Beta-cell function and insulin resistance evaluated by HOMA in pancreatic cancer subjects with varying degrees of glucose intolerance

Suresh T. Chari, Mauricio Zapiach, Dhiraj Yadav, Robert A. Rizza

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

46 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background/Aims: To gain insights into pathogenesis of pancreatic cancer-associated diabetes. Methods: Using homeostasis model assessment (HOMA), we estimated β-cell function (BCF) and insulin resistance (IR) from fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and insulin in 67 normoglycemic controls and 62 age- and BMI-matched normoglycemic pancreatic cancer patients. In addition, we studied 73 pancreatic cancer subjects with glucose intolerance; 21 had impaired FPG and 51 had diabetes. Results: BCF was similar in controls and normoglycemic pancreatic cancer subjects (64 ± 5 vs. 78 ± 9, p = ns), while IR was higher in pancreatic cancer subjects with normal FPG (1.6 ± 0.6 vs. 1.1 ± 0.1, p = 0.002). Among pancreatic cancer subjects, those with impaired FPG had markedly decreased BCF compared to those with normal FPG (44 ± 5 vs. 78 ± 9, p < 0.02) without significant difference in IR (1.9 ± 0.2 vs. 1.6 ± 0.6, p = ns). In cancer subjects, those with diabetes had markedly increased IR compared to those with impaired FPG (3.2 ± 0.3 vs. 1.9 ± 0.2, p < 0.0001), while the BCF was similar (37 ± 4 vs. 44 ± 5). Conclusion: Diabetes associated with pancreatic cancer is likely due to a combination of marked decline in BCF and increased insulin resistance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)229-233
Number of pages5
JournalPancreatology
Volume5
Issue number2-3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2005

Keywords

  • Diabetes
  • Homeostasis model assessment
  • Insulin resistance
  • Pancreatic cancer
  • β-Cell function

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Hepatology
  • Gastroenterology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Beta-cell function and insulin resistance evaluated by HOMA in pancreatic cancer subjects with varying degrees of glucose intolerance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this