Bias of allele-sharing linkage statistics in the presence of intermarker linkage disequilibrium

Ellen L Goode, Michael D. Badzioch, Gail P. Jarvik

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Current genome-wide linkage-mapping single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) panels with densities of 0.3 cM are likely to have increased intermarker linkage disequilibrium (LD) compared to 5-cM microsatellite panels. The resulting difference in haplotype frequencies versus that predicted may affect multipoint linkage analysis with ungenotyped founders; a common haplotype may be assumed to be rare, leading to inflation of identical-by-descent (IBD) allele-sharing estimates and evidence for linkage. Using data simulated for the Genetic Analysis Workshop 14, we assessed bias in allele-sharing measures and nonparametric linkage (NPLall) and Kong and Cox LOD (KC-LOD) scores in a targeted analysis of regions with and without LD and with and without genes. Using over 100 replicates, we found that if founders were not genotyped, multipoint IBD estimates and δ parameters were modestly inflated and NPLall and KC-LOD scores were biased upwards in the region with LD and no gene; rather than centering on the null, the mean NPLall and KC-LOD scores were 0.51 ± 0.91 and 0.19 ± 0.38, respectively. Reduction of LD by dropping markers reduced this upward bias. These trends were not seen in the non-LD region with no gene. In regions with genes (with and without LD), a slight loss in power with dropping markers was suggested. These results indicate that LD should be considered in dense scans; removal of markers in LD may reduce false-positive results although information may also be lost. Methods to address LD in a high-throughput manner are needed for efficient, robust genomic scans with dense SNPs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numberS82
JournalBMC Genetics
Volume6
Issue numberSUPPL.1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 30 2005

Fingerprint

Linkage Disequilibrium
Alleles
Haplotypes
Genes
Single Nucleotide Polymorphism
Chromosome Mapping
Economic Inflation
Microsatellite Repeats
Genome
Education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics
  • Genetics(clinical)

Cite this

Bias of allele-sharing linkage statistics in the presence of intermarker linkage disequilibrium. / Goode, Ellen L; Badzioch, Michael D.; Jarvik, Gail P.

In: BMC Genetics, Vol. 6, No. SUPPL.1, S82, 30.12.2005.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8aecb9b9393246ca86f0fcd43d6981ac,
title = "Bias of allele-sharing linkage statistics in the presence of intermarker linkage disequilibrium",
abstract = "Current genome-wide linkage-mapping single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) panels with densities of 0.3 cM are likely to have increased intermarker linkage disequilibrium (LD) compared to 5-cM microsatellite panels. The resulting difference in haplotype frequencies versus that predicted may affect multipoint linkage analysis with ungenotyped founders; a common haplotype may be assumed to be rare, leading to inflation of identical-by-descent (IBD) allele-sharing estimates and evidence for linkage. Using data simulated for the Genetic Analysis Workshop 14, we assessed bias in allele-sharing measures and nonparametric linkage (NPLall) and Kong and Cox LOD (KC-LOD) scores in a targeted analysis of regions with and without LD and with and without genes. Using over 100 replicates, we found that if founders were not genotyped, multipoint IBD estimates and δ parameters were modestly inflated and NPLall and KC-LOD scores were biased upwards in the region with LD and no gene; rather than centering on the null, the mean NPLall and KC-LOD scores were 0.51 ± 0.91 and 0.19 ± 0.38, respectively. Reduction of LD by dropping markers reduced this upward bias. These trends were not seen in the non-LD region with no gene. In regions with genes (with and without LD), a slight loss in power with dropping markers was suggested. These results indicate that LD should be considered in dense scans; removal of markers in LD may reduce false-positive results although information may also be lost. Methods to address LD in a high-throughput manner are needed for efficient, robust genomic scans with dense SNPs.",
author = "Goode, {Ellen L} and Badzioch, {Michael D.} and Jarvik, {Gail P.}",
year = "2005",
month = "12",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1186/1471-2156-6-S1-S82",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
journal = "BMC Genetics",
issn = "1471-2156",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "SUPPL.1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bias of allele-sharing linkage statistics in the presence of intermarker linkage disequilibrium

AU - Goode, Ellen L

AU - Badzioch, Michael D.

AU - Jarvik, Gail P.

PY - 2005/12/30

Y1 - 2005/12/30

N2 - Current genome-wide linkage-mapping single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) panels with densities of 0.3 cM are likely to have increased intermarker linkage disequilibrium (LD) compared to 5-cM microsatellite panels. The resulting difference in haplotype frequencies versus that predicted may affect multipoint linkage analysis with ungenotyped founders; a common haplotype may be assumed to be rare, leading to inflation of identical-by-descent (IBD) allele-sharing estimates and evidence for linkage. Using data simulated for the Genetic Analysis Workshop 14, we assessed bias in allele-sharing measures and nonparametric linkage (NPLall) and Kong and Cox LOD (KC-LOD) scores in a targeted analysis of regions with and without LD and with and without genes. Using over 100 replicates, we found that if founders were not genotyped, multipoint IBD estimates and δ parameters were modestly inflated and NPLall and KC-LOD scores were biased upwards in the region with LD and no gene; rather than centering on the null, the mean NPLall and KC-LOD scores were 0.51 ± 0.91 and 0.19 ± 0.38, respectively. Reduction of LD by dropping markers reduced this upward bias. These trends were not seen in the non-LD region with no gene. In regions with genes (with and without LD), a slight loss in power with dropping markers was suggested. These results indicate that LD should be considered in dense scans; removal of markers in LD may reduce false-positive results although information may also be lost. Methods to address LD in a high-throughput manner are needed for efficient, robust genomic scans with dense SNPs.

AB - Current genome-wide linkage-mapping single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) panels with densities of 0.3 cM are likely to have increased intermarker linkage disequilibrium (LD) compared to 5-cM microsatellite panels. The resulting difference in haplotype frequencies versus that predicted may affect multipoint linkage analysis with ungenotyped founders; a common haplotype may be assumed to be rare, leading to inflation of identical-by-descent (IBD) allele-sharing estimates and evidence for linkage. Using data simulated for the Genetic Analysis Workshop 14, we assessed bias in allele-sharing measures and nonparametric linkage (NPLall) and Kong and Cox LOD (KC-LOD) scores in a targeted analysis of regions with and without LD and with and without genes. Using over 100 replicates, we found that if founders were not genotyped, multipoint IBD estimates and δ parameters were modestly inflated and NPLall and KC-LOD scores were biased upwards in the region with LD and no gene; rather than centering on the null, the mean NPLall and KC-LOD scores were 0.51 ± 0.91 and 0.19 ± 0.38, respectively. Reduction of LD by dropping markers reduced this upward bias. These trends were not seen in the non-LD region with no gene. In regions with genes (with and without LD), a slight loss in power with dropping markers was suggested. These results indicate that LD should be considered in dense scans; removal of markers in LD may reduce false-positive results although information may also be lost. Methods to address LD in a high-throughput manner are needed for efficient, robust genomic scans with dense SNPs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=30344443251&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=30344443251&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1471-2156-6-S1-S82

DO - 10.1186/1471-2156-6-S1-S82

M3 - Article

C2 - 16451697

AN - SCOPUS:30344443251

VL - 6

JO - BMC Genetics

JF - BMC Genetics

SN - 1471-2156

IS - SUPPL.1

M1 - S82

ER -