TY - JOUR
T1 - Bad players in AL amyloidosis in the current era of treatment
AU - Kreiniz, Natalia
AU - Gertz, Morie A.
N1 - Funding Information:
This paper was not funded. The figures for this manuscript were prepared with Biorender.com
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Introduction: Systemic AL amyloidosis (ALA) is a clonal plasma cell (PC) disease characterized by deposition of amyloid fibrils in different organs and tissues. Traditionally, the prognosis of ALA is poor and is primarily defined by cardiac involvement. The modern prognostic models are based on cardiac markers and free light chain difference (dFLC). Cardiac biomarkers have low specificity and are dependent on renal function, volume status, and cardiac diseases other than ALA. New therapies significantly improved the prognosis of the disease. The advancements in technologies–cardiac echocardiography (ECHO) and cardiac MRI (CMR), as well as new biological markers, relying on cardiac injury, inflammation, endothelial damage, and clonal and non-clonal PC markers are promising. Areas covered: An update on the prognostic significance of cardiac ALA, number of involved organs, response to treatment, including minimal residual disease (MRD), ECHO, MRI, and new biological markers will be discussed. The literature search was done in PubMed and Google Scholar, and the most recent and relevant data are included. Expert opinion: Prospective multicenter trials, evaluating multiple clinical and laboratory parameters, should be done to improve the risk assessment models in ALA in the modern era of therapy.
AB - Introduction: Systemic AL amyloidosis (ALA) is a clonal plasma cell (PC) disease characterized by deposition of amyloid fibrils in different organs and tissues. Traditionally, the prognosis of ALA is poor and is primarily defined by cardiac involvement. The modern prognostic models are based on cardiac markers and free light chain difference (dFLC). Cardiac biomarkers have low specificity and are dependent on renal function, volume status, and cardiac diseases other than ALA. New therapies significantly improved the prognosis of the disease. The advancements in technologies–cardiac echocardiography (ECHO) and cardiac MRI (CMR), as well as new biological markers, relying on cardiac injury, inflammation, endothelial damage, and clonal and non-clonal PC markers are promising. Areas covered: An update on the prognostic significance of cardiac ALA, number of involved organs, response to treatment, including minimal residual disease (MRD), ECHO, MRI, and new biological markers will be discussed. The literature search was done in PubMed and Google Scholar, and the most recent and relevant data are included. Expert opinion: Prospective multicenter trials, evaluating multiple clinical and laboratory parameters, should be done to improve the risk assessment models in ALA in the modern era of therapy.
KW - AL amyloidosis
KW - biological markers
KW - BNP
KW - cardiac amyloidosis
KW - immunoglobulin free light chains
KW - prognosis
KW - systemic amyloidosis
KW - troponin
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85146716553&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85146716553&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/17474086.2023.2166924
DO - 10.1080/17474086.2023.2166924
M3 - Review article
C2 - 36620914
AN - SCOPUS:85146716553
SN - 1747-4086
VL - 16
SP - 33
EP - 49
JO - Expert Review of Hematology
JF - Expert Review of Hematology
IS - 1
ER -