TY - JOUR
T1 - Bedside Clinicians' Perceptions on the Contributing Role of Diagnostic Errors in Acutely Ill Patient Presentation
T2 - A Survey of Academic and Community Practice
AU - Huang, Chanyan
AU - Barwise, Amelia
AU - Soleimani, Jalal
AU - Dong, Yue
AU - Svetlana, Herasevich
AU - Khan, Syed Anjum
AU - Gavin, Anne
AU - Helgeson, Scott A.
AU - Moreno-Franco, Pablo
AU - Pinevich, Yuliya
AU - Kashyap, Rahul
AU - Herasevich, Vitaly
AU - Gajic, Ognjen
AU - Pickering, Brian W.
N1 - Funding Information:
This project was supported by a grant from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (R18HS026609) and also a Discovery Grant Award from the Society of Critical Care Medicine.
Publisher Copyright:
© Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/3/1
Y1 - 2022/3/1
N2 - Objectives This study aimed to explore clinicians' perceptions of the occurrence of and factors associated with diagnostic errors in patients evaluated during a rapid response team (RRT) activation or unplanned admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). Methods A multicenter prospective survey study was conducted among multiprofessional clinicians involved in the care of patients with RRT activations and/or unplanned ICU admissions (UIAs) at 2 academic hospitals and 1 community-based hospital between April 2019 and March 2020. A study investigator screened eligible patients every day. Within 24 hours of the event, a research coordinator administered the survey to clinicians, who were asked the following: whether diagnostic errors contributed to the reason for RRT/UIA, whether any new diagnosis was made after RRT/UIA, if there were any failures to communicate the diagnosis, and if involvement of specialists earlier would have benefited that patient. Patient clinical data were extracted from the electronic health record. Results A total of 1815 patients experienced RRT activations, and 1024 patients experienced UIA. Clinicians reported that 18.2% (95/522) of patients experienced diagnostic errors, 8.0% (42/522) experienced a failure of communication, and 16.7% (87/522) may have benefitted from earlier involvement of specialists. Compared with academic settings, clinicians in the community hospital were less likely to report diagnostic errors (7.0% versus 22.8%, P = 0.002). Conclusions Clinicians report a high rate of diagnostic errors in patients they evaluate during RRT or UIAs.
AB - Objectives This study aimed to explore clinicians' perceptions of the occurrence of and factors associated with diagnostic errors in patients evaluated during a rapid response team (RRT) activation or unplanned admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). Methods A multicenter prospective survey study was conducted among multiprofessional clinicians involved in the care of patients with RRT activations and/or unplanned ICU admissions (UIAs) at 2 academic hospitals and 1 community-based hospital between April 2019 and March 2020. A study investigator screened eligible patients every day. Within 24 hours of the event, a research coordinator administered the survey to clinicians, who were asked the following: whether diagnostic errors contributed to the reason for RRT/UIA, whether any new diagnosis was made after RRT/UIA, if there were any failures to communicate the diagnosis, and if involvement of specialists earlier would have benefited that patient. Patient clinical data were extracted from the electronic health record. Results A total of 1815 patients experienced RRT activations, and 1024 patients experienced UIA. Clinicians reported that 18.2% (95/522) of patients experienced diagnostic errors, 8.0% (42/522) experienced a failure of communication, and 16.7% (87/522) may have benefitted from earlier involvement of specialists. Compared with academic settings, clinicians in the community hospital were less likely to report diagnostic errors (7.0% versus 22.8%, P = 0.002). Conclusions Clinicians report a high rate of diagnostic errors in patients they evaluate during RRT or UIAs.
KW - acutely ill patients
KW - communication
KW - diagnostic errors
KW - rapid response team
KW - subspecialty consultation
KW - survey
KW - unplanned ICU admission
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85125066069&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85125066069&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000840
DO - 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000840
M3 - Article
C2 - 35188935
AN - SCOPUS:85125066069
SN - 1549-8417
VL - 18
SP - E454-E462
JO - Journal of Patient Safety
JF - Journal of Patient Safety
IS - 2
ER -