Benefits and safety of CT fluoroscopy in interventional radiologic procedures

Stephanie K Carlson, C. E. Bender, K. L. Classic, F. E. Zink, J. P. Quam, E. M. Ward, Ann L Oberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

135 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the benefits and safety of computed tomographic (CT) fluoroscopy when compared with conventional CT for the guidance of interventional radiologic procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data on 203 consecutive percutaneous interventional procedures performed with use of CT fluoroscopic guidance and 99 consecutive procedures with conventional CT guidance were obtained from a questionnaire completed by the radiologists and CT technologists who performed the procedures. The questionnaire specifically addressed radiation dose measurements to patients and personnel, total procedure time, total CT fluoroscopy time, mode of CT fluoroscopic guidance (continuous versus intermittent), success of procedure, major complications, type of procedure (biopsy, aspiration, or drainage), site of procedure, and level of operator experience. RESULTS: The median calculated patient absorbed dose per procedure and the median procedure time with CT fluoroscopy were 94% less and 32% less, respectively, than those measurements with conventional CT scanning (P < .05). An intermittent mode of image acquisition was used in 97% of the 203 cases. This resulted in personnel radiation dosimetric readings below measurable levels in all cases. CONCLUSION: As implemented at the authors' institution, use of CT fluoroscopy for the guidance of interventional radiologic procedures markedly decreased patient radiation dose and total procedure time compared with use of conventional CT guidance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)515-520
Number of pages6
JournalRadiology
Volume219
Issue number2
StatePublished - 2001

Fingerprint

Fluoroscopy
Safety
Radiation
Needle Biopsy
Reading
Drainage

Keywords

  • **.12115
  • **.12115
  • **.12119 Computed tomography (CT)
  • **.12119 Interventional procedures
  • **.1261
  • **.1262
  • **.1263
  • Comparative studies
  • Computed tomography (CT)
  • Guidance
  • Radiation exposure Computed tomography (CT)
  • Technology
  • Utilization Fluoroscopy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Carlson, S. K., Bender, C. E., Classic, K. L., Zink, F. E., Quam, J. P., Ward, E. M., & Oberg, A. L. (2001). Benefits and safety of CT fluoroscopy in interventional radiologic procedures. Radiology, 219(2), 515-520.

Benefits and safety of CT fluoroscopy in interventional radiologic procedures. / Carlson, Stephanie K; Bender, C. E.; Classic, K. L.; Zink, F. E.; Quam, J. P.; Ward, E. M.; Oberg, Ann L.

In: Radiology, Vol. 219, No. 2, 2001, p. 515-520.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Carlson, SK, Bender, CE, Classic, KL, Zink, FE, Quam, JP, Ward, EM & Oberg, AL 2001, 'Benefits and safety of CT fluoroscopy in interventional radiologic procedures', Radiology, vol. 219, no. 2, pp. 515-520.
Carlson SK, Bender CE, Classic KL, Zink FE, Quam JP, Ward EM et al. Benefits and safety of CT fluoroscopy in interventional radiologic procedures. Radiology. 2001;219(2):515-520.
Carlson, Stephanie K ; Bender, C. E. ; Classic, K. L. ; Zink, F. E. ; Quam, J. P. ; Ward, E. M. ; Oberg, Ann L. / Benefits and safety of CT fluoroscopy in interventional radiologic procedures. In: Radiology. 2001 ; Vol. 219, No. 2. pp. 515-520.
@article{67afe5b8d056422e899b38ae0e937501,
title = "Benefits and safety of CT fluoroscopy in interventional radiologic procedures",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To determine the benefits and safety of computed tomographic (CT) fluoroscopy when compared with conventional CT for the guidance of interventional radiologic procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data on 203 consecutive percutaneous interventional procedures performed with use of CT fluoroscopic guidance and 99 consecutive procedures with conventional CT guidance were obtained from a questionnaire completed by the radiologists and CT technologists who performed the procedures. The questionnaire specifically addressed radiation dose measurements to patients and personnel, total procedure time, total CT fluoroscopy time, mode of CT fluoroscopic guidance (continuous versus intermittent), success of procedure, major complications, type of procedure (biopsy, aspiration, or drainage), site of procedure, and level of operator experience. RESULTS: The median calculated patient absorbed dose per procedure and the median procedure time with CT fluoroscopy were 94{\%} less and 32{\%} less, respectively, than those measurements with conventional CT scanning (P < .05). An intermittent mode of image acquisition was used in 97{\%} of the 203 cases. This resulted in personnel radiation dosimetric readings below measurable levels in all cases. CONCLUSION: As implemented at the authors' institution, use of CT fluoroscopy for the guidance of interventional radiologic procedures markedly decreased patient radiation dose and total procedure time compared with use of conventional CT guidance.",
keywords = "**.12115, **.12115, **.12119 Computed tomography (CT), **.12119 Interventional procedures, **.1261, **.1262, **.1263, Comparative studies, Computed tomography (CT), Guidance, Radiation exposure Computed tomography (CT), Technology, Utilization Fluoroscopy",
author = "Carlson, {Stephanie K} and Bender, {C. E.} and Classic, {K. L.} and Zink, {F. E.} and Quam, {J. P.} and Ward, {E. M.} and Oberg, {Ann L}",
year = "2001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "219",
pages = "515--520",
journal = "Radiology",
issn = "0033-8419",
publisher = "Radiological Society of North America Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Benefits and safety of CT fluoroscopy in interventional radiologic procedures

AU - Carlson, Stephanie K

AU - Bender, C. E.

AU - Classic, K. L.

AU - Zink, F. E.

AU - Quam, J. P.

AU - Ward, E. M.

AU - Oberg, Ann L

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - PURPOSE: To determine the benefits and safety of computed tomographic (CT) fluoroscopy when compared with conventional CT for the guidance of interventional radiologic procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data on 203 consecutive percutaneous interventional procedures performed with use of CT fluoroscopic guidance and 99 consecutive procedures with conventional CT guidance were obtained from a questionnaire completed by the radiologists and CT technologists who performed the procedures. The questionnaire specifically addressed radiation dose measurements to patients and personnel, total procedure time, total CT fluoroscopy time, mode of CT fluoroscopic guidance (continuous versus intermittent), success of procedure, major complications, type of procedure (biopsy, aspiration, or drainage), site of procedure, and level of operator experience. RESULTS: The median calculated patient absorbed dose per procedure and the median procedure time with CT fluoroscopy were 94% less and 32% less, respectively, than those measurements with conventional CT scanning (P < .05). An intermittent mode of image acquisition was used in 97% of the 203 cases. This resulted in personnel radiation dosimetric readings below measurable levels in all cases. CONCLUSION: As implemented at the authors' institution, use of CT fluoroscopy for the guidance of interventional radiologic procedures markedly decreased patient radiation dose and total procedure time compared with use of conventional CT guidance.

AB - PURPOSE: To determine the benefits and safety of computed tomographic (CT) fluoroscopy when compared with conventional CT for the guidance of interventional radiologic procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data on 203 consecutive percutaneous interventional procedures performed with use of CT fluoroscopic guidance and 99 consecutive procedures with conventional CT guidance were obtained from a questionnaire completed by the radiologists and CT technologists who performed the procedures. The questionnaire specifically addressed radiation dose measurements to patients and personnel, total procedure time, total CT fluoroscopy time, mode of CT fluoroscopic guidance (continuous versus intermittent), success of procedure, major complications, type of procedure (biopsy, aspiration, or drainage), site of procedure, and level of operator experience. RESULTS: The median calculated patient absorbed dose per procedure and the median procedure time with CT fluoroscopy were 94% less and 32% less, respectively, than those measurements with conventional CT scanning (P < .05). An intermittent mode of image acquisition was used in 97% of the 203 cases. This resulted in personnel radiation dosimetric readings below measurable levels in all cases. CONCLUSION: As implemented at the authors' institution, use of CT fluoroscopy for the guidance of interventional radiologic procedures markedly decreased patient radiation dose and total procedure time compared with use of conventional CT guidance.

KW - .12115

KW - .12115

KW - .12119 Computed tomography (CT)

KW - .12119 Interventional procedures

KW - .1261

KW - .1262

KW - .1263

KW - Comparative studies

KW - Computed tomography (CT)

KW - Guidance

KW - Radiation exposure Computed tomography (CT)

KW - Technology

KW - Utilization Fluoroscopy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035064218&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035064218&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 11323481

AN - SCOPUS:0035064218

VL - 219

SP - 515

EP - 520

JO - Radiology

JF - Radiology

SN - 0033-8419

IS - 2

ER -