Baseline disability and poor functioning in Bipolar disorder predict worse outcomes: Results from the Bipolar CHOICE study

Thilo Deckersbach, Andrew A. Nierenberg, Melvin G. McInnis, Stephanie Salcedo, Emily E. Bernstein, David E. Kemp, Richard C. Shelton, Susan L. McElroy, Louisa G. Sylvia, James H. Kocsis, William V Bobo, Edward S. Friedman, Vivek Singh, Mauricio Tohen, Charles L. Bowden, Terence A. Ketter, Joseph R. Calabrese, Michael E. Thase, Noreen A. Reilly-Harrington, Dustin J. RabideauGustavo Kinrys, Masoud Kamali

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To examine the effects of treatment on functioning impairments and quality of life and assess baseline functioning and employment status as predictors of treatment response in symptomatic individuals from the Bipolar Clinical Health Outcomes Initiative in Comparative Effectiveness (Bipolar CHOICE) study. Method: Bipolar CHOICE was an 11-site, 6-month randomized effectiveness study comparing lithium to quetiapine, each with adjunctive personalized treatments (APTs). We examined post hoc (1) the effects of treatment on functioning, (2) how changes in functioning differed between treatment responders and nonresponders, and (3) whether functioning and employment status mediated treatment response in 482 participants with DSM-IV-TR bipolar I or II disorder from September 2010 to September 2013. Results: Treatment was associated with significant improvements in functioning and quality of life, regardless of treatment group (P values

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)100-108
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Clinical Psychiatry
Volume77
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

Fingerprint

Bipolar Disorder
Quality of Life
Health
Lithium
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Quetiapine Fumarate

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Deckersbach, T., Nierenberg, A. A., McInnis, M. G., Salcedo, S., Bernstein, E. E., Kemp, D. E., ... Kamali, M. (2016). Baseline disability and poor functioning in Bipolar disorder predict worse outcomes: Results from the Bipolar CHOICE study. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 77(1), 100-108. https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.14m09210

Baseline disability and poor functioning in Bipolar disorder predict worse outcomes : Results from the Bipolar CHOICE study. / Deckersbach, Thilo; Nierenberg, Andrew A.; McInnis, Melvin G.; Salcedo, Stephanie; Bernstein, Emily E.; Kemp, David E.; Shelton, Richard C.; McElroy, Susan L.; Sylvia, Louisa G.; Kocsis, James H.; Bobo, William V; Friedman, Edward S.; Singh, Vivek; Tohen, Mauricio; Bowden, Charles L.; Ketter, Terence A.; Calabrese, Joseph R.; Thase, Michael E.; Reilly-Harrington, Noreen A.; Rabideau, Dustin J.; Kinrys, Gustavo; Kamali, Masoud.

In: Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, Vol. 77, No. 1, 01.01.2016, p. 100-108.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Deckersbach, T, Nierenberg, AA, McInnis, MG, Salcedo, S, Bernstein, EE, Kemp, DE, Shelton, RC, McElroy, SL, Sylvia, LG, Kocsis, JH, Bobo, WV, Friedman, ES, Singh, V, Tohen, M, Bowden, CL, Ketter, TA, Calabrese, JR, Thase, ME, Reilly-Harrington, NA, Rabideau, DJ, Kinrys, G & Kamali, M 2016, 'Baseline disability and poor functioning in Bipolar disorder predict worse outcomes: Results from the Bipolar CHOICE study', Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 100-108. https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.14m09210
Deckersbach, Thilo ; Nierenberg, Andrew A. ; McInnis, Melvin G. ; Salcedo, Stephanie ; Bernstein, Emily E. ; Kemp, David E. ; Shelton, Richard C. ; McElroy, Susan L. ; Sylvia, Louisa G. ; Kocsis, James H. ; Bobo, William V ; Friedman, Edward S. ; Singh, Vivek ; Tohen, Mauricio ; Bowden, Charles L. ; Ketter, Terence A. ; Calabrese, Joseph R. ; Thase, Michael E. ; Reilly-Harrington, Noreen A. ; Rabideau, Dustin J. ; Kinrys, Gustavo ; Kamali, Masoud. / Baseline disability and poor functioning in Bipolar disorder predict worse outcomes : Results from the Bipolar CHOICE study. In: Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 2016 ; Vol. 77, No. 1. pp. 100-108.
@article{c3fc3bc381f849e7a9a70f29cc216589,
title = "Baseline disability and poor functioning in Bipolar disorder predict worse outcomes: Results from the Bipolar CHOICE study",
abstract = "Objective: To examine the effects of treatment on functioning impairments and quality of life and assess baseline functioning and employment status as predictors of treatment response in symptomatic individuals from the Bipolar Clinical Health Outcomes Initiative in Comparative Effectiveness (Bipolar CHOICE) study. Method: Bipolar CHOICE was an 11-site, 6-month randomized effectiveness study comparing lithium to quetiapine, each with adjunctive personalized treatments (APTs). We examined post hoc (1) the effects of treatment on functioning, (2) how changes in functioning differed between treatment responders and nonresponders, and (3) whether functioning and employment status mediated treatment response in 482 participants with DSM-IV-TR bipolar I or II disorder from September 2010 to September 2013. Results: Treatment was associated with significant improvements in functioning and quality of life, regardless of treatment group (P values",
author = "Thilo Deckersbach and Nierenberg, {Andrew A.} and McInnis, {Melvin G.} and Stephanie Salcedo and Bernstein, {Emily E.} and Kemp, {David E.} and Shelton, {Richard C.} and McElroy, {Susan L.} and Sylvia, {Louisa G.} and Kocsis, {James H.} and Bobo, {William V} and Friedman, {Edward S.} and Vivek Singh and Mauricio Tohen and Bowden, {Charles L.} and Ketter, {Terence A.} and Calabrese, {Joseph R.} and Thase, {Michael E.} and Reilly-Harrington, {Noreen A.} and Rabideau, {Dustin J.} and Gustavo Kinrys and Masoud Kamali",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4088/JCP.14m09210",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "77",
pages = "100--108",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Psychiatry",
issn = "0160-6689",
publisher = "Physicians Postgraduate Press Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Baseline disability and poor functioning in Bipolar disorder predict worse outcomes

T2 - Results from the Bipolar CHOICE study

AU - Deckersbach, Thilo

AU - Nierenberg, Andrew A.

AU - McInnis, Melvin G.

AU - Salcedo, Stephanie

AU - Bernstein, Emily E.

AU - Kemp, David E.

AU - Shelton, Richard C.

AU - McElroy, Susan L.

AU - Sylvia, Louisa G.

AU - Kocsis, James H.

AU - Bobo, William V

AU - Friedman, Edward S.

AU - Singh, Vivek

AU - Tohen, Mauricio

AU - Bowden, Charles L.

AU - Ketter, Terence A.

AU - Calabrese, Joseph R.

AU - Thase, Michael E.

AU - Reilly-Harrington, Noreen A.

AU - Rabideau, Dustin J.

AU - Kinrys, Gustavo

AU - Kamali, Masoud

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Objective: To examine the effects of treatment on functioning impairments and quality of life and assess baseline functioning and employment status as predictors of treatment response in symptomatic individuals from the Bipolar Clinical Health Outcomes Initiative in Comparative Effectiveness (Bipolar CHOICE) study. Method: Bipolar CHOICE was an 11-site, 6-month randomized effectiveness study comparing lithium to quetiapine, each with adjunctive personalized treatments (APTs). We examined post hoc (1) the effects of treatment on functioning, (2) how changes in functioning differed between treatment responders and nonresponders, and (3) whether functioning and employment status mediated treatment response in 482 participants with DSM-IV-TR bipolar I or II disorder from September 2010 to September 2013. Results: Treatment was associated with significant improvements in functioning and quality of life, regardless of treatment group (P values

AB - Objective: To examine the effects of treatment on functioning impairments and quality of life and assess baseline functioning and employment status as predictors of treatment response in symptomatic individuals from the Bipolar Clinical Health Outcomes Initiative in Comparative Effectiveness (Bipolar CHOICE) study. Method: Bipolar CHOICE was an 11-site, 6-month randomized effectiveness study comparing lithium to quetiapine, each with adjunctive personalized treatments (APTs). We examined post hoc (1) the effects of treatment on functioning, (2) how changes in functioning differed between treatment responders and nonresponders, and (3) whether functioning and employment status mediated treatment response in 482 participants with DSM-IV-TR bipolar I or II disorder from September 2010 to September 2013. Results: Treatment was associated with significant improvements in functioning and quality of life, regardless of treatment group (P values

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84957818759&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84957818759&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4088/JCP.14m09210

DO - 10.4088/JCP.14m09210

M3 - Article

C2 - 26845265

AN - SCOPUS:84957818759

VL - 77

SP - 100

EP - 108

JO - Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

JF - Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

SN - 0160-6689

IS - 1

ER -