Barrett's esophagus: Diagnosis by double-contrast esophagography

A. M. Gilchrist, M. S. Levine, R. F. Carr, S. H. Saul, David A Katzka, H. Herlinger, I. Laufer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A blinded, retrospective study was performed to determine the role of double-contrast esophagography in diagnosing Barrett's esophagus. The study group consisted of 200 patients who had double-contrast esophagrams and endoscopy because of severe reflux symptoms. The radiographs were reviewed by two gastrointestinal radiologists who had no knowledge of the endoscopic findings. Patients were classified as being at high risk for Barrett's esophagus if the radiographs revealed a high stricture or ulcer or a reticular mucosal pattern; at moderate risk if the radiographs revealed a distal peptic stricture and/or reflux esophagitis; and at low risk if none of the aforementioned findings were present. When these radiologic criteria were used, 10 patients (5%) were thought to be at high risk, 73 (37%) at moderate risk, and 117 (58%) at low risk for Barrett's esophagus. Endoscopic correlation revealed biopsy-proved Barrett's mucosa in nine (90%) of 10 patients at high risk, in 12 (16%) of 73 at moderate risk, and in only one (1%) of 117 at low risk for Barrett's esophagus. Thus, endoscopy is clearly indicated for patients in the high-risk group. Because of the lower prevalence of Barrett's esophagus in the moderate-risk group, clinical judgement should be used in deciding when to perform endoscopy in these patients. However, most patients were in the low-risk group, and the prevalence of Barrett's esophagus was so low in this group that endoscopy does not appear to be warranted. Thus, the major value of double-contrast esophagography is its ability to separate patients into high-, moderate-, and low-risk groups for Barrett's esophagus to determine the relative need for endoscopy and biopsy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)97-102
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Roentgenology
Volume150
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1987
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Barrett Esophagus
Endoscopy
Peptic Esophagitis
Pathologic Constriction
Biopsy
Aptitude
Ulcer
Mucous Membrane
Retrospective Studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Gilchrist, A. M., Levine, M. S., Carr, R. F., Saul, S. H., Katzka, D. A., Herlinger, H., & Laufer, I. (1987). Barrett's esophagus: Diagnosis by double-contrast esophagography. American Journal of Roentgenology, 150(1), 97-102.

Barrett's esophagus : Diagnosis by double-contrast esophagography. / Gilchrist, A. M.; Levine, M. S.; Carr, R. F.; Saul, S. H.; Katzka, David A; Herlinger, H.; Laufer, I.

In: American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 150, No. 1, 1987, p. 97-102.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gilchrist, AM, Levine, MS, Carr, RF, Saul, SH, Katzka, DA, Herlinger, H & Laufer, I 1987, 'Barrett's esophagus: Diagnosis by double-contrast esophagography', American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 150, no. 1, pp. 97-102.
Gilchrist AM, Levine MS, Carr RF, Saul SH, Katzka DA, Herlinger H et al. Barrett's esophagus: Diagnosis by double-contrast esophagography. American Journal of Roentgenology. 1987;150(1):97-102.
Gilchrist, A. M. ; Levine, M. S. ; Carr, R. F. ; Saul, S. H. ; Katzka, David A ; Herlinger, H. ; Laufer, I. / Barrett's esophagus : Diagnosis by double-contrast esophagography. In: American Journal of Roentgenology. 1987 ; Vol. 150, No. 1. pp. 97-102.
@article{ab647b018f214b7898df928514d774f5,
title = "Barrett's esophagus: Diagnosis by double-contrast esophagography",
abstract = "A blinded, retrospective study was performed to determine the role of double-contrast esophagography in diagnosing Barrett's esophagus. The study group consisted of 200 patients who had double-contrast esophagrams and endoscopy because of severe reflux symptoms. The radiographs were reviewed by two gastrointestinal radiologists who had no knowledge of the endoscopic findings. Patients were classified as being at high risk for Barrett's esophagus if the radiographs revealed a high stricture or ulcer or a reticular mucosal pattern; at moderate risk if the radiographs revealed a distal peptic stricture and/or reflux esophagitis; and at low risk if none of the aforementioned findings were present. When these radiologic criteria were used, 10 patients (5{\%}) were thought to be at high risk, 73 (37{\%}) at moderate risk, and 117 (58{\%}) at low risk for Barrett's esophagus. Endoscopic correlation revealed biopsy-proved Barrett's mucosa in nine (90{\%}) of 10 patients at high risk, in 12 (16{\%}) of 73 at moderate risk, and in only one (1{\%}) of 117 at low risk for Barrett's esophagus. Thus, endoscopy is clearly indicated for patients in the high-risk group. Because of the lower prevalence of Barrett's esophagus in the moderate-risk group, clinical judgement should be used in deciding when to perform endoscopy in these patients. However, most patients were in the low-risk group, and the prevalence of Barrett's esophagus was so low in this group that endoscopy does not appear to be warranted. Thus, the major value of double-contrast esophagography is its ability to separate patients into high-, moderate-, and low-risk groups for Barrett's esophagus to determine the relative need for endoscopy and biopsy.",
author = "Gilchrist, {A. M.} and Levine, {M. S.} and Carr, {R. F.} and Saul, {S. H.} and Katzka, {David A} and H. Herlinger and I. Laufer",
year = "1987",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "150",
pages = "97--102",
journal = "American Journal of Roentgenology",
issn = "0361-803X",
publisher = "American Roentgen Ray Society",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Barrett's esophagus

T2 - Diagnosis by double-contrast esophagography

AU - Gilchrist, A. M.

AU - Levine, M. S.

AU - Carr, R. F.

AU - Saul, S. H.

AU - Katzka, David A

AU - Herlinger, H.

AU - Laufer, I.

PY - 1987

Y1 - 1987

N2 - A blinded, retrospective study was performed to determine the role of double-contrast esophagography in diagnosing Barrett's esophagus. The study group consisted of 200 patients who had double-contrast esophagrams and endoscopy because of severe reflux symptoms. The radiographs were reviewed by two gastrointestinal radiologists who had no knowledge of the endoscopic findings. Patients were classified as being at high risk for Barrett's esophagus if the radiographs revealed a high stricture or ulcer or a reticular mucosal pattern; at moderate risk if the radiographs revealed a distal peptic stricture and/or reflux esophagitis; and at low risk if none of the aforementioned findings were present. When these radiologic criteria were used, 10 patients (5%) were thought to be at high risk, 73 (37%) at moderate risk, and 117 (58%) at low risk for Barrett's esophagus. Endoscopic correlation revealed biopsy-proved Barrett's mucosa in nine (90%) of 10 patients at high risk, in 12 (16%) of 73 at moderate risk, and in only one (1%) of 117 at low risk for Barrett's esophagus. Thus, endoscopy is clearly indicated for patients in the high-risk group. Because of the lower prevalence of Barrett's esophagus in the moderate-risk group, clinical judgement should be used in deciding when to perform endoscopy in these patients. However, most patients were in the low-risk group, and the prevalence of Barrett's esophagus was so low in this group that endoscopy does not appear to be warranted. Thus, the major value of double-contrast esophagography is its ability to separate patients into high-, moderate-, and low-risk groups for Barrett's esophagus to determine the relative need for endoscopy and biopsy.

AB - A blinded, retrospective study was performed to determine the role of double-contrast esophagography in diagnosing Barrett's esophagus. The study group consisted of 200 patients who had double-contrast esophagrams and endoscopy because of severe reflux symptoms. The radiographs were reviewed by two gastrointestinal radiologists who had no knowledge of the endoscopic findings. Patients were classified as being at high risk for Barrett's esophagus if the radiographs revealed a high stricture or ulcer or a reticular mucosal pattern; at moderate risk if the radiographs revealed a distal peptic stricture and/or reflux esophagitis; and at low risk if none of the aforementioned findings were present. When these radiologic criteria were used, 10 patients (5%) were thought to be at high risk, 73 (37%) at moderate risk, and 117 (58%) at low risk for Barrett's esophagus. Endoscopic correlation revealed biopsy-proved Barrett's mucosa in nine (90%) of 10 patients at high risk, in 12 (16%) of 73 at moderate risk, and in only one (1%) of 117 at low risk for Barrett's esophagus. Thus, endoscopy is clearly indicated for patients in the high-risk group. Because of the lower prevalence of Barrett's esophagus in the moderate-risk group, clinical judgement should be used in deciding when to perform endoscopy in these patients. However, most patients were in the low-risk group, and the prevalence of Barrett's esophagus was so low in this group that endoscopy does not appear to be warranted. Thus, the major value of double-contrast esophagography is its ability to separate patients into high-, moderate-, and low-risk groups for Barrett's esophagus to determine the relative need for endoscopy and biopsy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023581934&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023581934&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 3257139

AN - SCOPUS:0023581934

VL - 150

SP - 97

EP - 102

JO - American Journal of Roentgenology

JF - American Journal of Roentgenology

SN - 0361-803X

IS - 1

ER -