divided into five groups (8 per group), such that BMD values, pedicle diameter, and vertebral levels were equally distributed. They were then potted in polymethylmethacrylate and anchored with metal screws and polyethylene bands. One of five fixation methods was applied to the right side of the vertebra in each group: Pedicle screw, sublaminar belt with clamp, figure-8 belt with clamp, sublaminar wire, or laminar hook. Pull-out strength was then assessed using a custom jig in a servohydraulic tester. The mean failure load of the pedicle screw group was significantly larger than that of the figure-8 clamp (P = 0.001), sublaminar belt (0.0172), and sublaminar wire groups (P = 0.04) with no significant difference in pull-out strength between the latter three constructs. The most common mode of failure was the fracture of the pedicle. BMD was significantly correlated with failure load only in the figure-8 clamp and pedicle screw constructs. Only the pedicle screw had a statistically significant higher failure load than the sublaminar clamp. The sublaminar method of applying the belt and clamp device was superior to the figure-8 method. The sublaminar belt and clamp construct compared favorably to the traditional methods of sublaminar wires and laminar hooks, and should be considered as an alternative fixation device in the thoracic spine.

KW - Biomechanics

KW - Orthopedic fixation devices

KW - Scoliosis

KW - Thoracic vertebrae

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=69549129421&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=69549129421&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00586-009-0999-4

DO - 10.1007/s00586-009-0999-4

M3 - Article

C2 - 19404687

AN - SCOPUS:69549129421

VL - 18

SP - 1213

EP - 1219

JO - European Spine Journal

JF - European Spine Journal

SN - 0940-6719

IS - 8

ER -