TY - JOUR
T1 - Automating Scoliosis Measurements in Radiographic Studies with Machine Learning
T2 - Comparing Artificial Intelligence and Clinical Reports
AU - Ha, Audrey Y.
AU - Do, Bao H.
AU - Bartret, Adam L.
AU - Fang, Charles X.
AU - Hsiao, Albert
AU - Lutz, Amelie M.
AU - Banerjee, Imon
AU - Riley, Geoffrey M.
AU - Rubin, Daniel L.
AU - Stevens, Kathryn J.
AU - Wang, Erin
AU - Wang, Shannon
AU - Beaulieu, Christopher F.
AU - Hurt, Brian
N1 - Funding Information:
There are no conflicts of interests that pertain specifically to this work. However, some of the authors are consultants for the medical industry and received grants not related to this study. Albert Hsiao is a founder and consultant for Arterys Inc. and receives grant support from GE Healthcare, Bayer AG, and the American Roentgen Ray Society as an ARRS Scholar, unrelated to this study. Brian Hurt provides consulting services to Imidex Inc unrelated to this study, and supported by the NIH T32EB005970. Amelie M. Lutz receives research funding from GE Healthcare and material support from Bracco Diagnostics Inc. for projects not related to this study. Kathryn J. Stevens receives research funding from GE Healthcare for projects not related to this study.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine.
PY - 2022/6
Y1 - 2022/6
N2 - Scoliosis is a condition of abnormal lateral spinal curvature affecting an estimated 2 to 3% of the US population, or seven million people. The Cobb angle is the standard measurement of spinal curvature in scoliosis but is known to have high interobserver and intraobserver variability. Thus, the objective of this study was to build and validate a system for automatic quantitative evaluation of the Cobb angle and to compare AI generated and human reports in the clinical setting. After IRB was obtained, we retrospectively collected 2150 frontal view scoliosis radiographs at a tertiary referral center (January 1, 2019, to January 1, 2021, ≥ 16 years old, no hardware). The dataset was partitioned into 1505 train (70%), 215 validation (10%), and 430 test images (20%). All thoracic and lumbar vertebral bodies were segmented with bounding boxes, generating approximately 36,550 object annotations that were used to train a Faster R-CNN Resnet-101 object detection model. A controller algorithm was written to localize vertebral centroid coordinates and derive the Cobb properties (angle and endplate) of dominant and secondary curves. AI-derived Cobb angle measurements were compared to the clinical report measurements, and the Spearman rank-order demonstrated significant correlation (0.89, p < 0.001). Mean difference between AI and clinical report angle measurements was 7.34° (95% CI: 5.90–8.78°), which is similar to published literature (up to 10°). We demonstrate the feasibility of an AI system to automate measurement of level-by-level spinal angulation with performance comparable to radiologists.
AB - Scoliosis is a condition of abnormal lateral spinal curvature affecting an estimated 2 to 3% of the US population, or seven million people. The Cobb angle is the standard measurement of spinal curvature in scoliosis but is known to have high interobserver and intraobserver variability. Thus, the objective of this study was to build and validate a system for automatic quantitative evaluation of the Cobb angle and to compare AI generated and human reports in the clinical setting. After IRB was obtained, we retrospectively collected 2150 frontal view scoliosis radiographs at a tertiary referral center (January 1, 2019, to January 1, 2021, ≥ 16 years old, no hardware). The dataset was partitioned into 1505 train (70%), 215 validation (10%), and 430 test images (20%). All thoracic and lumbar vertebral bodies were segmented with bounding boxes, generating approximately 36,550 object annotations that were used to train a Faster R-CNN Resnet-101 object detection model. A controller algorithm was written to localize vertebral centroid coordinates and derive the Cobb properties (angle and endplate) of dominant and secondary curves. AI-derived Cobb angle measurements were compared to the clinical report measurements, and the Spearman rank-order demonstrated significant correlation (0.89, p < 0.001). Mean difference between AI and clinical report angle measurements was 7.34° (95% CI: 5.90–8.78°), which is similar to published literature (up to 10°). We demonstrate the feasibility of an AI system to automate measurement of level-by-level spinal angulation with performance comparable to radiologists.
KW - Artificial intelligence
KW - Cobb angle
KW - Convolutional neural network
KW - Deep learning
KW - Scoliosis
KW - Spine
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85124590270&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85124590270&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10278-022-00595-x
DO - 10.1007/s10278-022-00595-x
M3 - Article
C2 - 35149938
AN - SCOPUS:85124590270
SN - 0897-1889
VL - 35
SP - 524
EP - 533
JO - Journal of Digital Imaging
JF - Journal of Digital Imaging
IS - 3
ER -