Barium enemas of carcinoma of the colon: Sensitivity of double- and single-contrast studies

C. D. Johnson, H. C. Carlson, W. F. Taylor, L. P. Weiland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

61 Scopus citations

Abstract

A total of 1,140 primary colorectal carcinomas found in 1084 patients during a 5 1/2 -year period (1976 to mid-1981) at the Mayo Clinic was reviewed to evaluate the accuracy of detection by the double- and single-contrast barium enema examinations. Both methods were equally sensitive in detecting colon cancer above the proctoscopic level. The error rate (ulcerative colitis excluded) was 4.8% for the single-contrast enema and 4.7% for the double-contrast study. Neither type of examination was superior in finding smaller lesions or earlier staged lesions. Several causes for error were identified: fluoroscopic inexperience, technical factors, misinterpretation of radiologic findings, and distraction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1143-1149
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Roentgenology
Volume140
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 1983

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Barium enemas of carcinoma of the colon: Sensitivity of double- and single-contrast studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this