Background parenchymal uptake during molecular breast imaging and associated clinical factors

Carrie B Hruska, Deborah Rhodes, Amy Lynn Conners, Katie N. Jones, Rickey E. Carter, Ravi K. Lingineni, Celine M Vachon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. The purposes of this study were to describe the prevalence of background parenchymal uptake categories observed at screening molecular breast imaging (MBI) and to examine the association of background parenchymal uptake with mammographic density and other clinical factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Adjunct MBI screening was performed for women with dense breasts on previous mammograms. Two radiologists reviewed images from the MBI examinations and subjectively categorized background parenchymal uptake into four groups: photopenic, minimal-mild, moderate, or marked. Women with breast implants or a personal history of breast cancer were excluded. The association between background parenchymal uptake categories and patient characteristics was examined with Kruskal-Wallis and chi-square tests as appropriate. RESULTS. In 1149 eligible participants, background parenchymal uptake was photopenic in 252 (22%), minimal-mild in 728 (63%), and moderate or marked in 169 (15%). The distribution of categories differed across BI-RADS density categories (p < 0.0001). In 164 participants with extremely dense breasts, background parenchymal uptake was photopenic in 72 (44%), minimal-mild in 55 (34%), and moderate or marked in 37 (22%). The moderatemarked group was younger on average, more likely to be premenopausal or perimenopausal, and more likely to be using postmenopausal hormone therapy than the photopenic or minimal-mild groups (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION. Among women with similar-appearing mammographic density, background parenchymal uptake ranged from photopenic to marked. Background parenchymal uptake was associated with menopausal status and postmenopausal hormone therapy but not with premenopausal hormonal contraceptives, phase of menstrual cycle, or Gail model 5-year risk of breast cancer. Additional work is necessary to fully characterize the underlying cause of background parenchymal uptake and determine its utility in predicting subsequent risk of breast cancer.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)W363-W370
JournalAmerican Journal of Roentgenology
Volume204
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2015

Fingerprint

Molecular Imaging
Breast
Breast Neoplasms
Hormones
Breast Implants
Chi-Square Distribution
Menstrual Cycle
Contraceptive Agents
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Breast density
  • Hormone therapy
  • Menstrual cycle
  • Molecular breast imaging
  • MRI

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Background parenchymal uptake during molecular breast imaging and associated clinical factors. / Hruska, Carrie B; Rhodes, Deborah; Conners, Amy Lynn; Jones, Katie N.; Carter, Rickey E.; Lingineni, Ravi K.; Vachon, Celine M.

In: American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 204, No. 3, 01.03.2015, p. W363-W370.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cef185712853456fb19deb94971a6083,
title = "Background parenchymal uptake during molecular breast imaging and associated clinical factors",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE. The purposes of this study were to describe the prevalence of background parenchymal uptake categories observed at screening molecular breast imaging (MBI) and to examine the association of background parenchymal uptake with mammographic density and other clinical factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Adjunct MBI screening was performed for women with dense breasts on previous mammograms. Two radiologists reviewed images from the MBI examinations and subjectively categorized background parenchymal uptake into four groups: photopenic, minimal-mild, moderate, or marked. Women with breast implants or a personal history of breast cancer were excluded. The association between background parenchymal uptake categories and patient characteristics was examined with Kruskal-Wallis and chi-square tests as appropriate. RESULTS. In 1149 eligible participants, background parenchymal uptake was photopenic in 252 (22{\%}), minimal-mild in 728 (63{\%}), and moderate or marked in 169 (15{\%}). The distribution of categories differed across BI-RADS density categories (p < 0.0001). In 164 participants with extremely dense breasts, background parenchymal uptake was photopenic in 72 (44{\%}), minimal-mild in 55 (34{\%}), and moderate or marked in 37 (22{\%}). The moderatemarked group was younger on average, more likely to be premenopausal or perimenopausal, and more likely to be using postmenopausal hormone therapy than the photopenic or minimal-mild groups (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION. Among women with similar-appearing mammographic density, background parenchymal uptake ranged from photopenic to marked. Background parenchymal uptake was associated with menopausal status and postmenopausal hormone therapy but not with premenopausal hormonal contraceptives, phase of menstrual cycle, or Gail model 5-year risk of breast cancer. Additional work is necessary to fully characterize the underlying cause of background parenchymal uptake and determine its utility in predicting subsequent risk of breast cancer.",
keywords = "Breast density, Hormone therapy, Menstrual cycle, Molecular breast imaging, MRI",
author = "Hruska, {Carrie B} and Deborah Rhodes and Conners, {Amy Lynn} and Jones, {Katie N.} and Carter, {Rickey E.} and Lingineni, {Ravi K.} and Vachon, {Celine M}",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2214/AJR.14.12979",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "204",
pages = "W363--W370",
journal = "American Journal of Roentgenology",
issn = "0361-803X",
publisher = "American Roentgen Ray Society",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Background parenchymal uptake during molecular breast imaging and associated clinical factors

AU - Hruska, Carrie B

AU - Rhodes, Deborah

AU - Conners, Amy Lynn

AU - Jones, Katie N.

AU - Carter, Rickey E.

AU - Lingineni, Ravi K.

AU - Vachon, Celine M

PY - 2015/3/1

Y1 - 2015/3/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE. The purposes of this study were to describe the prevalence of background parenchymal uptake categories observed at screening molecular breast imaging (MBI) and to examine the association of background parenchymal uptake with mammographic density and other clinical factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Adjunct MBI screening was performed for women with dense breasts on previous mammograms. Two radiologists reviewed images from the MBI examinations and subjectively categorized background parenchymal uptake into four groups: photopenic, minimal-mild, moderate, or marked. Women with breast implants or a personal history of breast cancer were excluded. The association between background parenchymal uptake categories and patient characteristics was examined with Kruskal-Wallis and chi-square tests as appropriate. RESULTS. In 1149 eligible participants, background parenchymal uptake was photopenic in 252 (22%), minimal-mild in 728 (63%), and moderate or marked in 169 (15%). The distribution of categories differed across BI-RADS density categories (p < 0.0001). In 164 participants with extremely dense breasts, background parenchymal uptake was photopenic in 72 (44%), minimal-mild in 55 (34%), and moderate or marked in 37 (22%). The moderatemarked group was younger on average, more likely to be premenopausal or perimenopausal, and more likely to be using postmenopausal hormone therapy than the photopenic or minimal-mild groups (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION. Among women with similar-appearing mammographic density, background parenchymal uptake ranged from photopenic to marked. Background parenchymal uptake was associated with menopausal status and postmenopausal hormone therapy but not with premenopausal hormonal contraceptives, phase of menstrual cycle, or Gail model 5-year risk of breast cancer. Additional work is necessary to fully characterize the underlying cause of background parenchymal uptake and determine its utility in predicting subsequent risk of breast cancer.

AB - OBJECTIVE. The purposes of this study were to describe the prevalence of background parenchymal uptake categories observed at screening molecular breast imaging (MBI) and to examine the association of background parenchymal uptake with mammographic density and other clinical factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Adjunct MBI screening was performed for women with dense breasts on previous mammograms. Two radiologists reviewed images from the MBI examinations and subjectively categorized background parenchymal uptake into four groups: photopenic, minimal-mild, moderate, or marked. Women with breast implants or a personal history of breast cancer were excluded. The association between background parenchymal uptake categories and patient characteristics was examined with Kruskal-Wallis and chi-square tests as appropriate. RESULTS. In 1149 eligible participants, background parenchymal uptake was photopenic in 252 (22%), minimal-mild in 728 (63%), and moderate or marked in 169 (15%). The distribution of categories differed across BI-RADS density categories (p < 0.0001). In 164 participants with extremely dense breasts, background parenchymal uptake was photopenic in 72 (44%), minimal-mild in 55 (34%), and moderate or marked in 37 (22%). The moderatemarked group was younger on average, more likely to be premenopausal or perimenopausal, and more likely to be using postmenopausal hormone therapy than the photopenic or minimal-mild groups (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION. Among women with similar-appearing mammographic density, background parenchymal uptake ranged from photopenic to marked. Background parenchymal uptake was associated with menopausal status and postmenopausal hormone therapy but not with premenopausal hormonal contraceptives, phase of menstrual cycle, or Gail model 5-year risk of breast cancer. Additional work is necessary to fully characterize the underlying cause of background parenchymal uptake and determine its utility in predicting subsequent risk of breast cancer.

KW - Breast density

KW - Hormone therapy

KW - Menstrual cycle

KW - Molecular breast imaging

KW - MRI

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84932604336&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84932604336&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2214/AJR.14.12979

DO - 10.2214/AJR.14.12979

M3 - Article

C2 - 25714323

AN - SCOPUS:84932604336

VL - 204

SP - W363-W370

JO - American Journal of Roentgenology

JF - American Journal of Roentgenology

SN - 0361-803X

IS - 3

ER -