Best method in clinical practice and in research studies to determine left atrial size

Steven Jay Lester, Elizabeth W. Ryan, Nelson B. Schiller, Elyse Foster

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

408 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although the anteroposterior dimension of the left atrium is universally used in clinical practice and research, we hypothesized that it may be an inaccurate surrogate for volume because its use is based on the unlikely assumption that there is a constant relation among atrial dimensions. The following measurements of the left atrium were made at end ventricular systole: (1) M-mode-derived anteroposterior linear dimension from the parasternal long-axis view; (2) digitized planimetry of the left atrial (LA) cavity from the apical 4-chamber view; and (3) digitized planimetry of the LA cavity from the apical 2-chamber view. The following volume calculations were obtained from these digital measurements: (1) volume derived from the M-mode dimension assuming a spherical shape; (2) volume derived from the single plane area-length of apical 4-chamber view, which assumes that LA geometry can be generalized from a single 2-dimensional plane; and (3) volume derived from the biplane method of discs. The correlation coefficient between the M-mode and biplane methods of determining LA volume was r = 0.76. The mean difference (±2 SDs) between these methods is -25 ± 33 ml. The correlation coefficient between the single plane apical 4-chamber and biplane methods of determining LA volume is r = 0.97. The mean difference (±2 SDs) between these methods was -5.0 ± 12 ml, indicating good agreement. The M-mode measure of the left atrium is an inaccurate representation of its size. Two-dimensional-derived LA volumes provide a more accurate measure of the true size of the left atrium and are more sensitive to changes in LA size. When an echocardiographic measure of LA size is made either in an individual patient or as a variable in a research study, the M-mode measure should be avoided.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)829-832
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Cardiology
Volume84
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Heart Atria
Research
Systole

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Best method in clinical practice and in research studies to determine left atrial size. / Lester, Steven Jay; Ryan, Elizabeth W.; Schiller, Nelson B.; Foster, Elyse.

In: American Journal of Cardiology, Vol. 84, No. 7, 01.10.1999, p. 829-832.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lester, Steven Jay ; Ryan, Elizabeth W. ; Schiller, Nelson B. ; Foster, Elyse. / Best method in clinical practice and in research studies to determine left atrial size. In: American Journal of Cardiology. 1999 ; Vol. 84, No. 7. pp. 829-832.
@article{385c836524574926a4fd008325d40235,
title = "Best method in clinical practice and in research studies to determine left atrial size",
abstract = "Although the anteroposterior dimension of the left atrium is universally used in clinical practice and research, we hypothesized that it may be an inaccurate surrogate for volume because its use is based on the unlikely assumption that there is a constant relation among atrial dimensions. The following measurements of the left atrium were made at end ventricular systole: (1) M-mode-derived anteroposterior linear dimension from the parasternal long-axis view; (2) digitized planimetry of the left atrial (LA) cavity from the apical 4-chamber view; and (3) digitized planimetry of the LA cavity from the apical 2-chamber view. The following volume calculations were obtained from these digital measurements: (1) volume derived from the M-mode dimension assuming a spherical shape; (2) volume derived from the single plane area-length of apical 4-chamber view, which assumes that LA geometry can be generalized from a single 2-dimensional plane; and (3) volume derived from the biplane method of discs. The correlation coefficient between the M-mode and biplane methods of determining LA volume was r = 0.76. The mean difference (±2 SDs) between these methods is -25 ± 33 ml. The correlation coefficient between the single plane apical 4-chamber and biplane methods of determining LA volume is r = 0.97. The mean difference (±2 SDs) between these methods was -5.0 ± 12 ml, indicating good agreement. The M-mode measure of the left atrium is an inaccurate representation of its size. Two-dimensional-derived LA volumes provide a more accurate measure of the true size of the left atrium and are more sensitive to changes in LA size. When an echocardiographic measure of LA size is made either in an individual patient or as a variable in a research study, the M-mode measure should be avoided.",
author = "Lester, {Steven Jay} and Ryan, {Elizabeth W.} and Schiller, {Nelson B.} and Elyse Foster",
year = "1999",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0002-9149(99)00446-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "84",
pages = "829--832",
journal = "American Journal of Cardiology",
issn = "0002-9149",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Best method in clinical practice and in research studies to determine left atrial size

AU - Lester, Steven Jay

AU - Ryan, Elizabeth W.

AU - Schiller, Nelson B.

AU - Foster, Elyse

PY - 1999/10/1

Y1 - 1999/10/1

N2 - Although the anteroposterior dimension of the left atrium is universally used in clinical practice and research, we hypothesized that it may be an inaccurate surrogate for volume because its use is based on the unlikely assumption that there is a constant relation among atrial dimensions. The following measurements of the left atrium were made at end ventricular systole: (1) M-mode-derived anteroposterior linear dimension from the parasternal long-axis view; (2) digitized planimetry of the left atrial (LA) cavity from the apical 4-chamber view; and (3) digitized planimetry of the LA cavity from the apical 2-chamber view. The following volume calculations were obtained from these digital measurements: (1) volume derived from the M-mode dimension assuming a spherical shape; (2) volume derived from the single plane area-length of apical 4-chamber view, which assumes that LA geometry can be generalized from a single 2-dimensional plane; and (3) volume derived from the biplane method of discs. The correlation coefficient between the M-mode and biplane methods of determining LA volume was r = 0.76. The mean difference (±2 SDs) between these methods is -25 ± 33 ml. The correlation coefficient between the single plane apical 4-chamber and biplane methods of determining LA volume is r = 0.97. The mean difference (±2 SDs) between these methods was -5.0 ± 12 ml, indicating good agreement. The M-mode measure of the left atrium is an inaccurate representation of its size. Two-dimensional-derived LA volumes provide a more accurate measure of the true size of the left atrium and are more sensitive to changes in LA size. When an echocardiographic measure of LA size is made either in an individual patient or as a variable in a research study, the M-mode measure should be avoided.

AB - Although the anteroposterior dimension of the left atrium is universally used in clinical practice and research, we hypothesized that it may be an inaccurate surrogate for volume because its use is based on the unlikely assumption that there is a constant relation among atrial dimensions. The following measurements of the left atrium were made at end ventricular systole: (1) M-mode-derived anteroposterior linear dimension from the parasternal long-axis view; (2) digitized planimetry of the left atrial (LA) cavity from the apical 4-chamber view; and (3) digitized planimetry of the LA cavity from the apical 2-chamber view. The following volume calculations were obtained from these digital measurements: (1) volume derived from the M-mode dimension assuming a spherical shape; (2) volume derived from the single plane area-length of apical 4-chamber view, which assumes that LA geometry can be generalized from a single 2-dimensional plane; and (3) volume derived from the biplane method of discs. The correlation coefficient between the M-mode and biplane methods of determining LA volume was r = 0.76. The mean difference (±2 SDs) between these methods is -25 ± 33 ml. The correlation coefficient between the single plane apical 4-chamber and biplane methods of determining LA volume is r = 0.97. The mean difference (±2 SDs) between these methods was -5.0 ± 12 ml, indicating good agreement. The M-mode measure of the left atrium is an inaccurate representation of its size. Two-dimensional-derived LA volumes provide a more accurate measure of the true size of the left atrium and are more sensitive to changes in LA size. When an echocardiographic measure of LA size is made either in an individual patient or as a variable in a research study, the M-mode measure should be avoided.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032886220&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032886220&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0002-9149(99)00446-4

DO - 10.1016/S0002-9149(99)00446-4

M3 - Article

C2 - 10513783

AN - SCOPUS:0032886220

VL - 84

SP - 829

EP - 832

JO - American Journal of Cardiology

JF - American Journal of Cardiology

SN - 0002-9149

IS - 7

ER -