Benefits of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for colon polyps: A case- matched series

T. M. Young-Fadok, E. Radice, Heidi Nelson, W. S. Harmsen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

62 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To clarify the true benefits of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy by comparing clinical outcomes from a series of laparoscopic right colectomies with matched open colectomies, all performed for the singular indication of polyp not amenable to colonoscopic removal. Patients and Methods: A retrospective case-matched study was performed of consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic-assisted right hemicolectomy for polyps between January 1992 and July 1997. Each case was matched to a control undergoing the equivalent open procedure for the same indication during the same time period. Results: Thirty-eight patients undergoing laparoscopic- assisted right hemicolectomy for polyps were identified, and matches were found. The conversion rate was 18.4% (7/38), 21.4% early in the series and 10% in later experience. Operative times were longer for laparoscopic- associated colectomy (median, 208 minutes vs 150 minutes, P<.001). Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy resulted in shorter postoperative ileus (time to flatus, 3.0 vs 4.0 days, P<.001; time to bowel movement, 3.5 vs 5.0 days, P<.001) and in earlier tolerance of regular diet (3.5 vs 6.0 days, P<.001). Fewer days of narcotic administration were required by the laparoscopic group (3.0 vs 4.5 days, P<.001). This resulted in a significantly shorter length of hospital stay (4.0 vs 7.0 days, P<.001). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications. Conclusions: Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy has significant patient benefits. These benefits are apparent when procedures of equal complexity and equivalent indications are compared. Laparoscopic-assisted resection has become our preferred approach for polyps not amenable to colonoscopic polypectomy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)344-348
Number of pages5
JournalMayo Clinic Proceedings
Volume75
Issue number4
StatePublished - 2000

Fingerprint

Colectomy
Polyps
Colon
Length of Stay
Flatulence
Ileus
Narcotics
Operative Time
Diet
Incidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Benefits of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for colon polyps : A case- matched series. / Young-Fadok, T. M.; Radice, E.; Nelson, Heidi; Harmsen, W. S.

In: Mayo Clinic Proceedings, Vol. 75, No. 4, 2000, p. 344-348.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Young-Fadok, TM, Radice, E, Nelson, H & Harmsen, WS 2000, 'Benefits of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for colon polyps: A case- matched series', Mayo Clinic Proceedings, vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 344-348.
Young-Fadok, T. M. ; Radice, E. ; Nelson, Heidi ; Harmsen, W. S. / Benefits of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for colon polyps : A case- matched series. In: Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2000 ; Vol. 75, No. 4. pp. 344-348.
@article{59bb06e56e824bbfb9bb3856e6360b27,
title = "Benefits of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for colon polyps: A case- matched series",
abstract = "Objective: To clarify the true benefits of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy by comparing clinical outcomes from a series of laparoscopic right colectomies with matched open colectomies, all performed for the singular indication of polyp not amenable to colonoscopic removal. Patients and Methods: A retrospective case-matched study was performed of consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic-assisted right hemicolectomy for polyps between January 1992 and July 1997. Each case was matched to a control undergoing the equivalent open procedure for the same indication during the same time period. Results: Thirty-eight patients undergoing laparoscopic- assisted right hemicolectomy for polyps were identified, and matches were found. The conversion rate was 18.4{\%} (7/38), 21.4{\%} early in the series and 10{\%} in later experience. Operative times were longer for laparoscopic- associated colectomy (median, 208 minutes vs 150 minutes, P<.001). Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy resulted in shorter postoperative ileus (time to flatus, 3.0 vs 4.0 days, P<.001; time to bowel movement, 3.5 vs 5.0 days, P<.001) and in earlier tolerance of regular diet (3.5 vs 6.0 days, P<.001). Fewer days of narcotic administration were required by the laparoscopic group (3.0 vs 4.5 days, P<.001). This resulted in a significantly shorter length of hospital stay (4.0 vs 7.0 days, P<.001). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications. Conclusions: Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy has significant patient benefits. These benefits are apparent when procedures of equal complexity and equivalent indications are compared. Laparoscopic-assisted resection has become our preferred approach for polyps not amenable to colonoscopic polypectomy.",
author = "Young-Fadok, {T. M.} and E. Radice and Heidi Nelson and Harmsen, {W. S.}",
year = "2000",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "75",
pages = "344--348",
journal = "Mayo Clinic Proceedings",
issn = "0025-6196",
publisher = "Elsevier Science",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Benefits of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for colon polyps

T2 - A case- matched series

AU - Young-Fadok, T. M.

AU - Radice, E.

AU - Nelson, Heidi

AU - Harmsen, W. S.

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - Objective: To clarify the true benefits of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy by comparing clinical outcomes from a series of laparoscopic right colectomies with matched open colectomies, all performed for the singular indication of polyp not amenable to colonoscopic removal. Patients and Methods: A retrospective case-matched study was performed of consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic-assisted right hemicolectomy for polyps between January 1992 and July 1997. Each case was matched to a control undergoing the equivalent open procedure for the same indication during the same time period. Results: Thirty-eight patients undergoing laparoscopic- assisted right hemicolectomy for polyps were identified, and matches were found. The conversion rate was 18.4% (7/38), 21.4% early in the series and 10% in later experience. Operative times were longer for laparoscopic- associated colectomy (median, 208 minutes vs 150 minutes, P<.001). Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy resulted in shorter postoperative ileus (time to flatus, 3.0 vs 4.0 days, P<.001; time to bowel movement, 3.5 vs 5.0 days, P<.001) and in earlier tolerance of regular diet (3.5 vs 6.0 days, P<.001). Fewer days of narcotic administration were required by the laparoscopic group (3.0 vs 4.5 days, P<.001). This resulted in a significantly shorter length of hospital stay (4.0 vs 7.0 days, P<.001). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications. Conclusions: Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy has significant patient benefits. These benefits are apparent when procedures of equal complexity and equivalent indications are compared. Laparoscopic-assisted resection has become our preferred approach for polyps not amenable to colonoscopic polypectomy.

AB - Objective: To clarify the true benefits of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy by comparing clinical outcomes from a series of laparoscopic right colectomies with matched open colectomies, all performed for the singular indication of polyp not amenable to colonoscopic removal. Patients and Methods: A retrospective case-matched study was performed of consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic-assisted right hemicolectomy for polyps between January 1992 and July 1997. Each case was matched to a control undergoing the equivalent open procedure for the same indication during the same time period. Results: Thirty-eight patients undergoing laparoscopic- assisted right hemicolectomy for polyps were identified, and matches were found. The conversion rate was 18.4% (7/38), 21.4% early in the series and 10% in later experience. Operative times were longer for laparoscopic- associated colectomy (median, 208 minutes vs 150 minutes, P<.001). Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy resulted in shorter postoperative ileus (time to flatus, 3.0 vs 4.0 days, P<.001; time to bowel movement, 3.5 vs 5.0 days, P<.001) and in earlier tolerance of regular diet (3.5 vs 6.0 days, P<.001). Fewer days of narcotic administration were required by the laparoscopic group (3.0 vs 4.5 days, P<.001). This resulted in a significantly shorter length of hospital stay (4.0 vs 7.0 days, P<.001). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications. Conclusions: Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy has significant patient benefits. These benefits are apparent when procedures of equal complexity and equivalent indications are compared. Laparoscopic-assisted resection has become our preferred approach for polyps not amenable to colonoscopic polypectomy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034086031&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034086031&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10761487

AN - SCOPUS:0034086031

VL - 75

SP - 344

EP - 348

JO - Mayo Clinic Proceedings

JF - Mayo Clinic Proceedings

SN - 0025-6196

IS - 4

ER -